PennyMan
(231 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 06:24 PM
Original message |
West 'better off' with bin Laden at large said AB "Buzzy" Krongard, |
noamnety
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. did the same logic apply to Saddam? |
|
They are't commenting on that, I see.
|
Dancing_Dave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Considering how much money Buzzy made off of 9/11 |
|
It's obviously better for him to keep the scam going! :puke:
|
BlackCoffeeSound
(50 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |
Wright Patman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
have heard that Alex Jones exposed the money he made off 9-11 through the futures market or he wouldn't make such careless remarks.
|
anamandujano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. "Let's say you and I want to blow up Trafalgar Square. |
|
So we go to bin Laden. And he'll say, 'Well, here's some money and some passports and if you need weapons, see this guy'."
Pretty simple formula. Krongard should know from venture capitalists.
The part of the last sentence that is really disgusting--
"to acknowledge publicly that his capture might prove counter-productive"
to acknowledge--basically saying that this is the correct view and he is just admitting it
It's not that Bush can't catch him, he doesn't want to, and this is the spin that will let him off the hook. All in the family.
|
Catamount
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |