elizm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:44 PM
Original message |
Developing story from Raw Story..Ohio recount and fraud? |
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
at last hard evidence! It looks like there will have to be a criminal investigation by the House Judiciary Committee. Hooray, Hooray!
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 08:49 PM by RaulVB
They manipulated the ballots, thus preventing the Kerry-Edwards votes from being counted, if I understood correctly!
|
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. not only manipulated/switched from Kerry to Bush |
|
where's the majority, if they had to take ballots and do cut and paste in the back room for a win, there's no majority.
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Well I learned that long time ago.
Kerry got more vote than the guy in the White House. That is a fact.
|
elizm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
it took so long for this to come out? Why not during the recount?
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Is almost 40 days past the "recount".
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. One wonders! Hi Raul...thanks for helping me out! |
|
Can you guys believe all of the crap that is building on these guys...they aren't even breaking a sweat!
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
zann725
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
21. I keep thinking maybe Arnebeck has been aware of this and other tampering |
|
SINCE the recount...and that was why he chose to change the venue of his claim.
This is indeed a huge discovery. And if there are several witnesses, and also photographs. And this no doubt happened in numerous other recounts (verification of which has probably been already obtained during the 40-day silence).
This IS the beginning! These brave people speaking up. We must keep the faith.
|
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Green recount people bullied by Ohio election reps. |
|
There was one woman who was run off the road, there were tires slashed (funny the MSM didn't cover that one), and the attitude was generally hostile. Sometimes they had to observe from 5 feet away or were not allowed to speak and sometimes it was obvious that the "random sample" had been prepared ahead of time, not to mention buddy buddy meetings of election officials with the Republicans (observers excluded), volunteers who were republican's one day and impartial observers the next and the free entry of Triad and other companies who were allowed to constantly access the machines during the process.
|
merh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. I think if you go back and look at the diaries of those that worked |
|
on the recount, they referenced this. I think the biggest obstacle there is to an investigation is that those responsible to the citizens to investigate and prosecute are repukes or part of the weed's admin, under the control of the repukes.
Maybe this will force their hands and make them investigate.
{{{fingers crossed}}}
|
Wilms
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message |
7. This thread is a dupe. |
merh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. That thread talked about the headline and the story to be released |
|
this thread has the link to the story. It is not a dupe.
|
RaulVB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
15. No, the link to the actual story is buried on the first tread (n/t) |
Gold Metal Flake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Hey, here is a thought... |
|
If these ballots are still extant, and can be provided for forensic review....
Well, ever try NOT to leave a partial fingerprint on the adhesive side when applying a sticker or a piece of tape?
|
elizm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. I love that thought!! |
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
AND WHEN YOU SQUEEZE THE LITTLE GUY YOU CAN CATCH THE BIGGER FISH!! FLY
|
theresistance
(595 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Let's hope it leads somewhere... |
enough
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
MissWaverly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
aren't they required by law to keep the ballots for 2 years. Of course the way the Republicans interpret the law, that's probably in nanoseconds.
|
emlev
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |
OKJackson
(166 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 04:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That's good stuff, we've got them on the run!
KEEP IT UP!
Keep writing Conyers! Keep writing Boxer! Keep writing Sensenbrenner!
Keep writing every congressman who has stood up in recent weeks for the truth!
|
rqstnnlitnmnt
(245 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
this is huge.
hopefully the blogosphere/airamerica will be all over this today...anyone sent this to Conyers/House Judiciary?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |