Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just a reminder: It's not 'voter fraud', it's ELECTION FRAUD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:20 PM
Original message
Just a reminder: It's not 'voter fraud', it's ELECTION FRAUD
hate to beat a dead horse and i'm sure some people are tired of hearing me say it, but i still see it used way to often. i think this is what they call 'framing', and it needs to be framed correctly or people who are new to the issue are going to get the wrong idea. It's not the voters who committed the fraud, it's the voting machines/tabulators, voter suppression, etc - all as one, election fraud. PLEASE, try to use ELECTION FRAUD more frequently!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. theez guys call it Electoral Fraud
this is a good "encyclopedia" definition of it:

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Electoral_fraud

Electoral fraud is possibly the single most effective propaganda technique ever created. It simultaneously fools the majority of voters into thinking they are a minority, the minority to be empowered is emboldened by thinking they are a majority, moves the whole weight of the state, military, judiciary and bureaucracy behind the fraudulent pretender, and in general brings down the wrath of the public on those who contest the results beyond some minimal and mandated process.

The Roman Empire as consolidated under Emperor Augustus Caesar used the technique, with the Emperor's friends and family running for the electoral offices that had been established under the old Roman Republic. As with today's electoral frauds, a great pomp and circumstance would accompany the elections to posts of Consul, Tribune, etc.. However, in fact, these were part of a strict military dictatorship defended by the Praetorian Guard - it was, especially under later Emperors, dangerous to run against his friends, and even more dangerous to publicly criticize those Caesar favoured to hold offices.

The Communist bloc made great effort to claim democratic legitimacy and likewise held elections for all important offices that were associated with the state (as opposed to the Communist Party which usually appointed its own leaers, the real power base). Josef Stalin is popularly attributed to have said "The people who vote decide nothing; the people who count the votes decide everything."

However, even in one-candidate races, there is often a valid reason to hold an election: to test the degree to which the public or party will take action to support the designated official. This is the purpose of ratification votes in the Communist Party of China, for instance.

more:

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Electoral_fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ok
Edited on Thu Jan-13-05 11:28 PM by Faye
e·lec·tor·al Audio pronunciation of "Electoral" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (-lktr-l)
adj.

1. Of, relating to, or composed of electors.
2. Of or relating to election.


as long as it is used in context relating to definition #2, i dont' see anything wrong with using 'electoral fraud'. as long as it focuses on the root word 'elect', and not the root word 'vote', i think it gets the correct message across as well as 'election'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. let's also be clear on the definition of fraud
Edited on Thu Jan-13-05 11:39 PM by Faye
fraud Audio pronunciation of "fraud" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (frôd)
n.

1. A deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain.
2. A piece of trickery; a trick.

voter suppression and failure to provide adequate number of machines are by defnition, FRAUD. don't let anyone fool you.




I will also further explain why the words 'vote' or 'voter' must not be involved with spreading the word of this issue. Yes, there were some fraudulent votes. Fraudulent tabulation of votes. Ghost votes. More votes than voters. Votes for Kerry coming up for Bush.

But the blame does not lie with the VOTERS, it lies with with the election officials and the companies that provide the voting machines. THE FOCUS MUST BE ON THE HANDLING OF THE ELECTION, NOT THE VOTERS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Electoral fraud, yep!
Courtesy of the "rethug" party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. election fraud? -- Rove & co. pulled it off briantly, sad to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. YES! I was in a bookstore tonight and the only book on the subject had...
the subtitle "Voter Fraud in America". GEESH! The poor voters are screwed out of their vote and now according to that title THEY are the ones apparently doing the fraud.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. that's why it needs to stop.
i swear someone said this before, and i believe it is true - 'voter fraud' is the "Rovian" term. lol

but it is! it is misleading and distorts what the issue really is!

Well, it starts with one person and spreads from there. Spread the word, the word is ELECTION FRAUD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick until 10 more people see this, and then GRIND IT INTO YOUR HEAD
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 12:55 AM by Faye
and pass it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeHoldTheseTruths Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think the word that applies with "voter" is suppression.
Voter suppression.

Voter suppression and election fraud.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Voter fraud is a perfectly correct term, but like all phrases...
depends upon the context. Voter fraud is when an individual voter does something fraudulent such as vote twice or fill out someone else's absentee ballot. So it can be used correctly, but not with respect to manipulating results on a broader scale. That would be done by voter suppression, vote manipulation, etc. and in that case would be called election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. yes but
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 12:49 PM by Faye
the focus is ALL OF IT, meaning election fraud. whether it's fraud by the voters or fraud by the election officials or machine manufacturers.

My main point is, too many people are using 'voter fraud' as the general word and it is too misleading and takes away from the message being conveyed.

Sorry if anyone disagrees, but using 'voter fraud' is BAD BAD BAD BAD BAD.


(and it drives Faye up a wall)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I agree with you, but the point remains...
there have been conversations about voter fraud that were specifically about voter fraud. To call what the grieving widower did in Washington election fraud misses the point of that story. I think it's more important to be accurate than get rid of a perfectly good phrase. I think we probably agree more than disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. no, i understand what you are saying
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 01:16 PM by Faye
if you are talking about a voter that voted twice then by all means, use voter fraud!!!!!!

SORRY FOR CAPS, BUT MY POINT IS, when you are using in GENERAL, it is election fraud, all around fraud, not just fraud by the voters. For example, if you want to tell someone that there are invesitigations in Ohio into 'fraud', you might say it was 'vote' fraud.

if you were referring to some voter who voted twice or committed some other kind of fraud, then of course you would say, for that specific case, it was 'voter fraud'.

All of it together, and in spreading the word to others, we need to use ELECTION FRAUD, so it covers all of the fraudulent actions and conveys the message that the ELECTION WAS FRAUDULENT.

i will explain it until you understand. i am patient. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I do understand. I swear I do. LOL!
You're preaching to the choir. I do use the phrase election fraud. But when someone asks if voter fraud is not correct it should be pointed out that at times it can be...but it depends upon what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. ok good
just as long as you use election fraud when spreading the general word!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Depends upon what you are talking about.
I referred to individuals caught voting twice, once by absentee ballot or early voting and then again at their polling place. Another story was about a guy who submitted an absentee ballot that arrived after his wife passed away. In those cases it would be voter fraud.

Overall though I agree. I'm trying to be extremely precise with my language. Voter suppression, vote manipulation, election fraud, etc. Definitely worth the reminder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. A lot of it was vote machine fraud- especially touchscreens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kicking for Faye's noble and relentless crusade.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. I've been biting my tongue too
Seen lots of the inaccurate version lately, and have held back, not wanting to make too much trouble. But yeah, I totally agree and support your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. do not hesitate to correct people
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 01:04 PM by Faye
i've so far only found one person out of hundreds who seemed offended. i pound this concept so hard i got Fintan Dunne of BreadForNews.com to voluntarily change it all over his site, and to stop using it in his articles.

i explained why it is so important to say 'election fraud' in the two posts i made with the dictionary definitions...it's kind of a semantics/framing thing i guess you could say. but don't hesitate to correct people and if they ask why, explain to them what i said in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Which is a crime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pendulum Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. needs a kick,
I love your posts, Faye! :hi:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. thank you
and welcome to DU :hi: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC