Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Asks Judge to Toss Ohio Election Suit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:49 PM
Original message
Bush Asks Judge to Toss Ohio Election Suit
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 07:52 PM by utopiansecretagent
Bush Asks Judge to Toss Ohio Election Suit

4 minutes ago

By ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS, Associated Press Writer

COLUMBUS, Ohio - President Bush (news - web sites)'s re-election campaign asked the chief justice of the Ohio Supreme Court on Monday to throw out a challenge of the election in this swing state, saying the case resembles "a poorly drafted script for a late night conspiracy-theory movie."

The court filing was made as the Rev. Jesse Jackson (news - web sites) held a rally before hundreds of people in Columbus to support the challenge and urge the U.S. Senate to debate Ohio's results on Thursday when Congress is in joint session for the official tally of the electoral votes.

Thirty-seven Ohio voters who filed the challenge are asking Chief Justice Thomas Moyer to set aside the election results. Some of the voters are suspicious of Bush's victory over Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites), while others say hours-long waits in heavily black neighborhoods caused voters to leave in frustration without casting a ballot.

"In 2000, if Al Gore (news - web sites) had just held on and fought to the bitter end, he would have been president," said Mark Lomax, a black Columbus musician challenging the vote. "I kind of have the same feeling now — whether or not you like John Kerry, that's not the issue. It's just that your vote counts."
(snip/...)

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&ncid=696&e=1&u=/ap/20050104/ap_on_el_pr/ohio_vote

edit:fixed link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. bad link. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Never mind
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 07:54 PM by bemis12
*deleted on edit*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. link fixed.........n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Me Thinks...................
BushCo. doth protest too much". If it's as bad suit as they say it is, the court wouldn't even hear it, correct?
Let the court make it's decision, Bozos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Then they fight you
Then you win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. Problem is the court is Moyer
Moyer gets to make the descission and he has a law suite filled against him contesting his election as Supreme Court Justice of Ohio.

The court, (Moyer) will throw it out. I'm positive of that.

They have control now, and there is very little we can do, but PROTEST! Our Government has been taken over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Methinks the fvckers are getting scared
or they wouldn't have bothered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, thanks.
"I kind of have the same feeling now — whether or not you like John Kerry, that's not the issue. It's just that your vote counts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not "Bush" but a flunky. He has more important things to do...
...and crushing responsible protests to election fraud is HARD WORK.

Let's hope the judge isn't another Scalia. I do wonder what threats may have accompanied this "request" behind the scenes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. BushCo is panicking.
They'll try to dismiss it as another "frivolous lawsuit." Well, since WHEN did a voter's rights become frivolous?

If the media were truly "liberal," they'd point this out.

http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues.15032002
http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues.15133215
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
headrock Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Read The Last Paragraph...
If nothings done by the 6th the case goes bye bye in regards to getting the electors tossed out and I really dont think that Moyers is dumb enough to take it on before Thursday..If your looking to get the electors tossed this isnt going to get it done...........

A realist:-)

The 6th will be where election reform will be placed front and center and hopefully multiple Senators will make a stand for African American voters who are shitted on year after year..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's a standard response
The defendant does get to respond to a suit. It's how it works. Responding is neither a sign of panic, nor a desparation move. It happens in every case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Well, since you presume to know Bush**'s mind, tell me why...
...he responded at all.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. It don't claim to know his mind.
I know something of how lawsuits work.

Plaintiff files case.
Defendant responds.

Check out Bush v. Gore.

Bush filed.
Gore responded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femme.democratique Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. So they respond *THREE WEEKS* after the initial filing......
Why not come out with a statement when the case was actually filed? Was Rove too busy masturbating to his picture of Il Duce?

This is all timed SO PRECISELY its almost funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. Yea. But WHAT a response.
Bush is all..."Those tin-foil people, whatever, you know, their smokin' me out."

HAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
85. Is it standard for a president to ask that a state supreme justice
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 03:38 AM by 8_year_nightmare
throw out a case that was filed on behalf of voters? I call that more than a "response".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why ask now?
What are they hiding and why and the whiff of fear...hmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
57. Because now was thier deadline.
If I remembered that right, too lazy to look it up.

Running the clock. The republican strategy.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. Late Friday's in the dead of night is more the * MO.
Why today rather than when everything could have been buried over the weekend. just wondering is all... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #62
77. Moyer set the deadline for the reply to the allegations. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTGold Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm shocked - sounds like great news for us!!
At the VERY least I think it shows that they know there are enough disenfranchised votes to turn the state over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Unfortunately, Repug Moyers will stall until after 1/6 to make his ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hope he does. That makes him overtly complicit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. YESSSSSSSSSSS...
"...then they fight you."
- M.Gandhi

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Farmgirl Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ay Carumba!
Does anyone out there know which way the judge might be leaning on this? Does anyone know, or think that he might in fact decide to "throw out the challenge" -- or does this seem more like grandstanding and posturing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Since the judges legitimacy was also in question and he chose to
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:15 PM by bush_is_wacko
separate the two cases with one ruling and then ruled to delay them a little longer, and then told the Attorney he had not given enough evidence, blah, blah, blah. I think he will probably do everything in his power to keep the case from being heard until it is too late. However, if there is any investigating going on, this judge has made a pretty good case for Arnbeck that he IS corrupt and HIS election results SHOULD be questioned along with Bush's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Sounds like they stepped in a trap!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Could be..Let's wait and see! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. His election results are being questioned.
Arnbecks first law suite contested the election for president and for the Supreme Court Justice of Ohio, which is Moyer. Moyer threw the law suite out, saying they must be filed separate. Now Moyer is the JUDGE for the presidential election contest.

It is all corrupt!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #47
76. Yeah, it's corrupt, but there may be a method to the madness
Moyer has ruled and re-ruled and undermined this whole thing so much, he may get called on some of it down the line. It's so convoluted to an outsider, I can't quite see how things could turn in our direction, but I can see the possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. I sure hope you are right. Crosing my fingers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. At first I thought somebody made this up. It COULD NOT be true!
Oh, man. Excuse me while I throw up. :grr: :nuke:
Michael Moore's new movie should be Apocalypse 2004
Should I bend over now, or do you want to kiss me first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
20.  this opening paragraph
Reminds me of the way FAUX News and O'Lielly started cross suits against Franken.


"COLUMBUS, Ohio - President Bush (news - web sites)'s re-election campaign asked the chief justice of the Ohio Supreme Court on Monday to throw out a challenge of the election in this swing state, saying the case resembles "a poorly drafted script for a late night conspiracy-theory movie."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
40. Putting an order in for the same result:
Judge laughs * out of court....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madison2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. How utterly dismissive Blackwell is to black voters and Jesse Jackson:

Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell said there's no reason to prolong the election. "Jesse Jackson can complain, grandstand, whine, stamp his feet all he wants," said Blackwell spokesman Carlo LoParo. "It's not going to change the results of Ohio's election or how voters cast their ballots on Nov. 2."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
headrock Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Well,For Everyone Whos Says Its Just About Counting The Votes
should be pleased but those who thought it would get Kerry in there might be disappointed..........

Keep fighting Bob....

-"Bob Fitrakis, one of the lawyers who filed the challenge, said that if Moyer's decision comes after the tally by Congress, it likely wouldn't have any effect on the outcome of the presidential election. But any ruling favorable to the challengers — regardless of when — would bolster their efforts to improve voting law, he said."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. We don't want to change "how voters cast their ballots"
We want to verify that they were counted correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. Yeah, actually I do want to change how voters cast their votes
Either we have a buddy system, where someone goes in with you watches you vote and signs a written, enforceable document witnessing that you did vote that way or we go to paper ballots with a receipt! I am taking a buddy w/ me to the next election if we don't have verifiable paper ballots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #44
81. Agree totally but, for this election it's the best we can do.
Not counting a country-wide revote, of course. I would like to go for paper ballots or machines with a paper trail.

All paper ballots can go into very heavily guarded LOCKED BOXES (hee!), we can get the machine tally for a quick idea of who got what for a vote but no even calling the race until the paper votes are counted (and possibly videotaped).

If we can spend untold millions on a long campaign season, we can take the time and money to COUNT THE FREAKING VOTES.

If we can't verify the talley, we cannot trust our election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. Yep, that's it!
"If we can spend untold millions on a long campaign season, we can take the time and money to COUNT THE FREAKING VOTES.

If we can't verify the talley, we cannot trust our election."

In a nutshell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. Such nasty words from Blackwell...
Blackwell needs to read up on his own book of ethics.
It makes me sick. !@#F$# SOB!

From The Desk Of Kenneth Blackwell:
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/pubAffairs/general/uncommonsensebooklet.pdf#search='kenneth%20blackwell%20ethics'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #51
61. Indeed! I almost fell out of my chair
ALL of it is incredibly hypocritical, but how about #19...

"Submission to the truth..." bla,bla,bla
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #51
65.  "a poorly drafted script for a late night conspiracy-theory movie."
a condensending comment!!--


from your Yahoo post:

COLUMBUS, Ohio - President Bush (news - web sites)'s re-election campaign asked the chief justice of the Ohio Supreme Court on Monday to throw out a challenge of the election in this swing state, saying the case resembles "a poorly drafted script for a late night conspiracy-theory movie."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
67. yes-blackwell is dismissive!! condensending also!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Please have hope - realize what good news this is for the investigation!
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:13 PM by FreepFryer
Read the tone, read the frame.

The tone is even, and exposes Replunk vitriol contrasted with Dem thoughtfulness.

It establishes the validity of a followup to the 2000 precedent.

The frame here is 'investigation valid'.

Good stuff. Now, let's see what the judge does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m.standridge Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
53. What Judge Rehnquist-Moyers will do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. I like the schoolyard name-calling aspect to it.
BTW, how many insults is it to call something "a poorly drafted script for a late night conspiracy-theory movie"?

I think I count about five.

Much better than saying something like "plaintiffs lack standing" or "we move to vacate in the absence of prima facia evidence."

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. yes
Of course he never bothers with validity or reality. He makes his own reality - doncha know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. That Bush. He's so "plain-spoken".
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Yeeeah!
That's why we all loves him so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vj68 Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I think the MSM can’t ignore it
I think the MSM can’t ignore it and that is Good News. Maybe the filling will pull the election fraud news into the living room of every person with a TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
59. Funny you should mention Prima Facia ;)
Isn't there some of that involved in this when the evidence is presented?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #59
79. Winkin' right back at ya, hoot.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #79
89. Stop that people will talk...
Not that there's anything wrong with that.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. LOL!
Gotta keep myself from breaking into a show tune. Say, something from "Carousel"...

"Don't laugh,
At my jokes too much..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
32. This quote
is so not funny!

"a poorly drafted script for a late night conspiracy-theory movie."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Their framing is sooooo transparent, isn't it?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. Bush must be worried
.. why else would he ask Moyer to throw out the law suite?
There is absolutely no reason for Bush to ask this of Moyer unless he has something to hide. PERIOD.

I think Bush is scared, but the big problem is Moyer. He will throw it out weather Bush asks him to or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. yep, my thought too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
42. First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you...
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:44 PM by FreepFryer
... Then you win. -- Mohandas Gandhi

(had to post the whole thing here for those who didn't get the mention above).

Believe! Achieve! Care! Protect! It's working!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. it's "Gandhi"
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:42 PM by foo_bar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. it was a typo from fast typing
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:44 PM by FreepFryer
Thanks for the snark, though.

You may notice it misspelled similarly in one of your links, smartypants. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:46 PM
Original message
(cookie dupe)
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:47 PM by foo_bar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. it's one of the most common misspellings
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:46 PM by foo_bar
In fact there's some research devoted to it:
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001006.html

Typos don't generally swap the 2nd and 5th letters, for the record.

What this means in the case of Gandhi is that people know there is an "h" in there somewhere, and just one of them, but they're not too sure where it is. As a result, the omission of the "h" after the "d" and the insertion of an "h" after the "g" are not statistically independent processes.

It's no doubt also relevant, in this case, that "gh" is a commoner sequence of letters in English than "dh" is, by a large factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. for the record
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:48 PM by FreepFryer
Can we talk about the topic and not whether i proofread that post? Super.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. "Honest differences are often a healthy sign of progress."
- Mahatma Gandhi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. {smile}
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 08:59 PM by FreepFryer
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
43. Just when I think that nothing else can surprise me...
I think they believe that NOBODY in this country pays attention! Maybe they are just too arrogant to give a crap!! Out of Rove's playbook, perhaps? Uh-oh...not the Rovian Theory of Democratic Principles!!!:cry:
Watch the locusts spread...



WHAT ARE THEY HIDING???:think: :think: :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam97 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. To those who were saying this lawsuit is a joke
here's your proof - I don;t think Rove wd ask Bush to do this if there wasn't a threat in here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatscott15 Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Why are the repubs even bothering?
Does make you wonder why they would even bother asking for it to be thrown out. Unless there is something there. The question is , will we ever know for sure? I doubt it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
49. Sorry we can't get Kerry in, but we can try to save democracy.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
60. Are they calling Karl Rove a hack B Grade Movie writer?Its his script.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
63. Does anyone have
a copy of, or link to, the papers filed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. I think all of them are here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
75. Thanks for the links!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #68
82. Thanks. Notice anything strange about the depositions?
First of all, the three Doctors are not notary publics and diplomates or whatever (that was a reference to the court reporter).

Interesting that no lawyer from the contestees showed up. That makes me think that the pukes think that the judge will toss the suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmc777 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
64. When government spokesmen/women say "conspiracy theory"....
......it's a sure sign that you have them on the run! :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. hahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Bush prob. labels the suit as 'frivulous"--one of the few big words he
knows!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. No way
His lawyer knew it. He's googling it right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #69
80. If * said it - it would be fri-vu-lous
don't forget the dramatic pause that he throws in when he thinks he's right. He thinks this claim is one of the ex-a-ger-a-tions but we know better.

You can run *, but you can't hide from this one! He should have paid more attention to the Nixon legacy I think!

When DID he know? Who is he protecting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
72. Breaking: Big Costco truck delivery of anti-perspirent to WH just reported
:nopity:


"When Did Bush Know?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
73. What's the matter, Boy George?
Getting scared?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
74. discussing this now on Air America Radio 10:05 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adolfo Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
83. kick!
The smell of blood in the water can be so sweet. I hope the legal sharks feast on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
86. First they laugh
Then they ignore, now they fight.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
87. Haha
Late night hmm are they refering to the exit poll doing a flip flop haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
88. Wow! He woke up!
Tee-hee....

"a poorly drafted script for a late night conspiracy-theory movie."
Did he add a "yeee-hawww" at the end, and spit a wad of tobacco into a styrofoam cup?

WHAT A BUFFOON.

Well, if he's getting defensive, he KNOWS they're onto something!Remember how nervous and jittery he got in the debates when Kerry reamed his lily-white ass for screwing up in Iraq? He got all defensive when Kerry hit the nail on the head.

Looks like he's getting scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
91. What are they hiding and how long can they hide it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC