TruthIsAll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 02:43 AM
Original message |
BASED ON EXIT POLLS, THE PROBABILITY KERRY WOULD LOSE OH AND FL = 0.15% |
|
That's less than 1/6 of one percent!
To put it another way, the chances are 1 out of 667 that Bush would win BOTH states.
Assuming a 2% MoE for the exit polls (they are much more accurate than standard polls), the probabilities are:
Ohio Exit Poll: Kerry 52 - Bush 48 Prob (Kerry wins OH)= 97.7%
Florida Exit Poll: Kerry 51 - Bush 48 Prob (Kerry wins FL)= 93.5%
Then Prob (Kerry loses FL and OH) =0.15% = (1-.977)*(1-.935)
Prob(Kerry wins OH or FL or Both)= 99.85% = 1 -.15%
How did I calculate the probs? Simple. Feed the data into the Excel Normal Distribution function:
Since the MoE = .02, the Standard Deviation is .02/1.96 = .01
Prob (Kerry wins OH)= NORMDIST(0.52,0.5,0.01,TRUE) = 97.7%
Prob (Kerry wins FL)= NORMDIST(51/99,0.5,0.01,TRUE) = 93.5%
|
JohnnyCougar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 02:50 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I wonder what would happen if |
|
we did t-test for independent groups based on the differences between your two groups of states. Or an ANOVA. I wish I could get SPSS on my computer.
|
TruthIsAll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. Forget SPSS. You have all the functions you need in Excel |
shelley806
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 02:51 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It's so good to see probabilities worked out in black and white.... |
|
I know it makes sense, but I can't stand the media downplaying the significance of exit polls. Do they really take us for such fools?
|
LisaL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yes. And most people seem to accept it without questions. |
George_S
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 02:56 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Maybe you have it there already.... |
|
but what are the odds that Bush would win both? I mean, Bush has a .15 chance, I guess, but that would be 1 out of what chance?
|
TruthIsAll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Its right there: 1 out of 667 |
TruthIsAll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
TruthIsAll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
disregard the exit polls..
That should be our fucking clue right there.
rove or cheney..whatever.
|
peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. He said to disregard? But he also said voters lied to exit poll takers. |
|
So according to the lying excuse - about 50% of Repubs lied by saying they had voted for Kerry when they actually voted for Bush. Wouldn't that mean that they would have had to orchestrate a request to Repubs to ask them to do that by phone or the pulpit or e-mail or billboards?
If they didn't orchestrated that, would it mean that there is a tradition of lying to pollsters?
If you were inclined to respond to a poll, would you lie?
Or did I misunderstand the figures?
|
Thomas Jefferson
(113 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-07-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |