Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sharpton: Bush took advantage of gay marriage debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:00 AM
Original message
Sharpton: Bush took advantage of gay marriage debate
ATLANTA - President Bush exploited religious feelings against gay marriage in his re-election campaign, former presidential candidate Al Sharpton said.

Speaking on Sunday at Atlanta's Butler Street Christian Methodist Episcopal, Sharpton said Bush used the gay marriage debate to draw attention away from the Iraq war and ignored domestic problems.

"I think George Bush manipulated a lot of religious feelings about marriage when the president has little or nothing to do with marriage," Sharpton said.

The 2004 election was not the place for a moral debate, the New York Democrat said.

more: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/news/local/10607670.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Philly Buster Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Actually I thought Bush pretty much ignored it
Instead he let his operatives do his dirty work for him. But I can't listen to him when he's on the tube so I may have missed something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. I watched a Chris Rock special yesterday
a recent one...and he said something to the extent "It's amazing how clear of a position Bush took on gay marriage. If you ask him about Iraq and economy, it's all about 'we're making progress...democracy is on the way...indicators are up..blah, blah, blah'...mention gays getting married, and it's 'F&^k the fags!'.

It's funny (and sad) cause it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He is certainly able to stay on message
when he wants to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NationalEnquirer Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. No Duh!
This is like "No Shit Sherlock!"

It motivated his base, I dont care what any analyst says.
I thought the whole "national debate" was a con job by the Republicans, and they got away with it.

Ultimately it doesn't matter, gay marriages WILL HAPPEN.
Sooner or later, it is unstoppable in my opinion.
As the old homophobes die off, the younger more tolerant folks will allow this to happen.

I didn't know ANY republicans who were really against it, but then all the ones I know are like under 30.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. I grant you that
all this is so. But can we realistically expect the Republicans only to campaign on issues where we represent the majority view and refrain from those that, they think anyway, they represent the majority view.

This seems to me to be wishful thinking that they would not raise their issues, same as we do. We just need to learn how to combat it better. Whining after the fact doesn't change anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree, They had to have a reason for the extra votes for *
Why would these states, have on a ballot to ban something that was not law in their repective states? It was a non-exisitant issue. Correct me if I am wrong, But which one of these states had a standing law that Gays could marry?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC