And so it begins. This is from the Moonie Times, but in time it'll be covered in other papers, CNN, etc., assuming it hasn't already. News stories like this one plant the idea that Democratic candidates will not fare as well as would be normally expected. Maybe I'm overly paranoid, but it seemed like this was how it started in 2004, followed over time by polls statistically skewed in Republican favor to "balance" out the weak democrat voters. This way, the public won't be surprised by the results in November.
The CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll reported last week that the Democrats led Republicans among registered voters in the generic congressional survey by 50 percent to 43 percent, a seven-point margin that could give Democrats enough victories to take control of the House, if their supporters participate in November's elections.
But a deeper analysis of these numbers by David W. Moore for the Gallup Poll said, "It is likely many voters will not do so" because turnout among registered voters tends to be lower than that among "likely voters" who say they plan to vote and usually do.
In his analysis, Mr. Moore writes that Gallup's "experience over the past two midterm elections, in 1998 and 2002, suggests that the numbers tend to overstate the Democratic margin by about 10? percentage points."
"Given that Democrats currently lead by seven points, that could mean that among people who will definitely vote, Republicans actually lead by three to four points," he said.
Republican election strategists long have maintained the so-called generic numbers, in which voters are asked which party they will support in the elections, without mentioning a specific candidate, skew in favor of the Democrats.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060227-123359-5955r.htm