Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So you think Diane Feinstein has to go?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
darkworkz Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:50 PM
Original message
So you think Diane Feinstein has to go?
Who could she be replaced with that will clearly stand with Boxer if not go farther than her?

Maxine Waters, of course. Rep. Waters would be an excellent replacement for Feinstein.

Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Question: Is the phrase "Chinaman's chance" is considered bigotted, right?
Well, try to find the acceptable alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ice cube in hell?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Whatever, they are all accurate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. How could any Dem(or Repub for that matter) vote to confirm?
especially after the comments Condi made today. She showed her true colors on the tsunami, torture, the reason for war, unfair preference for some countries, her unwillingness to question the administratin, ect. ect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have almost convinced myself
that I should run against DiFi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corbett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Go For It!
She's a disgrace. A real Democrat needs to run for that seat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd kill for Waters, but I think we really need to import Al Gore
I'd LOVE him to be our Senator. He and Boxer would make a really great team.

Feinstein can bite my shiny metal ass

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. no serious democrat will challenge Feinstein
She is the states most popular democratic politician. She always wins by big margins. She was the democrat people were pleading with to go up against Arnold for Governor in the recall election last year. I'm not a Feinstein fan, but those are the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. She was
Boxer is much bigger than her now, IMO.

And I'd love DiFi to run against Arnold in 06. That way she's out of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKJackson Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Feinstein is a nobody now
Feinstein is a nobody now, and anyone who refuses to stand up to the Bushies might as well switch parties and be done with it. There comes a time when you have to make your choice and choose which side of the fence you want to be on. Are you going to stand for democracy or treasonous fascism? If Feinstein doesn't choose democracy then she is as good as a goose stepper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. Feinstein is much more popular in California than Boxer
with the general population. The liberals & progressives prefer Boxer. The centerists and moderates, a larger number of the population, prefers Feinstein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great idea!....Oops, one problem...
She has no chance in hell of being elected to a statewide office. Result, one more seat lost to the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Watters on the ballot, will get my vote over Feinstein.
I will actively campain against Feinstein for not seeing what's in plain sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why? Is she sitting, grimacing with her legs crossed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkworkz Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. question: Which US Senator is the international press looking at
Right now? A: Feinstein or B: Boxer?

The answer to that question will tell you who's got the power and who's weak, right now in Cali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Problem is that Waters couldn't beat Feinstein in a primary
Feinstein is the most popular Democrat in California. Doesn't anyone remember all the pressure that was on her to enter the recall election two years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. U have 2 make your voice heard @ the STATE
Democtratic party level and we should have started 3 years ago. The State Dem convention is in April and as disgusted w/ DF as I am, I know there is not someone we can get out 2 run successfully against her and whoever the rethugs put up. There isn't time. The primary is a year away. At the state level we need 2 B concentrating on getting rid of steroid boy and his governing by initiative ploy or we R going 2 lose this state 2 the rethugs. We need to shore up Sacramento first! Especially since it was stolen thru that phoney chicken-sh*t recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ya think Dianne Feinstein is a bit conflicted???
-snip-

Insiders told the Nelson Report that Zoellick decided to take the position on the assumption that he would be the logical choice for secretary of state if Rice left to return to academic life or run for the Senate next year against the Democratic incumbent, Dianne Feinstein, or if a Republican candidate wins the 2008 presidential election.

-more-

<http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=26937>

Of course, there's DiFi's hubby's $650MM contract in Afghanistan.

<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/27/BA284459.DTL>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistwell Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. No Way
She is one of the most popular politicians on our team. We might disagree with her sometimes..even often. But she is way better than running someone who will lose against a Republican. And that is what would happen if we ran a Maxine Waters.

Have you forgotten who our governor is? Have you forgotten that this is the state that elected Reagan, and Wilson? That recalled Davis? Have you forgotten that this is the state that passed Prop 187?

Yeah...please lets not eat our own. Diane might not be the best, but she IS charismatic, and does pull in voters from both political parties. It's much easier to pressure her to swing left than to replace her with someone who can both win an election and do more of the things we like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkworkz Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Haven't forgotten a thing.
I'm asking a question in light of the days events.

If you're not asking questions then you're apart of the "get along gang."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistwell Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm part of the "let's win" gang!
Look, if all you do is vote 100% on principal, then fucking vote for the Greens. Me, I will vote for the best reasonable choice of the realistic options.

Now mind you, that does NOT mean voting based on someone's resume. It does me voting for someone with both a pulse and some charisma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkworkz Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I don't think we're voting right now.
I could be wrong, but I think what we're doing here at the moment is looking at ways to understand how we got here, what we do, and how to move forward. So when it comes time to vote again we're well informed and have a better idea of what needs to be done.

*shrug* Seems kinda obvious to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKJackson Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Principals and spine come first, winning is the result of both being there
"Look, if all you do is vote 100% on principal,"

Didn't we get in the position we are in by abandoning principals? Look at the Repugs, they abandoned principals just to win, is that what you want to emulate?

"The lesser of two evils, is still evil."

"Evil men win when good men do nothing."

Voters know how to recognize morals when they see them, we need morals and a "pulse," Boxer is rapidly developing both. Someone that doesn't show up to do her job doesn't have a pulse, or a chance. Remember how the pugs got over on Kerry? By Kerry supposedly being soft. We need rigid, bold leaders whose stances are based in reality.

Again, as I said to the other gentleman, I'm not attacking you. I just want to provide some ideas that you can jumble around in your mental process. I consider yours, so all that I ask is that you consider mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistwell Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. I am considering it
I really am. I just think you are seriously out of touch with public opinion concerning Boxer. She won this last election because essentially nobody ran against her. But she is NOT popular. She would get CRUSHED running for President. And I am not saying she shouldn't make a go of it...I'm just saying that her running would end just like Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Nope.
She will not get another dime or another vote from me.

"Called in sick" on 1/6/05.

Supports CondomSleaza.

That's enuff for me. We have to hold our own accountable, and Dianne just isn't showing up or speaking out on the critical issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. LOL! Condomsleaza...LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Which other Democrats could win a state-wide race for Senate --
-- even if he/she could unseat Feinstein in the primary?

Is George Clooney a California resident? The man has a lot of brainpower. He more or less eviscerated Bill O'Reilly last week on the tsunami telethon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is John Burton an option?
DiFi is corrupt. She (and the excuses for her) are what's wrong with the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bardgal Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. YES! Diane out / MAXINE IN!!!
Diane has become a Smirk Smoocher, and Repub-lite. I'm sick of her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. Waxman would be good, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. Warren Beatty..he's already had practice in Bulworth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. From what I heard/saw today, I'd say she's an "enabler".
She "advises" Rice? What is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC