Conyers said they got five other senators besides Boxer!

[imenja]

Who are they?

[sabra]

1. I noticed that too?

[cyberpj]

2. they spoke, but they didn't object to Ohio verification -

[ElsewheresDaughter]

3. i think i read that Harkin was one

[noamnety]

4. Did they talk but not vote?

Sign and talk but not vote? I was gone for a lot of this.

[Snivi Yllom]

5. Conyers was incorrect, the Senate vote was 74-1, only Boxer

[imenja]

9. but they must have promised him support

I wonder who he meant, and what happened? Let's hope the press gets on to this.

[mattclearing]

6. This was mentioned at the rally too.

Supposedly they were to be Obama, Dodd, Reid, and I've heard varying reports on Feingold and Clinton, but don't remember them being called out from the podium.

[imenja]

10. Reid was in the House

sitting next to Boxer. I didn't see the others. Viva the Boxer Rebellion!

[kitkat65]

7. I could have sworn I heard an aye from Leahy

[48pan]

8. Conyers Just Said...

He said the none of the Reps who objected to the certification of the Ohio electors had said that there was fraud or that Bush didn't win.

Huh? Wasn't that the whole point?

[DireStrike]

11. No it was not!

The point is that there are countless questions that need to be answered that undermine confidence in the election process.

As to whether Bush won, I hope you weren't thinking this could get him overthrown.

As to the fraud, I believe they presented evidence of fraud which they were reluctant to call proof of fraud.

[imenja]

12. ?

Reps meaning representatives or Republicans? I'm not following you here.

[noamnety]

13. reps meaning representatives

It's a matter of framing. It's about having an election we can have confidence in, not about overturning the election.