Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CA State Senator Bowen Looks To Improve Election Audit Process

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 04:36 AM
Original message
CA State Senator Bowen Looks To Improve Election Audit Process
From Bowen's office:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:Evan Goldberg
February 6, 2006 (916) 651-4028/(916) 855-9176

BOWEN INTRODUCES MEASURE TO IMPROVE ELECTION AUDIT PROCESS AND THE ACCURACY OF ELECTION RESULTS

SACRAMENTO – Closing a looping in the auditing procedures used by California’s elections officials is the goal of SB 1235, which was introduced today by Senator Debra Bowen (D-Redondo Beach), the chairwoman of the Senate Elections, Reapportionment & Constitutional Amendments Committee.

“Forty percent of Californians vote by absentee ballot and thousands of others take advantage of in-person early voting opportunities before every election, so the fact that some counties exclude more than half of the ballots cast in any given election from the auditing process is fairly unnerving,” said Bowen. “The manual audit is designed to ensure the electronic voting machines and the ballot counters tallied the results correctly, but there’s absolutely no way to conduct a meaningful audit if you’re only re-counting half of the votes.”

Under California law, elections officials are required to conduct a public manual tally of the ballots cast in at least 1% of the precincts to check the accuracy of the votes tabulated by the electronic or mechanical voting systems. The law also requires the precincts subject to the audit to be randomly selected by elections officials, but it doesn’t define “random.”

SB 1235 (Bowen) improves the election auditing procedures in two significant ways. First, it requires elections officials to include absentee, provisional, and all other ballots that are cast before Election Day or at satellite voting centers in the 1% audit. Second, it ensures the precincts subject to the manual audit requirement will truly be randomly selected by requiring elections officials to use either a random number generator to select the precincts to be manually counted or any other method set forth in regulations the Secretary of State would be required to adopt.

“This is about the integrity of our electoral system and at a time when significant questions are being raised about the accuracy of our voting equipment, this is a loophole that needs to be closed,” continued Bowen. “The mandatory manual audit law was created forty years ago when fewer than 4% of the state’s voters used an absentee ballot. Now, more than 30% of California’s nearly 16 million voters are registered as permanent absentee voters and nearly 40% of the people who voted in the November special election did so by absentee ballot.”

Last year, Bowen authored SB 370, which was signed into law over the objections of the Secretary of State and the California Association of Clerks & Elections Officials. It requires elections officials to use the paper produced by the accessible voter-verified paper audit trail (AVVPAT) that all electronic voting machines are required to have as of January 1, 2006, to conduct the 1% manual audit and to use the AVVPAT in the event of a recount.

SB 1235 will be heard in the Senate Elections, Reapportionment & Constitutional Amendments Committee later this year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC