Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EVIL B*SH CULT Policy Comes Under Fire for Ignoring 'Fundamental Rights'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:42 AM
Original message
EVIL B*SH CULT Policy Comes Under Fire for Ignoring 'Fundamental Rights'
Edited on Mon Jan-31-05 11:14 AM by Karenca
Judge Backs Guantanamo Detainee Challenges
Bush Policy Comes Under Fire for Ignoring 'Fundamental Rights'

WASHINGTON (Jan. 31) - A federal judge ruled Monday that some foreign terror suspects held in Cuba can challenge their confinement in U.S. courts and she criticized the Bush administration for holding hundreds of people without legal rights.

Judge Joyce Hens Green, handling claims filed by more than 50 detainees, said the Supreme Court made clear last year that they have constitutional rights that lower courts should enforce.

The war on terror ''cannot negate the existence of the most basic fundamental rights for which the people of this country have fought and died for well over 200 years,'' she wrote.

The decision conflicts with a ruling two weeks ago by another federal judge based in Washington. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon found that last year's landmark Supreme Court ruling did not provide detainees at Guantanamo Bay the legal basis to win their freedom.

About 550 detainees are being held at the U.S. Navy base, accused of being enemy combatants.

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20050131102409990010&_ccc=1&cid=842
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Guantanamo Tribunals Ruled Unconstitutional by Judge-Detainees Entitled to
Edited on Mon Jan-31-05 10:49 AM by Karenca
Detainees Entitled to 'Due Process of Law'

WASHINGTON (Jan. 31) - A U.S. judge ruled Monday that the Guantanamo military tribunals for terrorism suspects are unconstitutional.
In a setback for the Bush administration, U.S. District Judge Joyce Hens Green also ruled the prisoners at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba have constitutional protections under the law.

''The court concludes that the petitioners have stated valid claims under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and that the procedures implemented by the government to confirm that the petitioners are 'enemy combatants' subject to indefinite detention violate the petitioners' rights to due process of law,'' Green wrote.

More than 540 suspects are being held at Guantanamo after being detained during the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan and in other operations in the U.S. ''war against terrorism.'' They are al-Qaida suspects and accused Taliban fighters.
Bush administration attorneys argued the prisoners have no constitutional rights and their lawsuits, challenging the conditions of their confinement and seeking their release, must be dismissed.

The tribunals, formally called a military commission, at the base were authorized by President Bush after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, but have been criticized by human rights groups as being fundamentally unfair to defendants.
Green's 75-page opinion was the unclassified version made available for public release. It stemmed from 11 cases involving Guantanamo prisoners.

Her ruling probably will not be the final word on the issue. A different federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 19 dismissed the cases of seven Guantanamo prisoners on the grounds that they have no recognizable constitutional rights and are subject to the military review process.
The cases could be appealed to the U.S. appeals court, and then ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20050131102409990010&_ccc=1&cid=842
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like another "activist" judge - she'll be gone by year's end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NationalEnquirer Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. At least SOMEONE gets it.
How long before they impeach this judge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. or she's found dead in a small plane wreck?.......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NationalEnquirer Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hah! Right, stick to flying airliners..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC