The New Mexico paradigm

[RaulVB]

OK, this is sticky but may become true very soon.

Richardson understands that fraud took place in New Mexico. It would be a scandal exploited and distorted by the "rethugs" but good because will illustrate BEYOND DOUBT that the "election" was invalid.

Does he knows that his future political career would be over?

You think Richardson will sacrifice it for the "common good"?

[Warpy]

1. Richardson?

Think of a snowball in hell.

[RaulVB]

3. Well, sure...

That's why he is stonewalling the process of asking for a fair count.

But I want to clarify Richardson's "character" for the crowd who doesn't know him.

[Botany]

2. Richardson is a good man.

Richardson under Clinton held meetings w/ the N. Koreans and let them
harangue for a couple of days and then finally asking them, "O.K. how much rice
do you need?" And then they stopped their nuclear weapons programs for another
year. Bush stopped the meetings and what do we have now?


:kick:


LLBR

[Warpy]

4. he was also instrumental in railroading Wen Ho Lee

He's a DINO at best.

[rdmccur]

5. Plausible.

So how could he be taken off the hook (and still get the recount)?
That would be the strategy to adopt.

[RaulVB]

6. Well, we know already what type of "strategists" we have...

Richardson knows it too!

[rdmccur]

11. I was thinking in terms of the people doing the litigation, etc.

Maybe there is a legal way to get Richardson off the hook
and have a partial recount.

[RaulVB]

12. Oh, yes, it would be possible, legally (n/t)

[KittyWampus]

7. Was Going To Post About NM Too. It's The Soft White Underbelly

of Election Fraud.

Richardson's behavior is indicative of something.

[RaulVB]

8. What's your opinion on this? (n/t)

[Al-CIAda]

9. Richardson 'in on' the rigging scheme?

Certainly possible.
Of course I am of the opinion that the party is infiltrated with Dem turncoats.
Isn't he also DLC?

[RaulVB]

10. Yes, a "Clintonite" (n/t)

[berniew1]

13. I think he thinks documenting fraud there would tarnish his image

And I think he has higher ambitions. He doesn't appear to be doing what I think is best for America, which is exposing the widespread fraud and minority suppression and dirty tricks that occurred there.
Though he wasn't involved in them likely, he seems to think he should have been able to prevent them. I think the Sec. of State (a Dem) there is very bad.