|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
ccarter84 (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 02:56 PM Original message |
has this graphic been proven wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patchuli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. You aren't splitting hairs...that's true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 04:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Prove that and you'll be a hero n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patchuli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-05 07:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. KKKarl Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flintdem (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Controlled for county patterns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccarter84 (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 03:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. afraid I don't even know where this chart came from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rdmccur (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 07:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I saw that graphic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Well obviously the New Hampshire exits were seriously flawed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theresistance (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. This has been well established... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoMama49 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. I just saw it again when I tuned into the Guy James Show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-05 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-05 08:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Ohio votes were mostly cast by punch, but counted by opti-scan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-05 09:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I thought optiscan was like a standardized test -- fill in the bubbles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-05 11:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-17-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Not 100% accurate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-17-05 11:10 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I'm not sure how that answers the question. Ohio's votes were optically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-17-05 09:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-18-05 05:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Omission is not indicative of error |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-19-05 12:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Omission has nothing to do with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-19-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. It is a graphic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-20-05 10:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. You may not have been around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-21-05 08:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Up to this point.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-19-05 12:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Opscan and e-votes were counted using the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-19-05 12:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Probably Triad. (I hope that helps your search) N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-18-05 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
17. Here is a link for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emcguffie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-19-05 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
23. I've been wondering where that was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC