FogerRox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-09-06 07:37 PM
Original message |
Proposed law in NJ to outlaw paper ballots |
|
ASSEMBLY, No. 2448 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 6, 2006
Sponsored by: Assemblyman RICHARD A. MERKT District 25 (Morris)
SYNOPSIS Requires use of electronic voting machines in elections; reimburses certain counties for funds spent on election equipment.
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT As introduced.
An Act requiring electronic voting machines be used in elections in this State, supplementing Title 19 of the Revised Statutes, and making an appropriation.
Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
1. a. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, only electronic voting machines having the following characteristics shall be used in any election conducted in this State:
(1) an LCD screen which displays the ballot to the voter;
(2) touch-screen selection of the voter's choices;
(3) a clearly visible electronic mark which indicates each of the voter's selections;
(4) scroll buttons which allow the voter to move through the ballot's pages;
(5) a "cast-vote" button to record the voter's selections;
(6) a print-out and an electronic cartridge which indicate the results of balloting when the polls close; and
(7) to the extent applicable, the criteria set forth in R.S.19:48-1 as determined by the Attorney General.
b. The use of mechanical voting machines, electronic systems using ballot cards, or paper ballots in any election is prohibited, except that paper ballots may continue to be used as emergency ballots, provisional ballots, or absentee ballots.
2. a. Each county which purchases electronic voting machines in order to comply with the provisions of this act shall be reimbursed by the Attorney General for the cost thereof; and
b. a county that has appropriated and expended county funds for the purpose of upgrading election equipment at any time during the five-year period immediately preceeding the effective date of this act may apply for an amount of State funds equal to the county funds appropriated and expended for that purpose.
3. There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Law and Public Safety such amounts as may be necessary to effectuate the purposes of section 2 of this act, as certified by the Director of the Division of Budget and Accounting.
4. This act shall take effect 180 days after enactment.
STATEMENT This bill prohibits the use of mechanical voting machines, punch card electronic systems using ballot cards, and paper ballots and provides that only electronic voting machines will be used in elections in this State. All other types of voting machines would be prohibited, except that paper ballots could continue to be used as emergency ballots, provisional ballots or absentee ballots.
Under the bill, the Attorney General would reimburse counties for the cost of purchasing the new machines, and any county that has spent county funds for the purpose of upgrading election equipment during the five-year period immediately preceeding the effective date of the bill may apply for an amount of State funds equal to the county funds spent for that purpose.
|
Syrinx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-09-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Of course the sponsor is a Republican |
FogerRox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-09-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. & Hesa former NJ Dupty Attorney General-- the NJ AG runs elections in NJ |
|
Would this man have had contact with voting machine vendors?
|
punpirate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-09-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's not like Merkt is... |
|
... way behind the news cycle or anything.
Oh, my mistake... he's a Republican. :)
|
no_hypocrisy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-09-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I would expect Governor Jon Corzine to veto the bill if passed. |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 07:59 PM by no_hypocrisy
Not enough republicans to override his veto. P.S. Prior DU post re. NJ Appeals Court deciding on unconstitutionality of electonic voting. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x412385
|
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-09-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Decapitating the hydra of corruption requires millions of |
|
hands and swords. The truly amazing thing is that they keep doing this even though they know we're on to them. These criminals will not stop until they are in prison. Paper ballots are the only solution.
|
Bill Bored
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-09-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
6. It's got everything but the vendor's logo on it. Which one is it Roj? nt |
Wilms
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-10-06 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Consider this lawsuit, directed at VVPAT-Less DRE's |
FogerRox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-10-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
to have a provision for a small face DRE-- I dont think its Sequoia. Since NJ is about 65% Sequoia-- it may be that another venfdor wants in-- when the 2005 VVSS becomes mandatory-- all the new Sequoia equipment will have to be replaced. Which is a great oppurtunity for another vendor to make some inroads in the NJ market.
Think ES&S or Diebold.
|
Bill Bored
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-10-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I hear NY is considering Avante |
|
But perhaps not the op scan. Know anything?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |