question about the common wisdom of 9/11

[nmoliver]

Regarding 9/11, I have a question I haven't seen asked before.

The common wisdom is that Andrew Card whispered into Bush's ear, "The second tower has been hit. The country is under attack."

What I'd like to know is: How do we know what Card whispered to Bush? Did we hear this from Card? From Bush? Who else heard it?

- Nina

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

The following is a synopsis of the case against Dick Cheney who was named as the prime suspect in the crimes on 9/11 by Michael C. Ruppert in Crossing the Rubicon.

MEANS: Dick Cheney and the Secret Service
Cheney was Commander in Chief on 9/11 calling the shots via Secret Service.

...

Dick Cheney was the acting Commander in Chief on 9/11 and Secret Service was the supreme command.

MOTIVE: Peak Oil
The world is about to start running out of oil.

Half of the world's oil has been, or is about to be, exhausted.

...

Dick Cheney knew about Peak Oil at least as early as 1999. He knows the economic impact of oil depletion and the catastrophic effects that will result.

9/11 made possible what Dick Cheney called, "The war that won't end in our lifetimes." This is a war that is chasing the last remaining hydrocarbons across the globe. The "war on terror" is in reality an energy war and 9/11 was its pretext.

OPPORTUNITY: 9/11 War Games
Cheney was managing multiple war games and terror drills on 9/11 that paralyzed U.S. Air Force response.

In May of 2001 Dick Cheney was placed directly in charge of managing the "seamless integration" of all training exercises throughout the federal government and military agencies by presidential mandate.

...

Whoever was coordinating the Air Force war games was under the management and direction of Dick Cheney, who was also in charge of managing a terror drill being set up on the West Side of downtown New York on 9/11 titled Tripod 2. This exercise set up a command and control center on 9/11 that was configured exactly like the one lost that morning in WTC 7. It was the perfect command center to respond to the crisis, and it was under Dick Cheney's management before the hijackings occurred. How convenient.

Dick Cheney was one of the main government officials deciding that such extensive war games would take place on 9/11. This was when American intelligence had collected dozens of warnings from governments and intelligence agencies indicating that terrorists were planning to hijack civilian aircraft and crash them into American targets on the ground during the week of September 9th, 2001.

[sabra]

1. Good question!

Maybe repost @ http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=125

[Old and In the Way]

2. I believe he said "Two down, two to go"

But since his testimony was off the record and unrecorded, who knows? I'll bet he was asked about this or his slip, "I saw the 1st plane on TV hit the WTC and I thought, hat's one bad pilot."

For once, I believe him....when can we start the impeachment/treason trial?

[Wilms]

3. I've begun to wonder if Card said something like:

"It ain't one tower (like we had been told) but now a second one.Oh. And your instructions are to stay put until your told."

[DoYouEverWonder]

4. Card probably said

the WTC attack is done but we're still waiting on the planes to hit DC. Sit tight, it shouldn't take much longer.

[Shalom]

5. I Think this DOES belong in the Election Fraud forum....

Because the basis for the election fraud is the 9/11 fraud: it's very hard to explain one without the other. People who scoff at either scam accuse us of being "conspiracists".

Looking at 9/11, what is very telling is the condescending ("condaleeza condaliar") way the administration has tried to gloss over their failure to recognize that aircraft could be used as weapons. Since their story depends on hiding this obvious fact, the explanation for the truth of what happened must be based upon this fact.

The source you have provided stitches together so many loose threads into a coherent explanation that it is hard to refute.

Thanks for the reference !