Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't they have to have an exact count before electors can be elected?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 09:14 PM
Original message
Don't they have to have an exact count before electors can be elected?
I mean, doesn't there have to be an official count of all the votes, and a resolution of all the discrepancies before a state can announce its electors are elected? They can't just "guesstimate" can they? There has to be an actual number of votes, right? If Ohio can't produce an exact count, due to any number of reasons, wouldn't that nullify it's election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. not really, there are millions of "spoiled" votes every election
google Greg Palast and "spoiled vote" for a good article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, many votes are thrown out, I know
But, ultimately, they have to come up with an exact number of valid votes. And if they can't do that, wouldn't that nullify the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. they'll come up with a number, never fear. It's called CYA n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And won't we have access to how they arrived at that number?
Won't we know all the e-votes, and be able to compare them to the registrations of the voters? Won't they have to break down the number into counties and type of ballot? And wouldn't this give us what we need to talk about fraud?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, they can guesstimate, especially now that one Party
has capitulated.

Why waste the taxpayers money on pointless recounts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But if we ask, don't they have to provide proof of the votes?
They can't just call the election until all valid votes are actually counted. And they have to have a legal way of determining valid votes. And we have a right to know what votes they counted and why, and how they handled the discrepencies. The electors aren't legal until the election is legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Wrong. The Constitution says...
that each state legislature shall certify a board of electors. It does not say how. In theory, Party Z could win 90% of the vote, and the legislature could still sent electors for Patry A to the college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatsFan2004 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. They have legal procedures to follow with the counts.
Provisional ballots are only counted if they would change the winner. Otherwise, by law in many states they are completely ignored. In Ohio, a governor's race was decided by the provisional ballots. Apparently, there may not be enough provisional ballots to make a difference in Ohio and other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. There doesn't even have to be a vote
before a state announces its electors.

The state legislature ca just name them and skip the whole people's vote election day thing.

South Carolina didn't have a vote for president for 70 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Didn't Katherine Harris "certify" the Florida vote in 2000?
The official number is what's on the piece of paper signed by an important person.

Even in the "old days", it was an estimate--yes, a "guesstimate". With electronic voting--we must have even more faith. Sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. No. Each state gets to make it's own rules. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC