mojogeorgo
(321 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 11:55 AM
Original message |
Ohio election suit withdrawn, but stay tuned |
|
Commentary from Cliff Arnebeck and the citizens who filed the complaint on the meaning of the suit, and how this thing isn't over yet. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/1/14/113850/623
|
RoeBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
1. The pounding of heads against |
|
the wall isn't over yet? Yippee
|
teddyk23
(92 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
They are obviously hinting at a federal civil rights lawsuit.
Remember something called Paula Jones vs. William Jefferson Clinton? That too was filed as a federal civil rights lawsuit. It resulted in a sitting President being deposed in an open ended way, which led to questions about Lewinsky, and you know the rest.
The point is a plaintiff in a federal civil rights lawsuit, who meets minimal pleading requirements (less than Ohio supreme court required) can likely get to discovery, depositions, and hopefully the truth.
|
rfranklin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. The Chimp will testify sitting on cheney's lap... |
|
with Rove's fist up his rear end to move the lips.
|
RoeBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. It's never going to get that far |
|
comapring it to the Jones Clinton fiasco is silly
|
teddyk23
(92 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. best you would have said that |
|
about Paula Jones lawsuit back in 1994. All of us would have said that....
My point is not that it WILL go that far, but that it COULD and, from my point of view, it should not be completely dismissed by you out of hand.
Agree to disagree, I guess.
|
ladjf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Amazing. My company screening software removed my |
|
comment about pounding heads against the wall.
What I said was that thousands of sp.rm cells pound their heads against the egg walls before one if finally able to penetrate successfully. The funny thing is that the previous sp.rm cells had weakened the egg walls by certain chemical processes. We each owe our lives to the cells that arrived earlier and allowed the one cell to get through.
I presume that the word sp.rm, fully spelled out was regarded as some sort of p.rn. We are truly living in some very scr.wed up times when it's considered vulgar to discuss one of the original cells of life.
|
skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. You know that means... |
|
Anyone can call you bad names behind your back, right? :-)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message |