RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 11:26 PM
Original message |
"Rethug" fairy tales about the "election" 2004 |
|
"*" got "more votes" among females and independents.
"*" got "more votes" in democratic strongholds!
THOSE ARE THE ELEMENTS THAT WOULD EXPLAIN THE 3 MILLION EDGE OVER KERRY.
- Reality :
OREGON 2000 : Gore beats "*" by just 7.000 votes. OREGON 2004 : Kerry beats "*" by 67.000 votes!
MINNESOTA 2000 : Gore beats "*" by 58.000 votes. MINNESOTA 2004 : Kerry beats "*" by 99.000 votes!
So on, so forth.
Where "*" has claimed to have "gained" votes is in these places:
New York San Francisco New Jersey Pennsylvania
If you want to believe that BS, be my guest but then you will not want to know about North Dakota.
Here we have the ULTIMATE SMOKING GUN THAT TELLS YOU ABOUT EXIT POLLS AND THE VALIDITY OF VOTING PATTERNS.
NORTH DAKOTA 2000 :
"*" : 174,852 (60.7%) GORE : 95,284 (33.1%)
NORTH DAKOTA 2004 :
"*"(Incumbent) : 195,998 (63%) KERRY : 110,662 (36%)
Yep, you got that right, no shift and Kerry actually gains ground respect to Gore in a state where HE DID NOT CAMPAIGN.
|
signmike
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It doesn't matter who gets the votes, |
|
all that matters is who counts them.
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's all bullsh*t, but if the volunteer get out the vote campaigners.. |
|
...say actually did get 35,600 more people to vote in ND, then perhaps 15,000 did come out for Kerry because they knew the Bush vote would be strong which it was to the tune of 20,000 additional votes for the Bush side. There was no question that voters were motivated to vote, which means that in the mid-terms we need to get even more democrats out and take both house back with democratic majorities.
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Who won in November 2nd? (n/t) |
Wabbajack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
OREGON 2000 : Gore beats "*" by just 7.000 votes. OREGON 2004 : Kerry beats "*" by 67.000 votes!
MINNESOTA 2000 : Gore beats "*" by 58.000 votes. MINNESOTA 2004 : Kerry beats "*" by 99.000 votes!
That's cause Kerry got most of the nader votes
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-14-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 11:59 PM by RaulVB
If the WHITE HOUSE CLAIMS THAT NADER VOTES WENT FOR "*"?
Didn't you listen to your "leader" lately?
|
Wabbajack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-15-05 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. WHITE HOUSE CLAIMS THAT NADER VOTES WENT FOR "*" |
|
Um I don't think they claimed that. If they did then that's laugable.
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-15-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. They did and is laughable (n/t) |
texpatriot2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-15-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Kick it for your title, Rethug Fairy Tales, I don't buy them n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |