Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The first sign of fear-Bush asks ohio judge to throw out the people's case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
praisethelowered Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 08:54 PM
Original message
The first sign of fear-Bush asks ohio judge to throw out the people's case
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 09:01 PM by praisethelowered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KatieB Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link is not working
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
praisethelowered Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. fixed it. . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. thanks for the link
but old George don't care about the people in the US...people's case do not matter. Only what GWB wants....get it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impeachthescoundrel Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm almost afraid
to hope anymore at this point, but suddenly I read this and my suspicions are confirmed. An act of the guilty.

I have seen it before. Trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
praisethelowered Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. yes- it gives me hope
because Bush just entered the legal battle rather than ignoring it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes-sounds a tiny bit desperate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wouldn't read to much into
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 09:13 PM by righteous1
this. As a named defendent he had to respond in writing to the court. His only option was to request a dismissal or acquiesce to the plaintiff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
praisethelowered Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. was name calling mandatory. . .?
"late night conspiracy theory movie" isn't legal-ease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a coward!
Cowards fear the truth!:cry:

WHAT ARE THEY HIDING???:think: :think: :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC