Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today and the Day in History (ok two days ago, but play along)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 04:48 AM
Original message
Today and the Day in History (ok two days ago, but play along)

Today (er, January 5th, 2005)




Citizens' voting comments in

By RICHARD VALENTY
Colorado Daily Staff Writer

Thursday, January 5, 2006

snip

The Boulder County chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) also delivered an RFP comment asking the County not to purchase DREs because, in ACLU words, “virtually all existing electronic systems are associated with unacceptably high malfunction and error rates.”

snip

http://www.coloradodaily.com/articles/2006/01/06/news/c_u_and_boulder/news2.txt


And the Day in History (January 5th, 2001)


Oh, the irony!

This is the suit that the ACLU filed in GA that resulted in Diebold Paperless DREs statewide!

Read it and weep, or laugh as the case may be.




Andrews v. Cox:

ACLU Seeks to Remedy Georgia's 'Fatally Flawed' Voting System (1/5/2001)

snip

"We have filed this lawsuit in order to ensure that by 2002, minority voters and indeed all voters in the state of Georgia can be confident that their voices will be heard and their votes counted on Election Day," said Laughlin McDonald, Director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project based in Atlanta.

In its legal complaint, the ACLU called the state's voting system "a hodgepodge consisting of antiquated devices, confusing mechanisms, and equipment having significant error rates even when properly used."

"Even Gov. Roy Barnes and Secretary of State Cathy Cox have acknowledged the serious flaws in Georgia's voting system, but unfortunately the remedy lies with a legislature that may not propose an adequate solution," said attorney Kenneth S. Canfield, an author of the legal complaint.

Georgia law currently authorizes the use of a variety of mechanisms for recording the votes cast during an election, including paper ballot, voting machine (lever), vote recorder (punch card machine), electrical scanning systems, and certain electronic voting systems.

While the ACLU found a high level of error in punch card machines (4.7 percent), it said that the 2.1 percent error rate for the more sophisticated optical scanners was also unacceptable under state and federal law.

The state's failure to accurately record votes deprives its citizens of equal protection and due process as guaranteed under state law and by the United States Constitution, and violates the federal Voting Rights Act, the ACLU said.

To remedy the violations, the voters are asking the court to permanently block the state from conducting any future elections in Georgia "using machinery that fails to correctly and accurately record every vote cast." If the state is unable to provide an accurate system, the lawsuit asks the court to assume supervision of the next election.

snip

http://www.aclu.org//votingrights/er/13021prs20010105.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Proud ACLU member here
Thanks for posting this, Wilms!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC