Voting 2.0 Will Your E-Vote Count?

[kster]

Voting 2.0
Will Your E-Vote Count?
By Cheryl Gerber | Illustrations By Dash Shaw


Imagine this: A Trojan Horse unleashes thousands of illegitimate votes and disappears without a trace, election commissioners bypass laws, uninvestigated computer glitches and easily picked locks in voting systems, no federal oversight holding e-voting vendors accountable—yes folks, elections can be stolen.

Since the 2000 Presidential election, problems stemming from the use of electronic voting machines have called into question the foundation of American democracy—the US voting system. At the forefront of concerns are security issues surrounding the use of Direct Recording Electronics , better known as touch screen computer voting machines, and their lack of a paper trail in the form of an auditable paper ballot. Widely reported irregularities from voting districts around the US have alarmed many and opened claims of stolen elections. Some even doubt the legitimacy of the outcome of recent US elections. A team of top computer scientists has been working diligently to resolve the many underlying design problems in the e-voting system that leave it open to cheating. Stalled by the federal government, and with doubts about e-voting continuing to spread, these scientists have instead turned to state governments and the National Science Foundation for help.

"Maryland, where I live, uses Diebold DREs, which are an ideal opportunity for cheating," said Dr. Avi Rubin, Technical Director, Information Security Institute, Johns Hopkins University. "In fact, you couldn't come up with a better opportunity for cheating. There's no ability to audit or recount, and the entire process takes place inside the computer, which is not transparent."

In May 2004, Rubin co-authored an analysis of electronic voting systems, raising concerns about lack of security, for the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the world's largest professional organization for technical standards. He also served in 2004 as a poll worker and election judge in Baltimore County, Maryland, where he lives. These and other experiences have only served to raise his concerns about the possibility for cheating via the use of electronic voting machines.



http://www.chronogram.com/issue/2006/01/news/

[Wilms]

1. kick n/t

[mainegreen]

2. So lets cheat...

In our favor!!!!


:P

(just kidding agent mike)

[BeFree]

4. We will, we will

There are now many people working on getting the skinny on the workings of e-voting machinery. It will come to pass that the backdoors to the machines will be opened and millions of votes for Democratic candidates will be inserted. It's just a matter of time, as long as e-voting is allowed to poison the roots of democracy.

Think of it, instead, as fertilizer!

[nicknameless]

3. K&R

[Einsteinia]

5. nice summary n/t

[autorank]

6. Kester: "A man of rare taste and good jusgment..."

This is a great find. I ran intno it under "election fraud" searching for the daily thread. Maybe the MSM/CM will get a clue and start stealing these ideas!!!