I received this in email (lots of links and information)

[MellowOne]

http://www.411onpolitics.com/wst_page19.html

Click on the link above to visit the 411onpolitics.com’s review of all the election fraud that has happened.

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/ Bev Harris

A phenomenal source of news stories providing information detailing Election fraud incidents.

Over 3000 links regarding the Presidential election of 2004

http://www.betterworldlinks.org/book109h.htm and http://www.linkcrusader.com , http://www.bradblog.com



Washington Post Election Results

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/elections/2004/page/295001/



Florida Election Results via Yahoo Link Directory

http://dir.yahoo.com/Regional/U_S__States/Florida/Government/Politics/Elections/Election_Results/



Ohio Election Results via Yahoo Link Directory

http://dir.yahoo.com/Regional/U_S__States/Ohio/Government/Politics/Elections/Election_Results/



http://www.orlandoweekly.com/news/Story.asp?ID=4688

An excellent review of the multitude of investigations going on! Allen Wald Author

www.411onpolitics.com or visit the yahoo online grassroots organization http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ElectionFraud2004/ for more information on the protest march http://groups.yahoo.com/group/revote2004/

More links to other voter’s rights advocacy groups on the bottom of this page.

A fair assessment of the election 2004 government’s relation with the private sector is “a quartet of companies control the U.S. vote count” says Al Rogers of http://www.411onpolitics.com. Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia and SAIC are all hard-wired into the Bush campaign and power structure. Diebold chief Walden O'Dell is a top Bush fund-raiser. According to "online anarchist community" Infoshop.org, "At Diebold, the election division is run by Bob Urosevich. Bob's brother, Todd, is a top executive at 'rival' ES&S. The brothers were originally staked by Howard Ahmanson, a member of the Council For National Policy, a right-wing steering group stacked with Bush true believers. Ahmanson is also one of the bagmen behind the extremist Christian Reconstruction Movement, which advocates the theocratic takeover of American democracy." Sequoia is owned by a partner member of the Carlyle Group, which is believed to have dictated foreign policy in both Bush administrations and has employed former President Bush for quite a while.

Kathy Dopp's eye-opening examination of Florida's county-by-county record of votes cast and people registered by party affiliation. (http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm) suggests systematic and widespread election fraud in 47 of the state's 67 counties. The websites http://www.verifiedvoting.org and http://www.freezerbox.com websites also back up those statistical figures.

In these optical-scan counties, had GOP registrants voted Republican, Democratic registrants gone for Kerry and everyone registered showed up to vote, Bush would have received 1,337,242 votes. Instead, his reported vote total there was 1,950,213! That discrepancy (612,971) is nearly double Bush's winning margin in the state (380,952).

This fact is most of the anomalies did not occur so much in the touch-screen counties, where public scrutiny would naturally be focused, but in counties where optically screened paper ballots were fed into a central tabulator PC, which is highly vulnerable to hacking.

There were thousands of complaints about Florida voting. Broward County electronic voting machines counted up to 32,500 and then started counting backward.



In Broward County, Florida a "computer programming glitch" on a vote tabulating machine caused the counting of votes to begin going in reverse once the machine reached 32,767 votes. We're told they noticed the software bug in time. What other counties and states in the country use the same model counting machine with the same software error? And did they notice if the same problem occurred? The manufacturer of that counting machine, Electronic Software & Systems, Inc. (ES&S), attempted to discredit the report initially as "user error", but anyone familiar with computer programming recognizes the error that occurred at 32,767 -- it's a very specific number -- and any programmer can tell you why it occurred. HINT: It wasn't user error, it was programming error. And it happened at least twice there that we know about. (If you have trouble getting in touch with ES&S officials, ask Republican Senator Chuck Hagel how to reach them, he used to be their CEO until he retired to run for the Senate. And while you're poking around in Florida, you also may wish to investigate and report upon the tens of thousands of absentee ballots in Florida that went missing, and never made it to voters!)

Voters Unite! (http://www.Votersunite.org ) detailed 303 specific election problems, including 84 complaints of machine malfunctions in 22 states, 24 cases of registration fraud in 14 states, 20 abusive voter challenge situations in 10 states, U.S. voters in 18 states and Israel experiencing absentee ballot difficulties, 10 states with provisional ballot woes, 22 cases of malfeasance in 13 states, 10 charges of voter intimidation in seven states, seven states where votes were suppressed, seven states witnessing outbreaks of animosity at the polls, six states suffering from ballot printing errors and seven instances in four states where votes were changed on-screen. In addition, the Voters Unite! website cites four states with early voting troubles, three states undergoing ballot programming errors, three states demonstrating ballot secrecy violations, bogus ballot fraud in New Mexico and double-voting for Bush in Texas.

In these optical-scan counties, had GOP registrants voted Republican, Democratic registrants gone for Kerry and everyone registered showed up to vote, Bush would have received 1,337,242 votes. Instead, his reported vote total there was 1,950,213! That discrepancy (612,971) is nearly double Bush's winning margin in the state (380,952).

This did not occur so much in the touch-screen counties, where public scrutiny would naturally be focused, but in counties where optically screened paper ballots were fed into a central tabulator PC, which is highly vulnerable to hacking.

In Broward County, Florida a "computer programming glitch" on a vote tabulating machine caused the counting of votes to begin going in reverse once the machine reached 32,767 votes. We're told they noticed the software bug in time. What other counties and states in the country use the same model counting machine with the same software error? And did they notice if the same problem occurred? The manufacturer of that counting machine, Electronic Software & Systems, Inc. (ES&S), attempted to discredit the report initially as "user error", but anyone familiar with computer programming recognizes the error that occurred at 32,767 -- it's a very specific number -- and any programmer can tell you why it occurred. HINT: It wasn't user error, it was programming error. And it happened at least twice there that we know about. (If you have trouble getting in touch with ES&S officials, ask Republican Senator Chuck Hagel how to reach them, he used to be their CEO until he retired to run for the Senate. And while you're poking around in Florida, you also may wish to investigate and report upon the tens of thousands of absentee ballots in Florida that went missing, and never made it to voters!) Also not getting much media attention is the fact that 96% of a missing under vote (4500) on statewide amendment 4 that statistically was running dead even statewide was found during a standard audit. There is only one way mathematically to interpret the fact this programming error exited.

A UC Berkley study released Thursday of 15 counties in Florida has shown anywhere from 130,000-260,000 unexplained extra votes for George W. Bush in Florida in just three of those counties. The results of the study, which already take into account the widely reported "Dixiecrat Effect" in Florida, has now been duplicated and verified by an MIT professor commissioned by the Oakland Tribune. You have yet to report on the disturbing study at all. How can 130 to 260 thousand extra votes in just three counties in Florida be explained?

Why did elections officials in Volusia County, Florida give incorrect information to a "Freedom of Information Act" request by Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org? Why do the numbers she's found seem to indicate inaccuracies in the vote counting there? And why were official election materials found in the dumpster outside the Board of Elections when Harris and her team arrived to pick up such materials? http://www.votergate.tv

http://www.madcowprod.com/11242004.html

Thugs and racketeers counted the votes. Click on the above link to read a story that was missed by the mainstream media. A voting machine company with a long criminal record is discussed at length in this article.

http://www.votersunite.org/electionproblems.asp?sort=state&selectstate=NC&selectproblemtype=ALL

North Carolina review of Election operation problems.



According to a November 5, 2004 article reported by the Associated Press, election officials in Ohio admitted that an error with their electronic voting system gave President Bush 3,893 extra votes in a Gahanna precinct. They also confirmed that Franklin County reported Bush with 4,258 votes and John Kerry with 260, even though only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct. These same election officials are now stating for the record that a cartridge from a voting machine generated errors after the precinct closed, and that only 365 people voted for Bush. This was reported as a press release from Ralph Nader. Many more examples of election fraud can be found after reviewing both the links below and what is written afterwards.

These voting irregularities are not limited to just Florida and Ohio and in time I believe the media will expose how widespread the Election Fraud and that it affected more than just the Presidential race but many senatorial and congressional races as well.

The government-controlled media’s objective: To suppress Election Fraud information “The price of liberty is eternal vigilance” Thomas Jefferson. Apparently we must be vigilant with the media as well to ensure our basic rights.

www.jefffisherforcongress.com



http://www.solarbus.org/stealyourelection/articles/summary-anonymous.html

Information on voting irregularities
note: this article was written shortly after election day 11/2. Since that time there have been more developments in this important story. Please see the "Stolen Election?" website for more articles and updates.

Since the US presidential election, accounts of voter fraud and malfunctioning voting machines have flooded into local US newspapers, to public-interest groups, to universities, and to weblogs.

This letter is an overview of those reports.

The stories are summarized here, with links to the original publications. After seeing this evidence - and there is more still to be rounded up - you will most probably suspect that Bush did not win the election.

Many accounts of election tampering are included, but a broad search has still to be done. The following is only what has been learned in the few days since the election. Clearly, an investigation is needed.

The following is a compilation of the initial research of one group of concerned US journalists.

It seems that there is enough evidence in the following to suggest that the electorate may have actually chosen Kerry for President. It cannot be known for sure unless there is a recount.

Bush has not yet been chosen by the Electoral College. The Electors meet and vote on Dec. 13. Questions need to be raised about the results (immediately and loudly) to get an investigation launched before that date.

So far, the mainstream media in not picking up the story. Remember that they moved very slowly after the anomalies of 2000 US election.

Here are the accounts of election tampering from four states, plus reports on multi-state problems.

(Please note: some of the newspaper links may expire soon. You may want to print out the stories so that later on, you don't have to buy them from the newspapers' archives.)

FLORIDA:

The most troubling news has come out of Florida. Throughout most of the state, new electronic voting machines were in use. These machines - many manufactured by a company called Diebold - are controversial because they don't leave a paper trail.

There is no way to double-check the results.

The final Florida tallies on Diebold machines from Tuesday are literally unbelievable.

In 29 counties where Diebold machines (an optical scanner) were used to count the ballots, large majorities of voters were registered Democrats. But the final results gave all the counties to Bush, sometimes by huge margins.

The individual county data shows how unlikely the machine results were.

For instance:

In Calhoun County, 82% of registered voters are Democrats. But Diebold machines said 63% of the county voted for Bush.

In Lafayette County, 83% of voters are Democrats, but Diebold said 74% of the county voted for Bush.

In Liberty County, 88% of voters are Democrats, but Diebold said 64% voted for Bush.

In Washington County, 67% of voters are Democrats, but Diebold said 71% voted for Bush.

This same pattern appears in the results for 29 COUNTIES in Florida. In every one of those counties, the Diebold Optical Scanner produced the results.

The Optical Scanner has been called the voting machine that is most susceptible to tampering.

Many of you have been watching elections closely for years. Do you believe that in 29 Florida counties in which Democrats were in the majority - in some cases with 4 out of 5 registered voters being Democrats - they all voted strongly for Bush?

Here are the links.

You can find the voter registration/final result data here:

http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm

You can find a story analyzing these results here:

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1106-30.htm

You can read about electronic voting machines - an untested phenomenon in American elections, here:

http://wwwmoderateindependent.com/v2i21thoreau.htm

THE OTHER PROBLEM IN FLORIDA:

In 6 counties - again, they were all using electronic machines - more votes for President were recorded than there were actual voters in the counties.

Altogether, these six counties reported 188,885 more votes for President than there are voters living there.

Right now, no one knows whether those extra 188,000 votes were cast for Bush or for Kerry. But Bush won the state of Florida by a 5% margin - contrary to what all the polls were showing only days earlier.

In Glades County: 2,443 votes for Bush / 1,718 votes for Kerry / 27 votes for Other. Those add up to 4,188. But the machines recorded the official turnout as 3,446. That adds up to 742 more votes than voters.

In Highlands County: 25,874 for Bush / 15,346 for Kerry / 271 for Other. Official Turnout: 33,996. That adds up to 7,495 more votes than voters.

In Miami-Dade County: 358,613 for Bush / 406,099 for Kerry / 3,841 for Other. Official Turnout 716,574. That adds up to 51,979 more votes than voters.

In Osceola County: 43,108 for Bush / 38,617 for Kerry / 453 for Other. Official Turnout 63589. That adds up to 18,589 more votes than voters.

In Palm Beach County: 211,894 for Bush / 327,698 for Kerry / 3,243 for Other. Official Turnout: 452,061. That adds up to 90,774 more votes than voters.

In Volusia County: 111,544 for Bush / 115,319 for Kerry / 1,495 for Other. Official Turnout: 209,052. That adds up to 19,306 more votes than voters.

Use this link to get to the data:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/5/18466/2846

STILL MORE PROBLEMS IN FLORIDA

This account comes from partisans. Four Kerry volunteers working in Broward County sent a letter detailing election tampering to one newspaper reporter. All four signed it and included their email addresses.

They report a wide, disturbing range of problems, from voters saying their electronic machines malfunctioned, poll workers denied them assistance, to police putting up roadblocks on the routes to polling places, and so on.

The entire text of the letter, along with the signatures, appears at the bottom of this letter.

OHIO

In Ohio, there were problems in four counties and one city.

In Howard County, a judge ruled on Election Day that everyone standing in line to vote at 7:30 p.m. had to eventually be allowed inside.

The order said the ruling was good for the day of Nov. 2. (You can view the order at the website below.) But maybe it didn't occur to the judge that everybody might not make it inside by midnight.

At the stroke of midnight, when the calendar legally clicked over to Nov.3, Republican Ken Blackwell, the secretary of state, told all the waiting voters to go home. His workers gave them paper ballots (i.e., provisional ballots), told them to fill them out and bring them back later.

It was an improvised move that undercut the intent of the judge's ruling, and created chaos. Many people in Howard County still haven't turned in those ballots because they don't know where to take them or what the deadline is.

The only kind of ballot in a federal election that people can legally take home, fill out and turn in later is an absentee ballot, and those are marked as such. They're marked with clear rules concerning deadlines, postmarking, and so on.

So an uncounted number of people in Howard County - estimated in the thousands - couldn't get in and were turned away with what may be ruled an illegal procedure. The vast majority of those votes were expected to go to Kerry based on the heavily Democratic population of Howard County.

The Democrats have filed a lawsuit. You can click on the Ohio State University law school website to read about it. (Click here for the link.)

Meanwhile, in Warren County, election officials locked the doors to the County building and refused to allow bi-partisan observers to watch the vote-count. They also denied access to the AP reporter (it is standard procedure for the AP to observe vote-counting in counties all over the country.)

The Sheriff of the county said he did it for "homeland security" reasons. He never explained or specified what the security concerns were.

Here is the link to the story in the Cincinnati Enquirer:

http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/11/05/loc_warrenvote05.html

Meanwhile, in a Columbus suburb called Gahanna, the same problem showed up with electronic machines that we saw in Florida: more votes were cast than there were voters to cast them. In this case, however, the problem was investigated and the extra 3,893 votes were shown to have been erroneously tallied for Bush.

Here is the link to the story on the Ohio Network News:

http://wwwonnnews.com/Global/story.asp?S=2524952 Meanwhile, in Mahoning and Mercer Counties, electronic machines again malfunctioned, but the effect that had on the vote count is not clear. The machines had to be re-set, and at one point showed votes of "negative 25 million," according to the head of the local board of elections.

Here is the story from the local Youngstown paper, called the Vindicator:

http://wwwvindy.com/basic/news/281829446390855.php

INDIANA

In Laporte County, electronic voting machines once again appear to have failed.

They tallied results for 22,200 voters, even though there are 79,000 registered voters in LaPorte County. Assuming the county actually had a 65% turnout rate (comparable to others in the area and its own track record), that means 29,000 votes were not counted.

Here is the link to the story in the Michigan City News-Dispatch:

http://www.michigancityin.com/articles/2004/11/04/news/news02.txt

NEW HAMPSHIRE

This is one of several states where original exit polls (interviews with voters as they are leaving) do not jive with the results produced by electronic voting machines.

An administrator at Bev Harris's group, called BlackBoxVoting (more on this below) has said that they are urging Ralph Nader to press for a recount in New Hampshire. Nader was on the ballot there, so he is in a good position to ask for a re-count.

You can read about Harris and her work at www.blackboxvoting.org/ http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

SIX STATES

In at least six states, there was a large difference between how people said they'd voted, and how officials said they'd voted.

In Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, New Hampshire and New Mexico, there was a large discrepancy between what voters said in the original exit polls, and the final results claimed by election officials.

In each of those six states, electronic voting machines were used in some or most of the counties.

In contrast, in states where paper ballots were the primary method of voting, there was little or no discrepancy between original exit polls and official results.

To see an easily viewable graph of this data, go to:

http://www.therandirhodesshow.com/todays_show.html

That graph was originally compiled by a website affiliated with The Raw Story, which often gets quoted in the major dailies. It is regarded as a reputable site.

You can see their original posting here:

http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=388

MORE ON EXIT POLLS

These are routinely conducted in elections by major news organizations.

Accounts are surfacing that both the Associated Press and CNN (and perhaps others) later CHANGED their exit polling data to more closely resemble the official results.

None of the news organizations is believed to have offered an explanation. They may try to justify it on statistical grounds.

Here are two accounts. The first is very brief story and the second story is more detailed.

http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/04/11/ana04025.html

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KEE411A.html

MORE ON ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES

Here is an excerpt from the Moderate Independent website about Bev Harris's work. She is a freelance journalist who has been documenting how unreliable the machines are, and how vulnerable they are to tampering.

"Bev Harris, author of Black Box Voting and the blackboxvoting.org/ href="http://blackboxvoting.org/">BlackBoxVoting.org web site, has documented numerous cases of electronic disasters. One occurred in Volusia County, Fla., in 2000 in which county election officials hand recounted more than 184,000 paper ballots used to feed the computerized system, after the central ballot-counting computer showed a Socialist Party candidate receiving more than 9,000 votes and Al Gore getting minus 19,000. Another 4,000 votes were received for Bush that should not have been there.

"Election officials eventually tallied Gore beating Bush by 97,063 votes to 82,214. But the wrong numbers had already been sent to the media, which were used by FOX and other networks to erroneously call the election for Bush and swing the public relations part of the recount battle in his favor."

Three Members of Congress Have Asked the GAO to Investigate the Election Three Congressmen have asked the General Accounting Office, a federal agency, to investigate the election, citing questionable results in Ohio, Florida, North Carolina and California. Click here to see their letter to the GAO:

http://forum.therandirhodesshow.com/index.php?act=ST&f=87&t=34711 REMEMBER THESE FOUR POINTS:

A. Bush's approval numbers were CONSISTENTLY below 50% throughout the campaign.

B. New Democratic registrations in Ohio were 10 times that of Republicans, and in Florida, Democrats held a similar but somewhat smaller advantage.

C. All the polls that were still giving Bush leads after the debates were within the margin of error, and when the undecideds started making up their minds over the last weekend, Kerry's poll numbers were surging.

D. The $10 million exit-poll system, specifically designed not to fail this time, clearly showed, in the original reports, a Kerry victory.

OTHER VOICES TO HEAR:

Here are other voices which are beginning to question the legitimacy of the recent election. Here are some of them. (Reassemble any long links which have been broken by your browser's settings.)

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/kerry_won.php

http://americablog.blogspot.com/archives/2004_10_31_americablog_archive.html#109\970362694815839

http://www.ecotalk.org/VotingSecurity.htm

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/article.php?sid=18588&mode=&order=0

Here is a report of voter complaints in 7 Southern states:

http://www.abcnews4.com/news/stories/1104/185549.html

There may still be time to do something about this before the Electoral College meets on December 13th.

The first step is to immerse ourselves in the facts. The second step is to encourage the mainstream media to take the issue. They will only do that if they feel there is considerable popular concern. The local and regional press, and the alternative media, have been doing their jobs; now we need the national press to do its job, too.

If you are concerned about this election being stolen, please do two things:

1. Send your concerns to everyone you know, both inside and outside the United States.

2. Send your concerns to the major news organizations. A list of contacts appears at the end of this message. ***(this list not with message sent to me but you can get media contacts for your state at http://www.hometownnews.com )

-----------------------------------------------

THE LETTER FROM KERRY WORKERS IN BROWARD COUNTY, FLA.:

"Spurred by the unwillingness of the broadcast media to report voting problems during the 2004 election race, we want to alert others to the widespread voter suppression and disenfranchisement that occurred in Broward County, Florida. We staffed the emergency hotline for the Kerry Campaign Headquarters in Broward County from late October through the election.

All of us were devastated by the margin of Bush's win in Florida, particularly since polls predicted the race would be extremely close.

Many of the calls to our hotline were from voters who had pressed the Kerry button on their electronic voting screen, only to have Bush light up as the candidate they had chosen. In some cases, this would happen repeatedly until about the 5th or 6th time the voter pressed Kerry and eventually his name would light up. In other cases, the voters pushed Kerry but were later asked to confirm their Bush vote.

We had calls about a road block, put up by the police at 7am on Nov. 2, which blocked road access to two precinct locations in majority black districts. There was no justification for the road block no accident or crime scene or construction.

Many of our calls dealt with voter suppression, or manipulation, of the Haitian population, occurrences which seem too numerous, and their targets too indefensible, as primarily poor, first-time-voter, Creole-speaking refugees, to be anything but systemic. In one example, a voter whose hands were bandaged could not press the touch- screen himself; he asked the non-partisan election official to press Kerry for him, but the election official pressed Bush and sent his vote immediately into the machine.

Many, many others were denied the right to vote and were not given provisional ballots, while others were refused assistance at the polls, even though provisional ballots and voter assistance are legal rights.

Others were told they had already voted and were turned away, although they had never voted previously. This latter experience was a complaint not isolated to Haitians but also included other surprised voters with no recourse except their word against that of the Supervisor of Elections.

We spoke with hundreds of voters who were certain they had registered to vote in the past 6 months, well before the October 18 deadline, but were not on the rolls. And those were just the people who had the information to contact us.

The local paper, citing the Supervisor of Elections office as its source, told all people voting by absentee ballot that they could turn in ballots by hand to any of its seven offices by 5pm on Tuesday, Nov. 2.

Every single one of those offices except one was closed on Tuesday.

We had numerous calls from voters on Nov. 2 whose precincts had closed, yet the Supervisor of Elections office had given voters no notification of the closure, and no notification of where to go to vote.

Thousands of people were likely disenfranchised because of inexcusable mishaps such as this. We had many calls from people who had been harassed by poll workers, who were turned away without being allowed the right to vote provisionally (another breech of voter rights). Other people were turned away because the address on their drivers license did not match the address on their voter registration card; again, this is in direct violation of election law.

All of these problems do not even take into account the 58,000 absentee ballots that had been lost by the Supervisor of Elections, in perhaps the most democratic county in the state, disenfranchising thousands of people who were disabled, out of the country, or elderly and unable get to the polls. These events, and many others, have been documented and also reported to lawyers, but we fear they will not get the attention they deserve. This is what we witnessed in just one county. We believe that these "voting irregularities" raise serious concerns about the legitimacy of the results in Florida, and more broadly, about the health of democracy in this country."

note: I did not write this article; it came to me in an email and the author was not indicated. Most of what is written in this article is substaniated by many other published articles and reports, most of which are available on the "Stolen Election?" website.

http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?id=1&display=rednews/2004/11/04/build/wyoming/35-voter-turnout.inc

The Wyoming Secretary of State's office counted 245,646 voters unofficially, statewide. The number of registered voters before Tuesday's election was 232,396, meaning the ultimate voter turnout among registered voters was about 106 percent. Voter turnout percentage highest since 1978.



Associated Press
CHEYENNE - Wyoming voters turned out for Tuesday's general election in numbers not seen in the last 26 years, causing some counties to rush extra ballots to precincts. The Secretary of State's office counted 245,646 voters unofficially statewide. That is 65 percent of the 376,359 residents who are eligible to vote in the state. "This was an exciting election day in Wyoming, with many people registering at the polls," Secretary of State Joe Meyer said Wednesday.

Tuesday's election turnout exceeded the number of registered voters in the state, Meyer said. The number of registered voters before Tuesday's election was 232,396, meaning the ultimate voter turnout among registered voters was about 106 percent, Meyer said.

http://www.fairelections.org

http://www.verifedvoting.org

http://www.votersunite.org

http://www.votergate.tv

http://www.uscountvote.org

http://www.nov3.us

Media Blackout on Election Fraud by Media News Group

http://denvervoice.org/features/Nov_2004/who_is_the_denver_post.htm

A really fascinating article that makes an excellent case for the fact there is a media blackout on election fraud.

[rvgwinn]

1. ONE WORD

COUP D'ETAT

[corbett]

2. Most Comprehensive Listing Yet! Wow!

Kudos!

Kicking for the truth!

[Darknyte7]

3. Kicking...

:kick:

[k8conant]

4. Thank you...

:kick:

[Kelvin Mace]

5. Exterme Caution pointing anyone to Bev Harris

As has been well documented here, she is in this for the money and has betrayed and attacked numerous BBV advocates to further her own ambitions.

David Allen
www.thoughtcrimes.org

[Miami Liberal]

6. Thank you for posting this. n/t

[Wilms]

7. Great reference.

Can this be reposted from time to time?