Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has this ever happened before?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 07:54 PM
Original message
Has this ever happened before?
Has a senator and representatvie ever contested a states electoral votes before or is this the first time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SicTransit Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. 1876. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you SicTransit.
Similar circumstances?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amy6627 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here is more info on it...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. 1969 looks like the last time - a NC faithless elector
http://www.knoxstudio.com/shns/story.cfm?pk=ELECT-CONGRESS-11-21-00&cat=WW


"The last time this happened was 1969, when Sen. Edmund Muskie, D-Maine, Humphrey's running mate, objected that a North Carolina Democratic elector had decided to vote for George Wallace. Both the House and Senate deliberated and decided North Carolina's laws did not bind the elector to vote the winning ticket, so the elector's vote stood."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good catch.
I'd heard that, but forgotten it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes
From what I understand, that was a "back door deal" too.

In this day and age, the "back door" (IF the contested Ohio electors reach the M$M} will be seen as strictly "political." That means that hopefully more and more people will be able to see that the "people" are no longer viable in electing their representatives NOR the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC