BrightKnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-06-04 10:09 PM
Original message |
Scientific American Could Publish a Detailed Statistical Analysis. |
|
The proof could be as complex and esoteric as necessary. As long as the results are scientific and accurate no one will care. Can you imagine how many magazines they would sell with the lead story like “Statistical Analysis proves that the 2004 Election was Hacked." This could be really embarrassing to the neo-cons. The large papers would be required to weigh in on this and they would not be able to white wash the issue away.
They might also publish a story on the election technology used and its vulnerability to fraud. I am sure that the IT security experts that reviewed the Diebold code would have some fascinating things to say about this.
This might get the momentum going in the right direction without dragging the party through the mud. Kerry will look really noble and Bush will look very bad.
Any respected scientific journal could be substituted.
|
rwheeler31
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-06-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Great idea, I still say talk to slot tecks at casinos to show |
|
how easy this is is and make it clear.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |