I swear they're cloning them!
More from sweatheart,
Study Affirms Elections Chief: He Told Us SoTOM JACKSON
Published: Jul 10, 2005
K urt Browning wasn't looking for anything special on the day marking his 30th anniversary with the Pasco County elections office, but surprises are often the spice of life, even within a bureaucracy.
Thus did Browning, Pasco's elections supervisor for the past 24 1/2 of those 30 years, gladly received a welcome alternative to the usual cake and bouquet of balloons: affirmation of what he has been saying since before Florida's pregnant chad crisis of 2000.
Direct recording electronic devices - DREs, or, more commonly, touch-screen voting machines - are, indeed, safe, accurate, reliable, simple, accessible and eminently hacker-proof.
This conclusion, embraced for years by Browning, recently was reached by the Pacific Research Institute, a San Francisco-based, nonpartisan think tank dedicated to ideals of freedom, opportunity and individual responsibility through free-market policies.
In ``Upgrading America's Ballot Box: The Rise of E-Voting,'' authors Sonia Arrison and Vince Vasquez dismiss as unfounded Internet-fired rumors of conspiracy, fraud and rigged elections tied to touch-screen voting. Like Browning, Arrison and Vasquez lament the hysteria of partisan critics who latched onto misinformation and half-truths as proof that DREs had been programmed to produce a desired result.
``There is no serious research that shows e-voting rigged the results of the <2004> election,'' they wrote. ``Claims by groups such as blackboxvoting.org gloss over the complexities in elections. ... They also ignore the reality that complaints with e-voting machines were negligible.''
Guess Who Really Likes It
The PRI study also says that e- voting has broad appeal among groups with traditional ties to Democrats or otherwise liberal candidates - minorities, the elderly and the disabled - who describe the process as user-friendly.
<more>
http://pasco.tbo.com/pasco/MGB0N3REYAE.htmlSteven P.