Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama Joins the NeoCons (AEI) to Reform Elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:17 PM
Original message
Barack Obama Joins the NeoCons (AEI) to Reform Elections
Let's not freak out until we know more. Dispite how disappointed we were with Carter/Baker one could argue that we gained a bit and didn't lose much.

Still, imagine my surprise to see this.



The American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution Launch Joint Election Reform Project

Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) Gives Inaugural Remarks

Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2006
PRESS RELEASES
AEI Online (Washington)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 26, 2006

Today, two of America�s key policy research institutions--the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI) and the Brookings Institution--launch the new AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project. The program is a joint effort to monitor the implementation of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) and to develop a bipartisan policy agenda for further improvements in the administration of elections.

Introduced in the wake of the contested 2000 presidential election, HAVA was passed by Congress in 2002. The law provides funds to the states to enable them to replace punch card voting systems. It has also created an Election Assistance Commission to help administer federal election laws and has set standards for the administration of federal elections by states and local governments.

The new AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project will encourage constructive changes in HAVA and its implementation. It will also synthesize election-related research and strengthen the link between the research and policy communities. The effort began today with the initiation of a new website, www.electionreformproject.org. The site will be regularly updated and will include information on voter registration, technology, access, early and absentee voting, provisional balloting, election administration, and voting integrity issues.

Said AEI president Christopher DeMuth: "The best way to preserve democratic institutions and good government is to ensure that elections are executed freely and fairly. As the United States spreads democracy throughout the world, we must do all we can to protect the democratic system at home. I look forward to another successful partnership with the Brookings Institution as we move forward with this important research."

snip

http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.23752/pub_detail.asp




http://www.electionreformproject.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. the Brookings Institution is a liberal Dem org. so no big deal
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Hence my taking a breath. However...

Looking at the website seems a little too "Voter Fraud"y for my comfort.

They seem to endorse e-voting though acknowledge the GAO report.

We'll see.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama was the best thing since sliced bread when he was elected eh?
Now he gets beaten up over not supporting the filibuster, which I can kind of agree with. However I can't agree with saying that Obama is joining forces with the Neo-Con's. Sorry ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yeah it was pretty harsh,
I should have softened it by including the Brookings Institution especially since Obama just made the opening remarks.

He's not on the board of this new group. :blush:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. And Al Gore...
...presented his MLK speech with the support of Bob Barr, before a stage set by an alliance between conservative and liberal organizations. Judicial Watch and Sierra Club launched the lawsuits to reveal Cheney's papers. We can, on occassion, find common cause. I don't need to oppose a common sense measure just because some knuckledraggin bigot also sees some sense in the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I agree.

And AEI :scared: me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't happen to believe diebold stole votes. I believe it defaulted
improperly, it can be hacked, too few were put in Democratic districts. And 45 other ways of fooling with the intent of the law.

If there is an argument to be made that machines (verified ones) can save money for each state.. then I'd be for them. As long as there is transparency... I don't think states can avoid not keeping up with the times and saving money in the long term. As of now, states have to take money away from schools and programs and health to balance the books.

Really - the sooner we can all come together as democrats on a strategy to get really transparent & cheap elections.. the better. At the same time gerrymandering and vetting voters by voting group are being fought. We need to fight all the election malfeasance.. in every way. Every day. And not get tunnel vision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Err...defaulting improperly IS stealing votes...when it alway defaults to
...(surprise) Bush.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The annecdotes of faulty defaulting were on both sides from the reports
I read. More defaults to Bush.

Still - we need tranparency and I would trust Obama & the Brookings Institute to formulate policy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC