|
I got an e-mail from a reporter at Madison.Com (I assume WI?) and he's suspicious as hell. Suggests letters to his paper.
You may send a letter to : tctvoice@madison.com
Suggest Wisconsin DUers go first.
Also suggest writing to a fellow at CBS (Editorial Director at CBS) to whom I have been feeding information: dmp@cbsnews.com
I'm working on the following for my local Mass newspapers. It's too long, so I may submit as an editorial. Everyone is welcome...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The dust has barely settled on what in America passes for a democratic election, and already the air is heavy from the smoking guns in Ohio and at Election Fraud Central (Florida). The brilliant Presidential puppeteer, Karl Rove, has mistakenly assumed that winning at any cost would legitimize an incompetent, divisive, and arrogant President and endear him to the bosom of America and the embrace of history.
The history of voting in America is the history of vote recounts and rigged elections. Sadly the former is impossible in about 1/4th of precincts where electronic (BBV) machines are used which leave no paper trail or permanent record. One needs to use the permanent record qualifier because not all electronic voting systems fail to leave a paper trail. Voting by such means is like making a bank deposit for which no receipt is received and about which the institution retains no hard copy. An election that cannot be audited is a bogus election. It is a felony on democracy and should be eradicated permanently from the electoral landscape (S 1980, HR 2239).
A key ingredient in the Bush Election Juggernaut is the smear campaign against exit polls. First of all, exit polls are like the canary in the coal mine. They are the election red flags historically and consistently accurate to less than 2% of subsequent vote tallies and often accurate to 0.1%. They are so accurate that in Europe elections are called on the basis of the exit polls. In America we never had any “wrong” exit polls of consequence until Election 2000, and then, only in Florida. The most common reason for exit poll discrepancy is not sampling error or skewing, but failure to count votes.
On November 2nd exit polls were done in 18 states throughout the voting cycle including sets of 4 each in Ohio and Florida which showed John Kerry winning comfortably to a statistical probability of victory of 99.9982%. Of course that does not prove fraud but it does send up alarms all over the landscape. What is indisputable and for which no logical explanations have been forthcoming are the following: (1) Exit polls closely correlated with vote tallies in every state except in those states using BBV machines or states like Florida that use electronic voting plus optical scanning; and (2) in every instance of exit poll and vote tally discrepancy, G.W. Bush was the recipient of the extra votes and never John Kerry. The Bush vote “bounce” ranged from +3% to +18% being +6% in Ohio and +7% in Florida.
Those vote inflations are just the beginning of the story. Winning Ohio for Kerry was a stretch, but most strategists agree that Kerry should have won Florida or had a razor thin margin despite the “hurricane sympathy votes” and the Hispanics. But Florida is the Bush Family Fiefdom and if fraud exists, Florida and not Ohio is the Mother Lode. After all, it is common sense not conspiracy to believe that Jeb Bush would do anything to guarantee his Brother's success.
Florida is about equally divided between BBV machines and optical scanners (leave paper), but the three biggest Democratic counties, , Broward, Palm Beach, and Miami-Dade have no paper trails making any effort to find uncounted Democratic votes futile. Even more disturbing is the fact that both Miami-Dade and Palm Beach reported a total of 142,753 more votes cast for President than registered voters in the counties
However, the differential between the registered voters and the actual votes is vastly more skewed for the Florida counties using Optical Scanning than BBV. Republicans gained 128.45% in counties using optical scan voting machines while Democrats had a -21% loss (yes, that is negative 21%). Some districts in Florida showed gains over 400% while one, Liberty County, gained over 700% for Republicans. Of course, some of this may be due to heavy Republican registrations, but this situation begs for a recount (with the only caveat being that many don’t consider optical scans as true paper trails because they can be reconfigured once in the computer).
If there were voting fraud in Florida one can almost be certain that a practice run was made before election 2004. Indeed, a Mr. Fisher who was a candidate from the 16th Florida District has submitted to the FBI information that he claims not only proves that the central computers were hacked, but who is responsible, how it was accomplished, and how they did the same thing successfully back in 2002. Certainly, the computers are highly vulnerable to hacking as demonstrated several days ago by Bev Harris of the nonpartisan group BlackBoxVoting.Org and Dr. Howard Dean.
Computer voting machines are also highly vulnerable to counting backwards (Broward); having touch screens default to the incumbent even if one uses the hard point of a pencil eraser (Palm Beach & Sequoia - continued all day long); manufacturing votes for Presidential candidates (Palm Beach: 542,835 votes for President with 454,427 voters turning out including absentees); and losing votes. The list is almost endless.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(562 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
