Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In 1/2 hour we find out if Dr. Dean and the DNC have a spine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:33 AM
Original message
In 1/2 hour we find out if Dr. Dean and the DNC have a spine
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 09:34 AM by Botany
If this has 1/10 of the crap that went on in Ohio it will smoke ....
Our job to do is what we did to the DSM ..... demand that the press
pays attention to it ....... NGU



DNC RELEASES STUDY OF 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN OHIO

Washington - The Democratic National Committee's Voting Rights Institute will present DNC Chairman Howard Dean their report on the conduct of the 2004 presidential election in Ohio. Copies of the report will be available at the press conference tomorrow and at www.democrats.org .

Who: DNC Chairman Howard Dean
DNC Voting Rights Institute Chair Donna Brazile
Julie Andreef, Ohio regional field director and practicing attorney focusing on election law
Cornell Belcher, president of Brilliant Corners Research and Strategies
Walter Mebane, Jr., Professor of Government at Cornell University
Dan Wallach, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Rice University.

When: Wednesday, June 22, 2005; 11:00 a.m.

Where: DNC Headquarters, 430 South Capitol St., SE, Washington, DC
Wasserman Family Conference Room
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Will it be broadcast on C-Span?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. GMTA!
I just asked the same thing :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. saw this from another post
CSPAN2 is scheduled to cover this:

Democratic Agenda
Democratic National Committee
Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
ID: 187286 - 06/21/2005 - 0:30 - $29.95

Durbin, Richard J., U.S. Senator, D-IL
Dean, Howard, Chair (2005- ), Democratic National Committee

Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean speaks about the Democratic Party agenda at the "Paint the Nation Blue" fundraiser.

...nothing even close on CSPAN.

Please contact CSPAN and suggest this be at least taped, if not broadcast live.

Suggest Events: Submit a public event that you think C-SPAN should cover - events@c-span.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So the report will be covered on C-SPAN 2, or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Guess not ?
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 09:47 AM by jsamuel
I sent them an email though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I just sent C-Span an email. Hope it's not too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. anyone know if cspan is covering it?
I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. What do you want Dean to say/do? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I want him to say it out loud!
FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Just the truth ....
..... i live in Ohio and saw and heard fraud 1st hand.

We have to get this out like the DSM and pound the press and force them
to cover the fact the election was stolen .....

time to hit bush square in the mouth and call him for what he is an unelected
weasel ..... and I apologize to all weasels .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emlev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Prosecutions are in order!
Does anyone know if there are any laws saying that someone proven after taking office to have been involved in rigging an election can't serve our their term? If not, time to draft some!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hey Botany, do you have a link to this report?
I'm not seeing anything on the dem site you had a link to.

:loveya: ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. No
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 10:06 AM by Botany
Nothing yet ...... I did send an e mail to cspan asking for coverage .....
can you e mail KO? and get the other EDVs to do the same?

But you do have a link to my heart ...... because you are my Fav EDV!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Here's the link
http://www.democrats.org/vri/ohioreport/index.html

want to read it myself before I send it out with wings of love. Gotta make sure it deserves the full EDV of the KOEB seal of approval! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Pg 10 of Exec Summary says NO widespread fraud...
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 10:15 AM by texpatriot2004
WTH?
edited to change explative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I just quit the party ....
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 10:51 AM by Botany
..... fuck 'em.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x378950#379002

go down to post # 86

That one line will be on every front page tomorrow ......
"no evidence of widespread fraud....."

3,800 registered voters produced 50 votes ..... Greene County
19,000 votes loaded after the polls were closed .... Miami County
and on and on ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Hey Dr. Dean: my socks are still on.
What the hell?

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. that asside
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 11:00 AM by jsamuel
at least they looked at it :shrug:

the problem is that they didn't look hard enough :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgr Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Fraud is for the courts to decide.
It would be highly improper to make the allegation.

It is very clear that the report documents voter suppression, and makes connections to minority voting rights--its pointing in a different direction, and is setting the table for a different accusation. You don't have to show fraud if minority voting rights have been abrogated.

Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. It's also highly improper to acquit them of fraud w/o investigation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgr Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Arnebeck? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A FULL INVESTIGATION W SUBPOENA POWER!
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 11:16 AM by mod mom
IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK? Why DIDN'T THEY INCLUDE KEY PEOPLE INVESTIGATING OHIO FRAUD INSTEAD OF PARTY people intent on covering their butts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Because the game is rigged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_aware Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. I only wish,
Dean had thought of this. I hope he can make it work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phlem Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Seems like a threat to National Security
Let's see,

Stealing the executive branch, killing Iraq and US citizens, and basically screwing the country into the ground. Wouldn't it be poetic justice to invoke the patriot act on these Fu(*s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbus Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
22. answer: no spine
we got the answer: no spine

Cliff Arnebeck will respond. I hope it is soon but the report is long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wheresthemind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. Or if we were wrong to the degree of fraud...
Which no one here ever wants to accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Internut Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. How can you even entertain such a heresy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Give us a FAIR court with FULL SUBPOENA POWER and then lets see what went
Wrong in Ohio. I found no where in this report of Blackwell's damning report of Lucas County BOE.

http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/elections/lucas.htm

This report includes the fact that REPUBLICAN VOLUNTEERS were allowed UNSUPERVISED ACCESS to UNSECURED BALLOTS prior to the election, as well as this list:

*failure to maintain ballot security
*Inability to implement and maintain a trackable system for voter ballot reconciliation .
*failure to prepare and develop a plan for the processing of the voluminous amount of voter registration forms received.
*issuance and acceptance of incorrect absentee ballot forms.
*manipulation of the process involving the 3% recount.
*disjointed implementation of the Directive regarding the removal of Nader and Camejo from the ballot .
*failure to properly issue hospital ballots in accordance with statutory requirements.
*failure to maintain the security of poll books during the official canvass
*failure to examine campaign finance reports in a timely manner.
*failure to guard and protect public documents.
*failure to guard and protect public documents ....etc.

THIS CAME FROM THE SOS OFFICE, WHAT ABOUT THIS DNC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgr Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Vote suppression can be fraudulent.
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 11:39 AM by mgr
Fraud requires demonstration of intent. We have been long winded on addressing the anomalies, but other than being voting irregularities, are just beginning to attack the intent element.

Mike

deleted N/T in header
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chi Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. As long as there was a thorough, fair investigation,
I'd openly accept being wrong.

An investigation isn't too much to ask...is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. So, what's the consensus, Spine or No Spine? From the Exec
Summary that I read...

I'd say No Spine but I haven't read the entire thing. Has anyone here read it all? What's the gist of it? How can they say no fraud? How could they possibly say that? There was definitely FRAUD. I know it. We know it. Hell, most everyone I know knows it. WTH? I am so sick of the DNC toning things down. I hope they have an ace up there sleeve. I like Dean. I like that he's been speaking out strongly against the Rethugs. I hope he's got something good in the works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. 1/2 a Spine but they were Freeped on "theft." Better than nothing & can
go up.

Hey, we have people here on ERD who swear up and down that Bush won. It 's on the table so thats great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Shark Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. Just read the Executive Summary...
...it so does NOT smoke. Sorry, business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
34. Up or down vote? No spine!
I'm going to re-post my comments from the other threads here--we now have 3 threads going simultaneously on this topic--then I'm going to stick with one of them--this first one:

"DNC releases report on 2004 presidential election in Ohio"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x379633

56. Strategy...

Kerry won the exit polls, and the ways in which the official total varies from the exit polls have been proven to be impossible.
The Democrats blew the Republicans away in new voter registraton in 2004, neary 60/40.
The vast majority of new voters voted for Kerry.
The vast majority of Independent voters voted for Kerry.
The vast majority of Nader voters voted for Kerry.
The vast majority of Gore voters (who won the popular vote in 2000) voted for Kerry, and got all of the above to vote for Kerry, too. (Switch Gore/Bush voters were a wash.)
Bush's approval rating is down to about 40%! --and has been bad for over a year.
The vast majority of Americans disapprove of Bush, and of every major Bush policy, foreign and domestic, up in the 60% to 70% range.

Major Bush partisans own and control the counting of our votes in virtually ALL voting systems using "trade secret," proprietary programming code!

What's to understand here?

This DNC report is crap. And I think we have to start hunting down and rooting out the corruption within the Democratic Party on the matter of electronic voting systems. We've begun naming names in California. Let's get on with it.

We can't do anything about the Bush fascist Republicans. We CAN do something about the corrupt and collusive Democrats. And that's what we must do.

------

As I said elsewhere, they did not have to use the "fraud" word to describe the 2004 election. But their failure to identify and oppose BUSH PARTISAN OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF THE VOTE COUNT is a catastrophic omission.

I still have been unable to read the full report--it won't fully download--but the pieces that I've been able to download and those that have been posted here are telling me that they OMITTED this crucial information. AND the "revolving" door employment between election officials--both Rep and Dem--and these private, secretive electronic voting companies. AND the lobbying corruption. THESE are the critical problems. And they appear to have been completely left out.

They go for optiscans. Optiscans are crap. They, too, run on secret, proprietary software--owned and controlled by the same Bushites.

I'm really utterly appalled at such deliberate blindness. And unless they have a "secret plan" to address these matters at the state/local level, then we are not going to get any help from the Dem leadership--who are currently ignoring and obstructing on these critical matters--and this is going to be a very long and tough fight.

------------

It's our right NOT to vote on Bushite-controlled voting machines, stupids!

------------------------

65. More strategy...

Re: this report.

1. The DRE section is quotable in our state/local fights--to at least get rid of the worst of these election theft machines. Send to local/state Dem legislators and election officials (and any honest Republicans you may know of).

2. The optiscan section will be used against us in our fight for open source code or paper ballots/hand counts. It needs to be debunked (and we will run up against corrupt Dems on this one.)

3. Do they ANYWHERE mention secret, proprietary software? (--still can't download the full report).

-----

Re: general

The DNC is A YEAR BEHIND the grass roots (us), on understanding this situation, and YEARS behind the Bushites, who have understood it all very well for years, and have acted like the fascists they are to gain control of the vote count with highly insecure and fraud-prone electronic voting systems controlled by Bushites.

The "generals" at the DNC are "fighting last year's war." In fact, they're fighting a "war" that is DECADES old--enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. They are way, way, way behind the Bushites. The Bushites ALREADY have a plan in place--the phony, private Baker-Carter "Commission"--to FEDERALIZE election systems under Bush Cartel control, and take the matter of election systems and voter databases as far from the people as they can get it. Our ability to solve this critical problem at the state/local level will be destroyed. That is the B/C goal, in my view.

And the Dem Party is obviously clueless about this (or corrupt, some of them) and will likely APPLAUD it because it has a "PAPER TRAIL"!!!! (god...)

A word about Ohio: Ohio was election fraud plan B, in my opinion. The highly visible violations of the Voting Rights Act on election day was risked BECAUSE Kerry's victory was looking like a blowout. The electronic percentages scam was not enough (and this would mean that it was probably mostly pre-set programming). That was plan A. Plan C was the "terrorist alert" partial shutdowns of the vote in urban areas, probably in the west, that was so carefully prepared in the "news" leading up to election day.

It took a combination of plan A and plan B to keep the Bush Cartel in the White House (with a sufficient fraudulent vote margin to be able to claim a "mandate"--or at least to make that a headline for a day). Plan C was not needed (except in Warren County.) (If Kerry's margin had been 20% instead of 7% to 10%, we would have seen Dick Cheney's plane in trouble over the Pacific on election day, leading to a vote shutdown on the west coast. So I believe.) (He inexplicably flew off to Hawaii two days before the election, cuz Hawaii was promising to turn "red," don't you know?) (--har, har).

Conclusion: the DNC's obsessive focus on Ohio is, a) an attempt to ameliorate black voters, who are rightfully outraged by what took place there (AND in Florida and other places); b) an attempt to deflect attention from the utterly corrupt and fraudulent election SYSTEM that was foisted upon us (for whatever reason they are attempting to do this--probably mostly their own guilt and malfeasance); and c) evidence that they are stupidly worrying about whether anybody will ever vote again--instead of strongly acting to insure that our votes will in fact be counted (work that must be done at the state/local level).

They STILL despise the grass roots of this party. That has not changed (even with Dean). They're STILL largely pro-Mideast War. That has not changed. (And they don't mind Bush taking the rap for the deaths and the cost.) Many of them are very corrupt on several major matters--including war profiteering and tie-ins ("revolving door" employment and perks.) Although the election facts, and all the polls consistently over time, show a big anti-war majority, and huge disapproval of all Bush policy, the Dems STILL by and large are not acting like representatives of the majority (with some exceptions). They talk about winning the yahoo vote (even Dean did this the other day). They talk about "framing" issues to win over rightwing voters (as if they needed to be won over--they are very much the minority!). And damn few of them are talking about illegal war, about Bush's baldfaced lies about the war, and about torture.

Some of this is just perception. The corporate news monopolies--who colluded on election night in creating the ILLUSION that Bush won, by ALTERING the exit poll results on everbody's TV screens--are stifling the message of those Democrats who ARE trying to represent the majority. But other Dems are actively playing along--out of cowardice, or corruption.

I don't envy Dean his job, working with such a party. I think the man is highly intelligent and has good instincts (and is not himself corrupt). But jeez...

This election was OBVIOUSLY stolen, and the Dems not only fail to acknowledge this, and not only perpetrate the myth that it was not stolen, but they AREN'T DOING WHAT'S NECESSARY to correct the situation. Simple, no-brainer things--like getting the Bushite companies out of our elections!

The DNC report may have been a compromise that Dean was forced to make. Let's hope so--and that he WILL get the party to do what is necessary. If not, we're on our own, citizens, and will have to get this done somehow without the Democratic party.

We sort of knew that (especially after the Kevin Shelley thing in Calif.). This DNC report points further in the direction of Dem cluelessness and/or corruption. They are patting themselves on the back--and people are applauding them--for acknowledging the most egregious crimes against federal election law in Ohio. But their blindness and stupidity in STATING that the election is not challengeable, and in NOT strongly attacking the utterly corrupt heart of the election SYSTEM--the "privatization" of vote counting in Bushite hands--has placed the DNC on the wrong side of this vital matter, as the enemy.

Once again, we have to fight THEM, before we can ever get at the Bushites. Once again, they are running interference for Bushite election theft.

The headline tomorrow will be that the DNC and Howard Dean say that this election was not a fraud. How is that for a kick in the butt?

I think we need to be realistic about all this. We can still win, and we WILL win--but the DNC has now made our task all the harder.

--------

Peace Patriot - Response to Reply #58

67. Exactly right, Nothing Without Hope!

"Most of the public have no idea about the electronic fraud, but many Dem voters know about those long lines. Fix those, and it looks good. The GOPs would probably go along with that, because it removes visible evidence that is hard to suppress ***while keeping intact the central machine of fraud."*** --Nothing Without Hope (emphasis added)

I think targeting Dem officials' corruption on electronic voting systems has to become a big part of our strategy in fighting this fight.
-------------

(Nothing Without Hope posts the electronic voting recommendations in the DNC report, post #62...)

--------------

71. Thanks for the info, Nothing Without Hope!

So they DO say something about secret, proprietary software--item #5 above (although NOT about who owns it!!!), but they go on to say (and how is this for speaking out of both sides of your mouth?)...

"Vendors are welcome to protect their intellectual property with copyrights and patents, but their full designs must be subject to public scrutiny....".

I'm choking on it.

-----

Item #1: "Precinct-based optical scan systems are the most 'accurate' voting systems available today."

This is not only NOT TRUE, it is totally unacceptable. And they're PUSHING **ES&S**--one of the two most criminal election theft companies in the country, funded by the far right.

------

"The computers used to tabulate election results are a tempting target for election fraud..."

Really, I'm on the floor laughing (and crying...).

------

Yup, we're going to have to target the corrupt Dems (people like Diebold shill Connie McCormack, head of elections in Los Angeles). That's the only way we can overcome the huge disadvantage that this DNC report has loaded on our shoulders.

We have to show people WHY the Democratic Party is not calling for dumping these electronic machines into Boston Harbor NOW!

Ordinary Americans will understand the war argument as well. Look how many Dems voted for the war, and are profiting from it! THAT's one reason why they won't cry foul on the election. They LIKE Bush's war.

But the most convincing argument is the outright corruption of so many Dem election and other officials on the electronic systems. They're benefiting from the HAVA largesse (billions!) and lavish lobbying. They're being wined and dined in Hollywood and Beverly Hills. They're looking to future lucrative employment by these companies. They like being esoteric experts riding above ordinary voters who don't have a clue any more how their votes are counted. It's a game of "experts" and "professionals"--what should be simple for every voter to understand. This "expertise" thing is a also a form of corruption. (It's OUR government! It's OUR votes, goddammit!). And some of them are just plain bought and paid for. And all of this heavy corruption in election systems affects legislators and other public officials and party leaders as well.

In California, the Bush Cartel showed what would happen to any public-minded election official who fights Diebold or ES&S or any other Bush donor. They will be ruined by black ops/secret dossier campaigns.

Fear and corruption are what's happening. And I think we need to face this front and center, and take it on.

Because if we don't, we are constantly going to be frustrated and stymied by these questions, "If the Democrats think the election was stolen, why don't they say so?", "If the Democrats don't trust electronic voting, why are most of them for it?," and "If it's important, why isn't it in the news?"

How many times do you want to hear these questions over the next year?

This means hurting some of our own. But we've got to realize that anyone who shills for Diebold and ES&S (and a few others--such as Sequoia) is NOT "one of our own." And there are far too many of these bad actors within our own party.

-----

72. P.S., one of the things that Kevin Shelley was cracking down on, in...

California, was "revolving door" employment between state and county election officials and private voting machine companies.

---------------

(From the second thread on this subject...)

(The first part of my comment was posted before the DNC report was available.)

"DNC report online now!"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x379765

10. Here is my comment on this matter, as to hope for the DNC.

I posted this on the other DNC report thread in response to someone who said that Donna Brazile's focus has been on voting rights.

27. It's about our right to vote!

Donna Brazile is a beautiful woman and her story of her rise in politics is an inspiring tale. For more about her, see: http://authors.aalbc.com/donnabrazile.htm

But I have to ask of her, and of all other leaders of the Democratic Party over the last several years: WHERE WERE YOU WHEN THE BUSH CARTEL VOTING MACHINE COMPANIES TOOK OVER OUR ELECTION SYSTEM WITH ELECTRONIC VOTE COUNTING MACHINES RUN ON SECRET, PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE WITH NO PAPER TRAIL?

Democrats should have been screaming bloody murder about this long before the 2004 election. That they did not was the most catastrophic failure of Democratic Party leadership in our lifetimes.

We MUST, MUST, MUST get our voting systems back into the public venue NOW. The only way to do this is at the state/local level, where control over voting systems still resides, and where ordinary people still have some influence. But the DEMOCRATIC leaders' silence, corruption and collusion on this matter, across this land, at every level, is one of our biggest obstacles to reform.

I hope and pray that this report will radically alter party policy on this matter, and will, a) inspire a Democratic Party housecleaning of corrupt election and other officials; and b) call for paper ballots and hand counts until we can purge our election system of private, partisan Bushite companies and outrages like secret, proprietary vote counting software.

That's what is needed. We'll see if they come through. But BEWARE of any FEDERAL solution that would have to be implemented by Bush's "pod people" in Congress, or any solution that takes power over voting systems further away from the people at the local level. Beware!

That was a viable solution in 1965--when the Voting Rights Act was passed by a DEMOCRATIC Congress especially to insure the right of black citizens to vote. This is a FAR DIFFERENT power situation, in which the election thieves are running our federal government, and WILL NEVER restore our right to vote. Never! Any meaningful federal legislation WILL BE gutted, or it will be a 'Trojan horse' by which the Bush Cartel will gain total control over centralized election systems and voter databases.

True election reform must be, and can only be, done at the state/local level, in the present circumstances. And if the DNC does not recognize this fact, then they are not sincere and they will be ineffective at restoring transparent, verifiable elections.

Just look at what HAVA did--the total corruption of our election system--and ask yourself if you want Tom Delay's fingers in the "solution"!

----------

Posted at: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x379633

---------

I would add that focus SHOULD BE placed on the utter failure of the Bush Cartel to enforce the Voting Rights Act in Ohio, Florida and elsewhere in 2004--and on its egregious and official violations of that Act. But that is just one part of the story. It speaks to INTENT to defraud, as well as to the theft of the election in Ohio and Florida in particular. But the overt and visible vote suppression can distract attention from the main problem--Bushite control of the vote count nationwide--which is the problem that most needs fixing. We cannot force the Bush Cartel to obey the law. But we CAN get our election system back into the public's hands, via state/local election rules (the only way it can be done, at present), and we can do it quickly if the Democratic leadership helps out. But they are mostly not helping at the moment, and in some cases (California, for instance) the Dem leaders are ignoring and obstructing--because there are so many Dem election officials who have been corrupted by HAVA (billions of dollars flooding into the states for purchase of shoddy, insecure, fraud-prone election systems owned and controlled by Bushites, and the lavish lobbying of these election theft companies!)

I noticed a comment by Howard Dean, early on, to this effect--that election reform has to be done locally. That makes me hopeful about this report.

---------

From reading the quick skims of the report by others, I gather that they do NOT focus on throwing private Bushite voting machine companies out of our election system, and say little or nothing about it. So, forget 2006 and 2008. This is going to be a lo-o-o-o-ong hard battle first of all within our own party.

It's a battle we MUST fight and win.

I would say: Bombard the DNC with their catastrophic failure to protect our right to vote from Bushite companies and their goddamned secret source code. Jeez. It's a no-brainer!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Yes so head up the fight.
But don't say Howard Dean is included in your hitlist. He's done an awful lot of work on this issue and whether there was widespread fraud in ohio or not, that doesn't change the fact there was fraud. That doesn't change the truth that Blackwell's BOE members had re-write tabulator access. Just a little manipulation is what it took to throw the election. Fitrakis report and others summarize it. Dean captures that and stays on the message. Remember the issue of voter disenfranchisement is as severe and some places worse than electronic vote manipulation.

It's a good report. Not A+ material but its far better than the original whitewash report someone was going to force them to write.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Filius Nullius Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. New York Times: "In Ohio Vote, Woes, Yes, Fraud, No"
Yep, the Times has this story prominently displayed in the Washington section of its Thursday electronic edition. Here is the url to the article: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/23/politics/23voting.html?th&emc=th. The headline is "In Ohio Vote, Woes, Yes, Fraud, No." This will only reinforce the determination of the mainstream media to stonewall and ignore electronic voting fraud in the 2004 and future elections. We have been screwed again by the DNC. They are worse than useless because they are actually undermining legitimate efforts to unmask the widespread and systematic fraud that occured on November 2nd. Perhaps a parallel Democratic party inspired by "the Real Yellow Pages," namely, the "Real" DNC, needs to be organized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. Socks still on. :(
I hope for their sakes this is truly preliminary, and their next report actually goes into depth. As it stands, this is insulting. How much did this thing cost, anyway?

John Conyers needs to have a long talk with Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC