Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

41% of Nov. 2 provisional ballots axed in Lucas County.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
mdb Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:47 PM
Original message
41% of Nov. 2 provisional ballots axed in Lucas County.
Ralph and Barbara George are lifelong Democrats who first registered to vote for John F. Kennedy in 1960 and have lived in the same East Toledo house for 44 years.

More than 28,000 voters were purged from the Lucas County rolls last summer...


http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050109/NEWS09/501090334/-1/NEWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Lucas Co. a democratic?
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 08:05 PM by Goldeneye
I find it interesting that they had the option of purging the rolls of "inactive" voters before or after the election, and in the true republican spirit of elections, they chose to eliminate potential voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintCooper2003 Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Democratic? Yeah, you could say that...
Lucas County
Kerry 132,715
Bush 87,160


For comparison
2000
Lucas County
Gore 108,344
Bush 73,342
Nader 4,227

Kerry's number goes up 22% over Gore's and Bush's goes up 19% over his previous figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. 2/3 of provisionals in Florida rejected; and most due to official malfeasa
Most provisionals in Ohio and Florida that were rejected were from voters who were either eligible voters or would have been other than active malfeasance on the part of poll workers or officials. Most of those whose votes were rejected should sign affidavits and pursue ethics charges or indictments against the officials responsible for their not being able to or allowed to vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC