Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

letter from badnarik camp... then a letter from someone else

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
redsoxliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:15 PM
Original message
letter from badnarik camp... then a letter from someone else
Edited on Mon Nov-08-04 12:48 PM by redsoxliberal

To all,

I picked the letter below because it was representative of many of your e-mails, and I wanted to send out an answer to all of your questions. There is still a lot of work to shutting down the campaign and of course getting all of our personal lives back on track and the campaign will try to keep up with the job of informing all of our supporters as much as is possible.

Thank you all for your support and your concerns about vote fraud and the results of the election. Unfortunately the situation is that unless you are with in 5% of your opponent with 100% of the vote counted you must pay the cost for the recount and frankly to count even the ballots in just OH, NM, and FL would cost more than the campaign spent nationwide on the election. It would take thousands of man hours, for all of the counting boards in each state. The only one who can contest the results is the Kerry campaign. They have the resources and are within the margin to ask for an official recount. My guess is that they will not challenge the count although they are within the legal time frame.

If it were possible I would certainly look into it, but under the system (that we are trying to change remember) that we have it is just not possible.

Thank you again.

Fred Collins

Campaign Manager

Badnarik/Campagna 2004
--------------------------------

The Kerry campaign won't fight and no one else can afford to.
:(

(edited to change title in light of later email)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. So a party can steal an election by fraud & nothing can be done about it?
Edited on Mon Nov-08-04 12:19 PM by gsc2749
BULLSHIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I know in 2000 some newspaper or something got the ballots in
Florida to count the votes????? Under freedom of information act?????
It was way after the election.
So, I presume there is a way to get the ballots to count them!
Even if it is after the election and will not change the outcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I believe it was a 'consortium' of many big newspapers.
It was a major undertaking and probably won't be done this time because there was no challenge to the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. There doesn't have to be a challenge to the results, I think.
If the results seem fishy, why wouldn't anybody look into it?
Maybe someone like George Soros can sponsor it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I didn't mean to imply that there HAD to be a challenge,
just that it was the 'follow up' to a huge story that developed due to Gore's challenge.

If Gore had conceded, the follow up counting wouldn't have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
springhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. WE have to expose it somehow.......
That's the only way now. At his inaugural there needs to be a protest with everyone holding you are a fraud signs. Whatever we can do, and however we can organize it. We need to get people to start thinking that something out of the ordinary happened here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. It ain't over until WE say it's over
And beyond the fraud thing, we can hound and harrass and ridicule and mock and fight and obstruct the bush administration and everything they try to do until it makes what they did to Clinton look like child's play. There are stories about bush that are going to come out, like cockroaches from the woodwork, because too much is at stake and you can't keep up a facade like that forever. Sooner or later, a false idol reveals it is made of clay.

Buck up, cowboy, we have not yet begun to fight! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. YeeHaw!
How can we screw things up for them today? *g*

------------------------------------------------------------
Help expose the election 2004 voter fraud today!
http://www.geocities.com/greenpartyvoter/electionreform.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. don't forget blackboxvoting.org they have demanded under
freedom of Info. lots of info. When they are ready to go to the press we will have more power and momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Right. We have other ways to get this done.
------------------------------------------------------------
Help expose the election 2004 voter fraud today!
http://www.geocities.com/greenpartyvoter/electionreform.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nofurylike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. that is about one campaign, no? if so, deceptive title there. ?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nofurylike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. "My guess is that they will not challenge the count"
so, we know NOTHING MORE from this article.

unkind you wrote that thread title.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynintenn Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Didn't the Miami Herald count the votes in 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynintenn Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sorry after the 2000 election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redsoxliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. ok... now it looks possible again!
"It IS possible for the Badnarik campaign to be a part of getting the recounts done -- Please don’t rule out MoveOnPAC and other 527’s as sources of funding for recounts. Throughout the campaign(s) all they have to do is send out an email asking for contributions and they get $100,000’s in hours.

By the way — those of us who believe that the vote was hacked are not in a tiny minority. I saw one graph yesterday that indicated that a Gallup Poll had shown that only 77% of the public believes that Bush was elected fair & square, 10% believe that he won on a “technicality” and 13% believe the election was stolen. That’s right almost 25% -- 1 in every 4 Americans believes that this new ‘presidency’ is illegitimate. (I have not checked the Gallup website to be certain of these facts – I just saw the graph posted at another site).

Please... Please... Please... The campaigns of the 3rd parties (Badnarik, Nader, Cobb) may be the only ones with legal standing to request the recounts in some states (Florida? New Mexico? New Hampshire?). I believe that the will of the people to take action NOW is building and that we the citizens will pay to have the recounts done.

Best wishes!"


This is an email I just got but I'm withholding the name since it seemed like someone outside the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. No, It's Not Over
The Badnarik campaign was not the best hope.

The goal should be to raise so many questions as quickly as possible that it becomes a national issue. The numerous counties in Ohio which had more votes than voters is a start. That suggests ballot box stuffing.

But in order to get media attention, the questions and presentation must be VETTED internally so that the legitimate arguments and evidence are the ones that get the biggest play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. Could we raise money so that they could re-count in just Ohio? $80,000
was the figure I heard. Surely some of the organizations we are members of would help us with this. MoveOn.org and others?

I don't think it's getting the money...it's the will. Would he do it if he had the money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FW_ Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's not over
until everyone quits and last I checked not everyone was giving in to Bush's so called mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC