Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Clinton on Larry King: "Bush won fair and square"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:22 AM
Original message
President Clinton on Larry King: "Bush won fair and square"
He said this only moments ago. What do you conspiracy "believers" have to say about that? Is Bill Clinton a freeper? Is he a part of the massive plot to keep Kerry out of the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
disillusioned1 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. One word
Mena
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I see
Bill Clinton is part of the Great Conspiracy. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned1 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. He's not lily white, if that's what you think
If you do, you belong in the Relgious Right. It even rhymes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intensitymedia Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #22
85. He was a liberal republican president anyway
Nafta.

Terminating the single payer health care proposal.

Squandered democratic majorities in congress.

Brought on the Newt Gingrich onslaught.

Lied and got caught.

These kinds of things are what we expect of republicans.

I like clinton in some ways. EAIT. Balancing a budget and calling the republican lie into the light - that they wanted a balanced budget, which of course was the last thing they wanted. They only used that as an excuse to avoid funding social programs.

By comparison to now, Clinton seems like a saint. But he was no Franklin Roosevelt, not even a Lyndon Johnson in his effect on the USA.

We should expect and deserve more.

Why did he say 'fair and square'?

Because he's a liar. Or a dupe. Or complicit.

There are no other alternatives.

peace - but never give up the struggle -

che (aka eso garbantho)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #85
99. I agree with you assessment. Fuck him and anyone with half a brain
who denies the reality of fraWd. I say it it is time for a tea party. We need to dump the e-machines and the DLC (who Clinton is very much a part of).

If no Democratic Senator stands for truth and democracy on the 6th then we must solidify our efforts behind a third party. Elect local and national candidate's and reform election laws now.

To accomplish this obviously we need to go back to the future and demand paper ballots NOW, and hand counts NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
79. JESSE JACKSON SAID "FAIR & SQUARE". SO DID MICHAEL MOORE
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 01:07 AM by TruthIsAll
GET READY FOR JAN. 6

YOU WILL BE AMAZED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wait a second...
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 12:24 AM by seito
Is he a Bonesman also LMAO

On Edit: I BELIEVE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Could be a Bonesman ....HAHHAHAHAHAHA n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
36. No, wait, he was in with Kerry and Rove
in the secret mind probe experiment used to rig the Iowa Caucus

Here is the prototype

I think I will keep my :tinfoilhat: in place thank you very much

I Believe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
59. Oh yea
I think I read something about that on CNN...:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #36
63. I Believe
you are correct. Their mind control is legendary. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
65. LOL! Just got the joke Pam-Moby. Very funny. HEE! Hee! Juvenile but
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 12:55 AM by Verve
funny.

Hey! Clinton is a politician everyone. I love the guy and would much rather have him in the Big house than Chimpy but he knows how to play with the big guys.

His motives aren't always clear to me. Which I'm sure is the way he wants it. (If you had Ken Starr following you around all those years you would be elusive as well.)

What he says may not be what he's thinking. I think he has ulterior motives if you ask me. He's kissing the Bushies' way too much lately. I wonder what's up behind the scenes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ah, Clinton is starting Hillary's campaign?
But then what does fair and square mean to a politician?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angelique Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
83. But then what does fair and square mean to a politician?
It means don't look behind the black curtain, just listen to what it says.. :)
As for the Clinton's, I can't shake the feeling that if it wasn't for the Clinton admin, and Big Bad Bill in particular.. we would be dancing in the White House and still have both arms of congress.. far and square..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. 3: Hillary in 08.
What did we expect him to say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. The answer will be, "He's working behind the scenes"
That's always the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euler Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Yes! In these situations...
...you have to read between the lines. Nothing is ever what it seems. Objective reality is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton owes his wife a favor after the --
-- Lewinsky affair.

Yes, it's in his interest to keep Kerry out of the White House.

No, I do not believe Bush won the election "fair and square." I believe he and his boys cheated like a slum rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Clinton did campaign for Kerry
so I'm not sure what I think of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. Yes, he did, but only some.
He had his elective surgery during the presidential campaign so he would not be an agent to his wife's not getting the nomination in '08.

I'm not saying he did not have to have the operation. I am relying on his doctor's comments that the surgery was elective in its timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. He had a fucking bypass
It's not like he got a tummy tuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. The medical perspective in Clinton's case --
-- was "selective surgery," in due course.

As I stated, the operation was necessary -- no question. The timing was what I questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. Crusoe, I agree with you. I think Hillary made him select that week
to do it ....to put distance between them and Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. It had been whispered here and there in DC --
-- and on some of the blogs.

Hillary's bid for the White House would have been greatly hampered by a Kerry-Edwards win.

Dubya is a disaster for democracy, but her wait is down to 4 years and not a potential 8 for Kerry and then another potential 8 more for Edwards.

No clinical proof, but that's one rumor out there along the Potomac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. That's the rumor on right-wing blogs.
And I still can't see how you can justify arguing that Clinton should have ignored the ticking time bomb in his chest and spent a week in Columbus pressing flesh for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #57
72. I argue it simply because his surgery --
-- was necessary, yes, but imminently urgent, no.

That's what the docs said at the press conference.

Argue with their analysis of his health if you want.

As to right wing blogs: I don't read them or participate in them. You inaccuractly isolate the range of rumor in American political life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #43
80. Yeah, me too. He came into the game late enough to be the hero...
but not early enough to truly help.

And even his comments today really don't surprise me...since I never considered Clinton a real "Dem." He always seemed like a Remocrat to me. Even aside from his "affairs," I always basically mistrusted him. Something about him reminded me of a 'weasal.' I had to turn the volume down on the TV every time he was on...much like I had to with Reagan and the two Shrubs...'cause what he was saying just never "felt" true.

Though he IS charismatic...will hand him that. Though "charming" is not what I look for in a Politician. Give me real 'substance' any day.

So I'm not surprised at his recent alignment with Shrub...and lining-up of Hillary for '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:40 AM
Original message
this is the best explanation ever, he owes Hillary!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Opinions are like assholes; everybody's got one.
That's Clinton's opinion. It isn't mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam97 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. good one
and yes, its for Hillary but its not going to work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
64. This is what I've said all along
I won't vote for Hillary. No way, no how. She may be a smart woman, but I don't think she represents my opinions and I don't think she is electable. And I am sick of seeing Bill cozying up to the Bush's.

The thought has occurred to me that this entire farce of Clinton cozying up, Kerry conceding so early, is all in an effort to "protect the public" from breaking out in civil disobedience. Civil disobedience could make it easier for terrorists to attack. the government would have to take it's eye off of the Iraq ball and mass chaos would break out. Our government isn't even communicating effectively from within. How the heck would they be able to coordinate efforts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, the Ukraine, AND America?

Now there's a real :tinfoilhat: kinda theory for the one who started this post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. pretty fucked up
this truely is bizarro world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. I know, I hate that he said it.
Does he know about Ohio or is he ignoring it? What about republicans owning the electronic voting machines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why are we here? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
32. Thanks, Patsy. I needed that! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
40. You will find your answer here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. He also said, "I did not have sexual relations with that young woman."
So, I shall reserve judgement until D-day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. No - I'm thinking he just hasn't looked into the evidence
The corporate media isn't reporting it and I'm doubting the Big Dawg has a whole lotta time to spend searching for it on the Internet(s).

However, I would like to hear what Al Gore has to say about it.

Besides - I'm not a conspiracy believer. I simply want an investigation to that we have audited voting machines that contain paper trails, I want to stop voter suppression and I want to see every vote count. I don't have high hopes for a Kerry inauguration, but I would like to see the neo-cons frog-marched out of the White House for sticking it to the voters. I'll put up with Hastert for a couple of years until the people vote the facists out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euler Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. He's in on the whole thing.
He was hypnotized by the fundies midway through his second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. If Clinton WAS part of the conspiracy to keep Kerry out of the WH..
...would you believe it? No. You have already made up your mind. I don't care about the conspiracy theories. But there is more than enough proof of election fraud and we the people deserve an investigation. Perhaps Bill thinks it is in the best interest of the country to move on despite election fraud. Ever think of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Well yes that has crossed my mind-But that all n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
46.  So he thinks a little fraud is best to be ignored in the best interests
of the country? How can Bush or a stolen election ever be in the best interests of the country? I believe we proved in 2000 that we should have had a civil war if necessarry in order to protect the vote! Screw Clinton. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #46
73. I agree, and we must stop election fraud now, or it will continue
Unfortunately our media seems deathly afraid to even consider the possibility of election fraud. That's the part that should bother everyone. Whether it happened or not, why will NO media organization even investigate? We deserve an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. I don't know what to think about it...
...but the high opinion I've always had of him just took a nosedive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam97 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Lets write to Hillary
and say sayonara apropos those comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
21. http://www.redefeatbush.com/ (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
25. Lots of people believe Bush won. What's your point?
That Clinton knows something we don't? That if it comes from the mouth of Clinton (no jokes...) it's gospel? :shrug:

Clinton has a right to his opinion, uninformed as it may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
27.  Clinton said that? If he did and I don't doubt you, I will NEVER support
anything he does again. It will be over, finito. I will set fire to his book! Centrism has helped ruin the Democratic Party and there he sits with the archbastard Poppy. I have had it. I am checking out this statement, just to be fair and then throwing out all Clinton memorabilia! Proves ANYONE that supported and continues support of the DLC can't be trusted.This makes me soooo mad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #27
88. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
100. He said it
I heard him say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
28. Bill lost me when we failed to life economic sanctions in Iraq --
leading to the deaths of 100,000's of children. Today he showed up with Pappy Bush to ask people to donate money to the fund to help victims of the tsunami. When do you think ex-presidents will ask us all to donate money to people around the world whose lives have been destroyed by the war criminal-presidents who have held office since 1980? 1950? And, remember agent orange and depleted uranium are the gifts that keep on giving for generations!

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
29. Depends on the definition of what won is...
He is entitled to say what he wants - doesn't mean there is a requirement to say that's is the final word!

Investigate fully and fairly, that is all that's being asked. Then let the evidence speak for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. Depends on
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 01:00 AM by Carolab
what the definition of "fair and square" is.

It isn't cheating if you don't inhale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
31. he also said at the library he is the only guy that likes both bush
and kerry. he also didnt stand up for gore in 2000 when we knew florida was fucking gore

he has on many occassions supported bush for example bush going to iraq and giving us lies and he validated bush decision. did it while kerry was running too, dont remember the specifics.

so why clinton did this, what is motive is, i dont know, i dont care. i havent trust clinton ever. he was a good president, but certainly did things i didnt agree with. not a huge fan. but i dont trust him either

and doesnt convince me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. and he signed the bill that led to the press being a repuke
propaganda arm--happily, as I read recently

He sucks, pure and simple.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
49. Yeah, my dad, was a dentist who saw a lot of poor people and he hated
Clinton for what he did to welfare. He loved the sex scandal though.

I personally didn't trust Clinton from the moment I first saw his face on the cover of Newsweek with Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
52. and he was a draft dodger, no matter what, Bush and Clinton never
served in a war. Kerry did and got smeared nationally for it, just like McCain did. This is a sick crew....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #52
58. Well, let's break out every right-wing talking point while we're at it...
Why not blame oral sex in junior high hallways on Clinton too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #58
76. Whatever. He may as well be a Republican at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:34 AM
Original message
Never underestimate Bill Clinton. You didn't hear the
subordinate clause he didn't say out loud.

"if you figure that Republican machines run by Republican fatcats gave the vote to the Dim Son. And now I'm on the disaster trail, so they can't completely co-opt it. Sure, Bush won faaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiir and square."

Give me a break. Don't you hear some judicious outright LYING when you hear it?

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
34. A bush presidency helps Hillary
I thought I remembered that one of the reasons Kerry conceded is that he was given the word by some major democrats they would not support him contesting the election. (Perhaps I am wrong about that; if I am, someone please correct me).

I thought at the time that the 'major democrats' would include the Clintons. I honestly think they see bush's 're-election' as an advantage for Hillary.

Truthfully, I like Bill and I thought he was a good President. But, I have become disillusioned with the both of them. I think they are very focused on getting Hillary into the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
35. Clinton is the world's politician
He's gotten both Bushs' eating off his lap.

Clinton is a master the world won't again see. I watched him denigrate a reporter using velvet gloves. The reporter said "Shouldn't have Bush acted before 4 days?". Clinton responded "why are you talking about this when thousands are dead?"

He makes both Bush's look the novices they are.

He plays a chess game we can't see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPriest Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
37. Shit, another hit-and-run. Damn, I'm going to have to catch
these faster! :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #37
70. Thanks for pointing that out
I didn't catch it until you posted this.
Seem to be quite a few of these today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
38. You all forget that the the Dems ...
and Repubs are the same party... They all just want money and power and 'screw everybody else'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
39. I've always thought that if they actually get to dig into voter fraud
that they would find both sides participated. though obviously the pugs really went to a new level with it this time. As much as I like Clinton, I have always thought that he has secrets that he needs to keep. No special reasons just feelings.
For him to have mentioned it, means that they are very concerned about us. They have been trying to slam us in the media and now this? It may be that we are onto just the tip of the ol iceberg, as they say, of a whole big mess. You don't think the Clintons would miss the bus for the new world order do ya?:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. i felt this a couple weeks ago really strongly.
just yelled out what are the dems hiding. i dont give it shit what party is doing what. screw them all, i want it all on the table. we will start a whole new party. but screw clinton telling me everything wwas fair when we saw with our own eyes and so much suggestion of other things that all was NOT fair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. The DLC Gods have spoken. They want us to get over it.
They are working hand in hand with the Repukes to create a one-party nation. Call me a liar. Just wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anaxarchos Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
44. He should have inhaled. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #44
87. a shitload of people NEED TO inhale. pop some pills. run a mile.
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 01:16 AM by AgadorSparticus
have sex. whatever. but this world would be a hell of a lot nicer to live in if they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
47. The good guys have a plan
Clinton is a part of it, but I'll be damned if I can figure out exactly where it's going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. It's leading to a Bush speech on Jan 20
A lot of people are really close to have their hearts broken twice in three months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #50
60. A lot of people should have listened to the saner voices
rather than believing those who told them what they wanted to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
51. Obviously no one bothered to send Clinton documentation: serious mistake
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 12:46 AM by berniew1
Clinton still has a lot of influence and Media power; it was an extremely serious mistake not sending him documentation of the widespread voter suppression and vote machine fraud in Ohio, Florida, and New Mexico. Its obvious one can't depend on the media to do it.
For example:
http://www.flcv.com/fraudpat.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #51
67. You are relentless - keep up the good work! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
54. Clinton--best Republican President ever.
That's my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
55. who expected anything from clinton. i didnt
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 12:46 AM by seabeyond
i am not suprised. the senate and reps and every other dem is saying it is fair. so...........

they are wrong

i dont know the game, ........maybe sometime in history we will know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
56. Clinton ain't nuthin' but Joe Lieberman in bib overalls. Fuck'm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
61. Simple explanation. That is what he believes.
Outside of DU and similar sites, everybody believes that W actually did win. Even some DUers think the same thing, but they have learned that if thay say that here, they will be badly flamed.

That is why I extremely doubt that any senator will issue a challenge on Jan 6. They all think that he really won, and they don't want to be seen as internet conspiracy kooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
62. Maybe Clinton Wishes to Be Known As the Good Guy
beloved by the world, while Bush is a total -----up, seen as just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
66. Well, I would say this about that!
There are a multitude of theories that could explain Clinton's statement. It could be that the "operation" was really an opportunity for Rove & Co. to implant a controlling device in his brain and now they have their very own presidential puppet. I don't believe that, but it makes great fodder.

I personally think that now that he isn't President, he is much freer to start dating again and that probably has kept him from really diving into the vote fraud issue. Did you notice his multi-colored hippie friendship bracelet? I wonder if there is a special someone that asked him to wear it on TV as a secret sign that only they know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
68. What if he's wrong? I guess we'll never know. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #68
75. Maybe One needs to simplify the direction between Clinton & Bush
Clinton led us into peace and prosperity. Where has Bush led us and who has profited from his warmongering?

That is the defference between a man who knows how to bring peace and one who knows how to bring war. Guess which one I would take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
69. I swear to G_d, I actually think he is!!!! He is one of the DLC leaders!!!
Those of us who hate the DLC were very disappointed to realize that Clinton was one of their major cheerleaders! Dear Lord, we liberals cringe at this display, even though we love Bill, and as we have found out later, he was one of the Democratic Leadership Council members! You're right; Bill, with all of his centrist proclivities, have disappointed many, many, liberals! He was the only Democrat we had! So what the hell are we supposed to do???? Really, we just cringe and pray for some liberal to rescue us! Right! I really believe that Bill and Hillary are liberals, BUT, cannot acknowledge that fact, due to the political fallout that would be inherent to them if they indicated the slightest liberal proclivity.....thus, they act as if they are fu**ing conservatives....and it drives me crazy!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #69
74. Found out later that he was in the DLC?
Was I the only person conscious in 1992?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vpigrad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
71. I think I know why he did it.
A county DNC chairman told me that Clinton probably whored-out himself in support of Bush in exchange for Bush's support for Clinton as the next head of the UN. Normally I discount theories like that, but this guy has been right every time I heard him say something like that.

In other words, Clinton is putting himself ahead of the party. The guy is great except for his tendency to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #71
77. Is possible - I put nothing past these power hungry money grubbing whores
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #77
82. that would also explain that Tsunami relief committee co-chair appointment
with EX-CIA CHIEF George I :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #71
81. well lets see if that happens, cause this makes the most sense
i can see bush doing it and i could see clinton doing it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
78. Hillary in 08 is the only answer
IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoses Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
84. & he did not have sexual relations with that woman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
86. Evidently Conyers hasn't met with him.
From what I've been reading, the Senators and Congressmen who've looked at his report have been completely unable to discredit it.

I do hope that this doesn't sway any Senators who were on the fence. The facts in an investigative report should speak louder than the words of an uninformed person--but still. I wish he'd kept his mouth shut.

And yeah, I agree, this is about Hillary. Every public thing Clinton does is done with an eye for the political import, and the fact is that if an investigation proves fraud took place, Kerry's automatically the frontrunner. Clinton is bound to know it.

I don't agree with all that Hillary has done (or failed to do), but I admire her as a strong woman. However, if she does run, I'm not likely to support her in the primaries. Some things are more important than politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
89. It was great to see the Bushs' licking Clinton's pants for scraps
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 01:26 AM by Erika
I have a feeling if Hillary chooses to do so she can increase it by ten fold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
90. What do you conspiracy "believers" have to say about that?
He voted for NAFTA and GATT, that's what I have to say about that. Clinton was and is a centrist AKA Republican Lite not Republican Reich like *. There are moderates and even some conservatives I can agree with on some things, both Democrat and Republican. I think Clinton is to the left of someone like Lieberman but far to the right of someone like Kucinich. I didn't vote for Clinton I voted for Perot. When the Republicans say Perot took away votes from them it's a lie. Perot is a liberal populist he took votes away from Clinton.

http://www.issues2000.org/Ross_Perot.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #90
91. i voted for perot. didnt trust clinton
and no way to bush 1. i voted for clinton the second time because of what the republicans did to him. now if you listen to him talk about what the repugs did to him, he doesnt go after them with that. and i saw what the repugs were doing was stomping on the constitution and totally abusing their power and so wanted clinton to rip into them and he never did. acted like it was just all part of the game. i am not into that kind of a game with our constitution. is this stealing of the election merely part of the game for clinton too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #91
93. Ask yourself that question
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 01:30 AM by Erika
W was a rich boy of parents who had ties with Saudia Arabia.

Clinton was a poor boy who had to depend on himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
92. No politician wants it to come out that they KNEW about election fraud
and have done nothing to stop it. That is why he said what he did. He's covering his ass, as well as the ass of the Democratic party. Also, I think Bill is having some fun taunting the other side. He's quite a wicked person at heart ya know. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. And that's why we love him. Smart, smart bad boy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #92
95. Ah,
No one even suspected Clinton of election fraud so what are you talking about? The Bushs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #92
96. Ah, Clinton was never accused of election fraud
So what are you talking about?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #96
102. He will always be president of the US, so he BETTER NOT know about electio
n fraud. (Or at least he must ACT surprised.) He has an image to maintain, not just his own, but our country's. Our fragile image of America, OUR country, which God loves above all other countries ya know, might be damaged otherwise. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #102
104. What are you talking about?
Clinton was never accused of any violation or knowledge of election fraud.

Are you talking about Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
97. Honest to G_d, I am just ready to just wring his fucking neck......
How in the hell can one POLITICIAN be so fucking clueless!!!!!! Good G_d almighty!!!!! Can that asshole!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #97
98. Don't talk about Bush that way
He doesn't let civil rights stand in his way. He could be five minutes away from your doorway right now. You may never be seen again. I'd send a lot of farewell emails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yojon Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
101. He too may not want to piss off the DLC
because if he does, they will cut Hillary loose.

Who said 'none are so blind as those who will not see?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #101
103. Cut Hillary loose?
What do you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
105. Didn't he also tell democrats, after the 2004 election, to change their
image?

Doncha just love masks? I prefer no masks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #105
107. Your point?
The Republicans are after Bush to change his image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jimmy D Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
106. Bill looking for a job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
108. Locking.
Flamebait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC