Might wanna tune into Randi! n/t

[Darknyte7]

[tx_dem41]

1. She's bringing up a point ...

I did earlier....competing stories tomorrow between the electoral votes and the Gonzales hearing.

[renaissanceguy]

4. Shit. You have a point.

The MSM won't report this, and if they do, it'll be a little snippet.

http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues.15133215

[tx_dem41]

5. Bingo! n/t

[OrangeCountyDemocrat]

6. Talking Again About Kerry's Letter

[DoYouEverWonder]

7. We should asked the DEMS

who are going to be at the Gonzalez hearing, that under the circumstances they should postpone his confirmation hearing.

[tx_dem41]

8. Dems don't run the committee....its the Judiciary Committee. n/t

[DoYouEverWonder]

9. The DEM members

could ask for a postponement or just not show up. How many do they need for a quorum?

[tx_dem41]

10. All they need is the Republicans to show up and the hearing

would go on.

[DoYouEverWonder]

11. What are the quorum rules?

n/t

[tx_dem41]

12. To hold hearings? No quorum is needed.... n/t

[DoYouEverWonder]

13. The rules are a little confusing

it sounds like they could hold the hearing but that they wouldn't be able to vote or doing anything about the nomination?


II. QUORUMS

1. Ten Members shall constitute a quorum of the Committee when reporting a bill or nomination; provided that proxies shall not be counted in making a quorum.

2. For the purpose of taking sworn testimony, a quorum of the Committee and each Subcommittee thereof, now or hereafter appointed, shall consist of one Senator.

http://judiciary.senate.gov/committee_rules.cfm

[tx_dem41]

14. Not that confusing...since the reporting of the nomination won't take..

place tomorrow, only case 2 holds forth for tomorrow.

[ruthg]

2. I want to be Randi when I grow up....

whoops. I already grew up. never mind.

Ruth, listening.

[obnoxiousdrunk]

3. The firewall won't

let me do it. I'm so pissed.