Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Nashua Advocate: GOP Claims Bush Won WI, Attempts to Divert Talk of OH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
nashuaadvocate Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:46 AM
Original message
The Nashua Advocate: GOP Claims Bush Won WI, Attempts to Divert Talk of OH
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 01:18 AM by nashuaadvocate
Find the new article here.

The News Editor
The Nashua Advocate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry won in Wisconsin
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. We take OHIO, Florida and New Mexico, they can keep Wisconsin!
Deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
I'm in Wisconsin and I vowed to move if * won.

If they want to investigate in Wisconsin, they need to check the entire state. I know two people who voted in my area, the Fox Valley, who stood in long lines (up to 3 hours) only to be told there were no more ballots where they were. They were sent to another polling place where they voted, along with many others. But neither one of them is sure that their vote was counted rather than tossed because they were technically at the wrong place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wasn't serious!
Sorry, I understand what you're saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No apology necessary Raul--I was just being dramatic n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hilster Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. make it stop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does the GOP reeeeeally want to go there?
I mean, they might be opening the door to a place they don't want to visit.

"What? You mean the Wisconsin count isn't accurate? Well. If Wisconsin is wrong, maybe we'd better take a closer look at some of the other states. I know. Let's start with Ohio....."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yep, that's why I WOULD ENCOURAGE THEM TO DO IT
If the Wisconsin "rethug" wants to play it that way...the more the "merrier", as they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashuaadvocate Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Us too: like the Petro Motion for Sanctions, this is a fight we *want* nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulVB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. As you said, a "gift" (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. By all means, if it isn't accurate, then lets recount WI, OH, FL,NM,NV....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Hi chalky!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m.standridge Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. In 1960, Richard Nixon tried to go there
and he got his feelings hurt.
He got recounts in a couple of states, and all it did was not only confirm JFK carried them, it added to the Democratic totals.
Last time (2000), W. asserted there were "irregularities" in Wisconsin and that he might ask for recounts in Iowa.
Initial MSM news stories implied they'd found some students in WI had engaged in vote-buying, or something, with some homeless people.
The whole claim, read rather awkwardly, and didn't make whole lot of sense ("vote buying" is a rather bizarre, naive kind of claim anyway--how would you ever know how someone had voted in an American election that features the secret ballot?)
Anyway, over about six months after the election of 2000, I followed news stories. The whole GOP claim fell completely apart. There was never any student activity involving the homeless or alcoholics. The whole thing was BS.
Bush also had backed away from the Iowa recount because he knew, as Republicans usually do know all too well, that all recounts nearly always do, is add to the Democrats' tallies, not the Republicans. There are a number of reasons for this, not the least being the now rather widely-known one, of poorer (Democratic) precincts tending to have the most malfunctioning election equipment.
On balance, it appears that our good Republican official hasn't done the math. Why should he? He can get headlines or media attention, and divert attention from Ohio, just by making an allegation, however groundless.
That allows the sweating, nervous media to slip into its "objective' status, "non-partisan" and just completely blow off Ohio from here on out, because some GOP yahoo in Wisconsin says "Well the Democrats cheated too."
They didn't. But it's the excuse the media has been looking for. That's the bad news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Let's send this to Sensenbrenner to investigate the election nationwide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, the Repubs are fast on their way to taking over California
They are smearing Kevin Shelley to try to get him to resign so they can supplant him with a republican and then they want to do redistricting. By 2006, if all goes the republican way, California will have no paper trail and a republican majority. No one is paying attention because of everything that is happening at a national level, but we cannot let them take California.

Below is a letter I sent to the Chronicle and the smaller locals:
Dear Editor:

Can we get a journalist, please?

While California's Secretary of State, Kevin Shelley, is being investigated for - horror of horrors - hiring Democrats and - gasp - having a temper - amongst other equally specious allegations, the really awful smell coming from Ohio courtesy of Ohio's Secretary of State and co-chair of the Bush reelection campaign, Mr. Blackwell, is being completely ignored by the Chronicle and other corporate media.

RawStory.com, an internet newspaper, is investigating and the newest allegations center around stickers placed on ballots in a county that decided the election.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=7

‘Why were there stickers on ballots in Clermont County, Ohio?’

By Larisa Alexandrovna | RAW STORY Staff

"Serious new election tampering allegations have emerged from an Ohio county,
where witnesses allege that stickers were placed on presidential election ballots,
RAW STORY has learned."

"Several volunteer workers in the Ohio recount in Clermont County, Ohio have
prepared affidavits alleging serious tampering, violations of state and federal law
and possible fraud. They name the Republican chief of Clermont’s Board of
Elections Daniel Bare and the head of the Clermont Democratic Party Priscilla
O’Donnell as complicit in these acts."

Our country is being threatened by traitors who are trying to subvert democracy and the Hearst Corporation is showing their hand by smearing Kevin Shelley while they are ignoring Ken Blackwell.

Dani Weber
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ROH Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Interestingly enough...
the exit polls in Wisconsin were spot on with the declared results in both the Presidential and Senatorial elections:
http://www.exitpollz.org/pages/wisconsin.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Maybe they want to lose.

Maybe the game here is to file some "Hail Mary" suits. If they get really really lucky, they get something out if it, if not, in 2006 and 2008 they can point back at 2004 and say -- "look both parties filed suits but nothing came of it, just give up."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC