Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Name the group

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:17 PM
Original message
Poll question: Poll: Name the group
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 07:34 PM by understandinglife
Quite a bit of discussion about the name of the group. Thought that we could try two things:

1. A poll with some suggested names, coupled with;

2. Anyone can post a comment with a suggested name and others can reply to that comment with a yes or no, thereby ensuring that if someone devises a really great name and its not in the poll list, that we only have to go through one iteration of this process.

Would be most efficient if everyone either voted for a name in the poll; or posted a name + "nt" in the subject line; or a "yes"/"no" + "nt" in the subject line in response to a name suggestion.

Whichever name gets the most votes in the next 24 hours can be SUGGESTED to the Administrators as the name supported by the majority. In other words, I'm happy to be here and am not remotely trying to tell either the DU administrators or anyone else what the name of this dynamic and wonderful group should be (i'll just cast my 1 vote, without comment).

Thank you.


BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION; 24/7

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I picked the third one, I think the words Fraud and Reform need to both
be in it. Once the fraud is exposed, we need to REFORM the system. There is no point of one without the other!

Thank you for posting this poll! I don't know if it will change their minds, but it is worth a shot!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Darn! I meant to vote for yours, it is perfect!
I voted for the wrong one! I like "Stop fraud" and "reform" to be in it. I also think 2004 should be used but I can't think how. The "indict" may scare people that think they have to understand law, away. I REALLY think the name fraud has to be in it for new people. If I were just now coming on one of those wonderful "be the media" posters, and started to google potential fraud in this last election, we have LOST valuable search words. "2004" is
gone, and now "fraud" is gone. Bad...
BUT as Faye said the name doesn't matter in the end...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. i didn't say that
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 08:06 PM by Faye
i think it does matter, a lot.

i'm just trying to control my temper :o i just said *I'm* going to try not to pay attention to the name.

IT NEEDS TO SAY FRAUD, PEOPLE NEED TO GET USED TO THE WORD.

i feel better now :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. You make me feel better too
:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. SORRY!
I didn't mean to mis represent you! I feel like it matters, but the work has to move forward. Anyway I am so new, I feel like I am in High School, trying not to piss off the wrong people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
63. can "expose" be in the name?
Because I think what we have to do is expose the fraud that has taken place, not just reform and prevent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I asked in ATA yesterday whether we could vote on this issue
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 07:33 PM by Der Blaue Engel
The answer I received was "Sorry, the name has already been changed."

While I would like to see the word "fraud" in the name as well, I think the point is unfortunately moot.

on edit: FWIW, I would prefer something more like "Election Fraud and Reform Discussion," but there is no "other" category, so I think any suggestions within responses will get lost within the overall vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
54. Election fraud and reform action forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I picked No 5
Investigation and indictment are necessary.

Thanks for doing this poll!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree. We will never see reform if we don't document the criminal...
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 07:44 PM by understandinglife
...acts, indict the criminals, and, thereby, educate our fellow citizens of the scale of the assault on our American franchise of democracy.

Once the scale of the assault is understood we can advocate as to gather the energy (large numbers of our fellow citizens) to demand legislative reform of our election system.

Peace.

BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION;24/7 (aka TBO;24/7)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
55. We can still do all that under election reform. We wouldn't need reform
if we didn't have fraud. Why do people think fraud isn't included in reform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. 'Election Justice and Reform'.... taken partly from
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 07:52 PM by troubleinwinter
Barbara Boxer's phrase.

I want investigation and prosecution of the fraud. But I think "Justice" works as well as "fraud". Lots of people seem to freak at the fraud word... we want them to join us anyway, and learn.

But leaving it completely out of the name does not help us draw those new people who are interested in FRAUD/JUSTICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. yes n/t
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 07:57 PM by suffragette
Demanding justice, honoring Boxer and working to reform.
Love that combo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beth in VT Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I agree - "fraud" sounds shrill,
"justice" says what we're for, not against, and encompasses fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Stop Election Fraud: Indict, Legislate, Advocate"
I add my vote to this option in lieu of my suggested name, rather than being a "third-party candidate" and diluting the vote. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Cool!!! Appreciate the cohesive spirit in your vote!
I raise my glass to you :toast:

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'll second that!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thanks!
:D

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Quite a bit of discussion about the name of the group."?
It's more like a handful of people who have a difficult time dealing with reality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Oh look it here another repuke referrence
How cute a keyboard jockey slandering a long time fellow DUer. I'm waiting on some feedback from the powers that be before I really tell how things are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. how long anyone has been here means nothing
i think everyone here should know that by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. nice
proudly showing how long one was contributing to DU is now a sin but repeated references to fellow DUers being repuke is not. You might do yourself a favor next time and not get in the middle of a conversation that had absolutely nothing to do with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. ok, so i'm now not allowed to post in this thread....
ok.

"How cute a keyboard jockey slandering a long time fellow DUer. I'm waiting on some feedback from the powers that be before I really tell how things are!".

nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. look for trouble somewhere else
are you lonely or something?:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. no
just bored :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. sorry
i shouldnt have gone that far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. To think
that I accused you of being a Repub is preposterous. I asked if you were joking, as you used the exact words that are used against us, saying that discussion of an issue indicated that we "have a difficult time dealing with reality".

It seemed like it must be a joke, right? Well, it did until you refered to me as a "keyboard jockey".

Looking forward to the time you can "really tell how things are!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Not only
did I not say that you (or any one else) were a "repuke" (a word I do not use) at any time, I certainly did not make "repeated references to fellow DUers being repuke".

If you think I did, hit 'alert'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Okay, now who just voted for my obsolete option 6?
Could it be someone who wanted to dilute the vote? LOL

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL indeed!! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I hereby declare that a vote for 6 is a vote for 5
(ducking)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. ROFLMAO!!! You're one brave soul!!! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantomvotes Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. This is good but
after the name is decided on, I believe a spin off forum with categorized folder subject matter should be created. Organization is the key or it will continue into speculative chatter.

IDEOLOGY:

Stop Election Fraud: Indict, Legislate, Advocate:

1) FRAUD: THE EVIDENCE and PROOF :

2) LAWS and INDICT: THE POWER ADVOCATES:

3) GROUP SOUNDING BOARD:


MY IDEA-------------> NEVER AGAIN my COUNTRY:
N- NO = resitance now to their cover ups ( past & present)= court proceedings wins loses
E- EVIDENCE/PROOF = evidence& documentation (past & present {key board armies}).
V- VERIFY IT it = new evidence to be investigated by investigative crew )
E- EVIDENCE/PROOF = evidence documentation acquired by foot work {on the ground foot army- {precinct, county, state, country, globe}
R- Resistance, Advocacy, Revolution (no more brainwashing denial propaganda- {ads, state spokesmen, wars frivolous law making changing crap}




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Very solid suggestions and I agree with the need for focus ....
...& organization of the ongoing endeavor.

It is essential that we keep the problem requiring legal, legislative and advocacy (election system literacy) in focus at all times -- that problem is Election Fraud.

"Reform" did not happen between 2000 and 2004 because the reasons justifying the reform were never brought to our fellow citizens in a compelling, justified manner.

Continued diligent analysis and investigation and legal activity against the perpetrators of any and every form of election fraud will provide the compelling justification and the necessary motivations for our fellow citizens to demand and support legislative reform, including a Constitutional ammendment on voter's rights.

Peace.


BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION; 24/7 (aka TBO;24/7)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken065 Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. I'll second that
since that's what I intended when I voted for 6. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
73. HAHAHAHAHA. I propose a rider to the group name change
legislation pending --- stating that at least 10% of the board participants remind the rest of us to keep our senses of humor in working order at all times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. Fully agree about full support for humor in this forum -- wish the KOEB ..
...would return and post here every weekday evening. Their spirit and fun added some warmth and laughter after another grinding day of investigating and stomping election fraud and finding ever more reasons to prosecute shrub and the neoconsters.

Peace.


BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION; 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #76
85. Be careful about what you wish for...
because you just might get it! :)

Thanks for the kind words, UL! And these are for you: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
74. I did it!
And I wish I could change my vote to #5, so count it that way if you'd like! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Will do!! ;-) (nt)






BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION; 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. Gee, I tried to vote for one, but it registered as a vote for five
I object to this electronic voting. We should mail our votes to the moderators instead. Paper trails!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Go for it!!! What street address and zip do we use for DU ?? (n/t)




BE THE BUSH OPPOSIITON;24/7 (aka TBO;24/7)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. Election fraud and reform action forum. Simple. If you feel strongly that
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 09:00 PM by Amaryllis
fraud needs to be in there. I in no way see that the current name excludes fraud,as dealing wtih and preventing fraud is the whole reason we need reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
32. Fraud, indict...
the investigation is far from over!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashuaadvocate Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. Why don't people see that "election reform" encompasses uncovering fraud?
I don't see the two as mutually exclusive. "Fraud" is a sub-category of the need for reform of the system. Calling this board "Election Reform Advocacy and Action" *IN NO WAY* chills people from posting fraud-related news...(!) In fact I can't even wrap my mind around the argument...

-- TNE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantomvotes Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. U go man !
My thoughts EXACTLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. pathetic isn't it?
there are literally a handful of people that have been continuing this by multi posting from similar thread to similar thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Talking about yourself, "pal"? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. There are some folks who get on Fraud threads and disrupt
the conversation by insisting there was not Fraud. It is annoying to those of us who want to have a conversation about it. In my experience they bring their freepy friends in and kill the thread. That is why some of us would like fraWd to be explicit in the title and purpose of the group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Because it is not just 'reform' that is required; and because explicit...
...statements of purpose typically precede action.

The actions include:

1. criminal investigations;

2. election fraud and disenfranchisement 'literacy' programs;

3. discussion of various legislative approaches to reform (including both the system by which people vote and an explicit Constitutional protection of their right to vote);

4. the actual process of effecting those reforms;

5. and the strategies for advocacy, including blunting attacks with all those who have much to fear and lose from both the legal actions and reforms we will make happen.

You have the cart miles in front of the horse. "Reform" will meet with a resounding "what & why" from the vast majority of our fellow citizens. And that will not change until we exhaustively document and force prosecution of those who disenfranchised voters in 2000, 2002, and 2004.

And we have all the failed efforts at 'reform' in the 107th and 108th US Congress as more than ample proof that until we educate our fellow citizens with an 'election fraud and disenfranchisement literacy program' we will get nowhere with 'reform.'

It is time to get absolutely explicit: STOP ELECTION FRAUD.

Investigate and prosecute the perpetrators; define and prepare all the required legislation; educate our fellow citizens; pass the legislation; and then we have reformed the system.

Reform is a consequence of having everyone focused on the fact that election fraud has criminally crippled our American franchise of democracy.

Thank you for all your outstanding contributions; way more than I'm likely ever to make and please know the above comments are made in that spirit.

Peace.

TBO;24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Is about MARKETING (because the truth "doesn't matter" anymore)
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 11:00 PM by RaulVB
I'm sure you are aware of WHO controls the message and the LANGUAGE used in politics today.

"Education" and "reform" will come AFTER the crime is exposed, not before the fraudulent system is broken down. Are the people behind the fraud going to "cooperate" with your/our reform "push"?

How? When? Why should they?

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #38
56. That's exactly what I keep saying. Wouldn't be need for reform if no fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
42. I say name it Timmy.
No, seriously, just call it Election Reform.

(Damn Progressives always want to complicate stuff. <LOL>)

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
47. Wait a minute!
We had only 24 hours to vote? How come we didn't have early voting for weeks in advance?

And suppose someone posted a "write-in" name for the group, followed by n/t, or answered Yes to one of these, and then went ahead and voted for one of the poll choices anyway? What mechanism is there for detecting overvotets?

And what about all the people who post here for which no vote is even recorded?

And for the Republicans in the group: What if someone clicks their mouse and (heaven forbid) drops dead just before their post actually gets to the web server? How can we tell if any dead people are voting?

And should there by instant runoffs in case one of the choices on the poll is acceptable to a voter, but he or she prefers to post a write-in? Why should they have to give up voting for a choice in the poll just to be able to cast their write-in vote?

And suppose someone has a slow Internet connection and gets online just as the 24-hours is about to end and the poll is closed before they have a chance to vote? Can they send in their vote provisionally via PM or Email? And if they do so, how do they know if it will actually be counted?

And is there a way to verify that the vote I cast that appears on the screen is actually the vote I intended to cast? Maybe someone else voted as I did at the same time and their vote counted but mine didn't. There's NO PAPER TRAIL!

And where does it say explicitly in the DU rules that we even HAVE a right to vote for Forum Names? Maybe we should leave that up to each of the forums instead? We can have forums that let their posters change their name everyday if they want to, and forums that NEVER vote for their names. I think the issue of Forums' Rights deserves SOME consideration.

And what about recounts? How much would it cost to have the moderators get together and recount all the votes, and how do we know they will do it fairly? After all, they might just want to spend some time with their families and friends after a stressful poll like this and come up with ANY old name so they can just go offline and relax?

Maybe we can just contract someone else to count our votes for us. Like FreeRepublic maybe? After all, they have no vested interest in the outcome, do they?

On second thought, I'm glad this name change election is over, even though concessions are of course non-binding. I don't think anyone has actually conceded yet, have they? But if they have, and we find some wrongdoing, what the heck -- just unconcede!

Personally, I like the new name, but we really should have had an exit poll. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. "I don't think anyone has actually conceded yet, have they?"
Sure they have...I conceded way up on post #6. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Lovely, brilliant, in fact!! Very much appreciated and....
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 12:11 AM by understandinglife
...I thought it exceptionally ironic that NO form of 'vote' had occurred in a group so intensively focused on the sanctity of 'voting'!!!

The 24 h 'balloting interval' is entirely arbitrary, but constraints are useful mechanism to achieve focus -- and, given many of the responses (and the voting pattern that is emerging) the constraint is working.

I expect that by the time we reach the 24h point on this thread we may well have 'fraud,' no matter what the 'frame' as a necessary component of the 'name.' We can then refine and vote for for a binary choice: name that includes 'fraud'; name that doesn't.

In any event, given the essence of what has bound and bonded so many of us since 2 Nov 2004 -- it would be rather weird, to say the least, to change the name of our little community at DU, WITHOUT A VOTE!!! Don't ya thunk?????? :think:

Peace.


BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION;24/7 (aka TBO;24/7)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #47
57. That was hysterically funny! Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
49. If this is a truly Democratic poll, it will require a 2/3rds majority...
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 12:12 AM by FreepFryer
...to change the admin-assigned name. See precedent up the wahoo.

{edit}Okay, maybe Representative Democratic. Let the games begin!{/edit}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. To cool!! ;-) See post #50. (nt)



TBO;24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
52. Election Forum. Because we want to talk: results, fraud, reform...
strategy, and everything else to do with making elections work and also winning them.

Election Forum.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. "Stop Stolen Elections Forum": Because we want to investigate, indict,..
...legislate, advocate and ensure that we are forever vigilant to our American franchise of Democracy, and the Constitution on which it is based, are not destroyed?

Please do check post # 50 about the irony of a forum so passionately committed to the sanctity of 'the vote' never voted on its name!!

I do believe We The People of the United States of America ...will Form A More Perfect Union.....because we believe in and support one another.

Peace.

TBO;24/7

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #52
58. Now that is brillliant in its simplicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emlev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
59. Election Justice--Advocacy and Action n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myschkin Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
60. what about Election Fraud INVESTIGATION

}(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenmutha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
61. "ELECTORAL JUSTICE & REFORM"
Taken, (gratefully), from John Conyers' endorsement letter to Howard Dean on 01-11-05.

Sorry to muddy the waters, but I think it is concise and speaks to what we are all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NationalEnquirer Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
62. Lets stick with something that CAN be agreed upon by all.
NO way to convince the majority about the fraud.
But MOST people DO want fair elections.
Thats the drum we should be beating on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
64. ELECTION FRAUD EXPOSE (NEED ACCENT THERE)
Something with "expose" in it. or ex-pos-ay, I don't know how to do the accent here.

I think we need to expose it, more than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riding this Donkey Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
65. CARToV
I know this is not the best acronym, we all know fraud occurred, but the question is what to do about it so it will never happen again.

We need to have not just election reform or another program, but a Constitutional Right to Vote. We can frame all of our issues under this umbrella and get people thinking about a larger picture.

I was watching Jesse Jackson Jr. yesterday and he put this perfectly.

We all have our own issues that we want brought to the fore front. But we don't work together to get the power we need to make differences for all of us. We don't work together, we get defined by one issue or another and our bigger message does not get out their. BTW, I am all for proving fraud and to keep investigating, but we can work two angles at once, right?

CARToV = Constitutional Amendement Right to Vote

I know this is not eloquent, but I hope people can understand what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
66. Will be sending the results, with a request to the DU admins...
....at ~ 415pm PST.

The request will be that they either accept the name that received the most votes or host a poll of the top two choices, with simple majority winning name being adopted.

As I mentioned in one of the comments, it is ironic that a forum, so passionately committed to uncovering election fraud and fostering election reform, did not vote on its name change. Well, we now have voted and hopefully the administrators will be supportive of the outcome.

In any event, this is a remarkable gathering of committed citizens and hopefully the spirit of "I believe" will continue to be nurtured and propagated by this forum.

Peace.

TBO;24/7



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Don't be disheartened if the name isn't changed. DU isn't a Democracy...
...but your sentiments are well-intentioned and well-appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. LOL
you are killing me today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Ah, to be appreciated in one's own lifetime! Somebody finally gets me! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. I'm not easily 'disheartened', as you may already have suspected ;-)
Thank you and here's one for your kind concern :toast:


BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION; 24/7

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
69. Election Fraud: Research and Activism "or" 2004 Election Fraud: Res. & Ac
If we use 2004 Election Fraud, it gives it the sense of urgency that "right here and now" urges. Besides, it's the one that has FINALLY gotten some people in BOTH the House AND the Senate interested in it! (But we can still go back to election 2000 for some of the research, because much of it obviously applies to our investigations).

There are finally many blogsters and articles and congress members getting involved, not to mention the court cases that are coming down the pike, so "2004 Election Fraud: Research & Activism" says a lot.

The other names proposed are just sort of, milk toast, and don't hit hard enough, nor urgently enough, for my taste. I think we need to tackle this issue head on.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
71. I picked number 5 because..........
It uses the word "Fraud" which is what we are dealing with. It also has sub-headings to spell out different types of actions in which to fight the fraud. To me calling our movement 'reform' just gives the repugs 4 years to nod and smile at us while they figure out new ways to cheat.

I've been out in the clubs the last few nights talking to people, and as far as I can tell - EVERYBODY KNOWS ** STOLE THIS ONE - they know about the paperless voting machines (which is just crazy); and they know about the voter disenfranchisement in Ohio.

The problem isn't that nobody knows about the fraud, it's that nobody thinks we can do anything to stop **Inc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
77. Electoral Justice
I think the name of the group is fine, but if it were to change, I voted 'other,' and suggest Electoral Justice.

I love Boxer's phrase. Plain and simple. I'm sure it'll go down in history whether we use it or not!

I don't like the word 'Stop' in the name. It's got a negative feel to it. I also feel like we need to move forward. What's done is done, and we need to take action for the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
78. Posted at AtA: A request from the election fraud-busters, reform planners,
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 07:47 PM by understandinglife
...and advocates.

Given that our focus is on stolen (aka fraudulent, disenfranchising) elections and all that needs to be accomplished to prevent another one, it is perhaps ironic that the name of the forum was changed without allowing those who have contributed so much to it vote.

I took the liberty (and appreciate your allowing it to happen) of offering a poll and the community voted.

The winning name is:

Stop Stolen Elections: Indict, Legislate, Advocate

It is a powerful name and one that encompasses the categories of activities that must be pursued if we are going to prevent another fraudulent, disenfranchising election.

If you are not willing to accept the vote and change the name would you be willing to sponsor a poll with the top two and accept an simple majority vote?

Stop Stolen Elections: Indict, Legislate, Advocate

Election Reform Advocacy and Action

For reference:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=302897&mesg_id=302897


Thank you for your consideration of these requests. I hope you will, indeed, continue to nurture this particular forum and perhaps allow it to function in a manner similar to the unique approach to grassroots activism fostered by Howard Dean.

Peace.

___________________________________________

A few thoughts to share with all of you, not included in the post at AtA.

To everyone who have made this forum very much like a community, I’d like to suggest that a bit of liberalism, of respect for diversity, be nurtured in our fraud-buster, reformist group. For instance, maybe we could welcome the wonderful KOEB nightly thread to return to our ‘home.’ Those needing a moment of mirth, a bit of escape from the grueling efforts to stomp election fraud would find that thread quite refreshing (note: I’m a straight male, even more happy with my wife now than when we were married ~ 35 years ago).

And, the occasional apparently tangential thread that a member of the community wants to bring to everyone’s attention should be encouraged; especially if it’s a topic that many of us are interested or/and one that requires immediate advocacy or support (e.g., supporting Senator Boxer and others who are showing the world our collective disgust with Ms Rice – a truly crucial message to help save any hope our efforts to promote Democracy will be ever again be credible).

Thank you all for your responses to the poll.

Irrespective of the outcome of the request to the DU administrators, I hope we can find creative ways to continue to grow the spirit of our special, intense, and fun DU forum (community).

BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION;24/7 (aka TBO;24/7)

(at time of posting to AtA; top two were, ERAA - 35 votes; SSEILA - 42 votes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. I agree with your KOEB thoughts...
It's nice to take a coffee break at the end of a long day of activism (research, analysis, emailing, phoning, writing, etc.).

KO is part of our work. He has been our only voice in major media. He is listed in the Hall of Fame on the http://thankyoupatriot.com/ site.

It says:

"Keith Olbermann

A special thanks must go to Mr. Olbermann, the only voice on any news network that dared to follow the story of the aftermath of the 2004 election from the moment Congressmen Conyers, Nadler and Wexler sent their letter to the GAO requesting an investigation into the Ohio election right up to the Elector challenge on January 6. Further, he did so without making a statement about what he thought of the proceedings or of the evidence, and without making denigrating comments about the thousands of people who were suspicious of the results as the list of "anomalies" and "irregularities" grew with every passing day - never did he call them "conspiracy theorists," "tinfoil hatters" or any other pejorative. He interviewed principles to get the latest news, and did so fairly. In short, he covered the story like a journalist. In a society that is allegedly concerned with the checks and balances that measure government integrity, his lone voice in an apathetic wilderness was loud and clear. Those interested in the truth owe him a huge debt of gratitude."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. I'm glad you agree and I think we need to encourage and be...
...mutually supportive of both some fun and 'off topic' threads that may appear tangential but to the member of our forum who posts them, the topic may well be relevant to the overall mission and goals of this forum.

In any event, a bit of flexibility and congeniality go along way to sustaining everyone's enthusiasm for what is going to be a mega-hard task -- saving our American franchise of democracy from destruction; restoring some credibility in what "America" means.

Peace.

TBO;24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. i am totally with you
i also think we should be able to have the KOEB threads here. this IS where he got a good part his popularity anyway. i also wish threads like earlier on senate hearings were allowed here too - the people here are very comfortable together and we have all developed a sense of bonding within the group throughout the roller-coaster of events in the last few months.

i'm afraid that if the rules of this forum get too strict, people will feel awkward and not know what to do and may feel hesitant to post.

and, we definately need the word FRAUD in the name. no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. All of this is quite frustrating
I believe the impetus for those calling for focus and a name change was the desire to weed out completely irrelevant and defeatist threads like "Dems suck," "Kerry sucks," "you're a fool if you believe there was fraud." NOT to get rid of what made this forum great: The constant flow of new information and the camaraderie.

I feel like I'm banging my head against a wall.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. exactly
i thought the change would be geared more to weeding out the naysayers so we can focus on making a change in this country without disruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. Here's something I posted to "peace patriot" in another thread..
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 10:44 PM by understandinglife
...that I want to share particularly with you and Faye:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=304399&mesg_id=304399

Perhaps we should just consider today a 'stress test' to our very effective and passionate community of fraud-busters, election reformists and democracy advocates and activists.

Let's accept the 'stress test' for what it is and use it as just one more 'steeling' event. Let's us read "I believe"; see all the names and all the responses and know that that is what this forum -- this COMMUNITY has become at DU.

And, let us bond even closer and refuse to ever allow anything to disrupt our passionate commitment to saving our American franchise of democracy.

We are creative, flexible, adaptive and determined citizens and we've just had another experience, together, and let's make the most of it.

No one can tell us that supporting Senator Boxer in every way is not essential to having her respond to our strategies and plans for investigating those who perpetrate election fraud and disenfranchisement and our strategies and plans for both a voters rights Constitutional ammendment and extensive reform of the format for voting.

And let's open our minds and our fun spirit to the KOEBers and welcome them to post that thread every week night. Those who don't care for color of tie debates and floatie hearts aren't required to read the thread. But, so much spirit and fun are associated with that particular 'tradition' and KO is still one of the few voices in the msm we've got. So, let's have fun and suppport the guy in all ways possible.

Peace.

AND NEVER FORGET TO BE THE BUSH OPPOSITION;24/7


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scatamooch Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
86. How The Right Wing Stole The West Wing...Again!
Edited on Fri Jan-28-05 03:32 AM by Scatamooch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
87. Locking
The poll question is now moot as the name has been changed. Please direct further commentary about the group name to the Ask the Administrator forum. Thank you.

Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC