Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

law firm papers focus in case of Diebold information leaked to writer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 11:21 AM
Original message
law firm papers focus in case of Diebold information leaked to writer
Edited on Mon Apr-24-06 11:24 AM by Algorem
Jones Day papers focus of theft case
Diebold information leaked to writer

Monday, April 24, 2006

http://www.cleveland.com/business/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/business/1145867701235570.xml&coll=2

Alison Grant
Plain Dealer Reporter

A criminal case involving Cleveland law firm Jones Day, Summit County voting machine maker Diebold Inc. and an obscure, part-time Hollywood actor is expected to unfold in a Los Angeles courtroom today.

The actor, Stephen Heller, has been charged with felony theft of confidential records from a Jones Day office where he was temping in 2004.

Heller is alleged to have given the records to an investigative writer who had just published a book saying Diebold had installed uncertified voting systems in California. A copy of the records landed in the hands of an Oakland Tribune reporter who used them to report embarrassing details about Diebold's hasty use of uncertified software with its machines.

The prosecution of Heller has raised eyebrows because it is unusual to bring criminal charges in a case like this. Critics say Heller qualifies as a whistleblower who should be protected. Jones Day scoffs at that, saying Heller stole its legal papers and moreover broke a confidentiality pledge he signed when he started at the law firm. The firm also says it's important to defend attorney-client privilege, which it says Heller violated...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. IIRC, you ony get whirstblwer protcetion if you declare it before you
spill the docs. True?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Heller doesn't owe duty under attorney client privilege cuz he's no atty!
only very indirectly could they make the case that he knew of some duty of the ATTORNEYS because he was instructed to follow those orders.... possibly the result is different under CA law but bar associations only regulate bar members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who has his back?
Is there a fund?

Funny how the GOP payed 1.5 million to defend that Tobin guy (phone jamming case) up in NH..... hope the good guys Heller's back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clear case of whistle-blowing
I am sure every employee everywhere signs some sort of confidentiality agreement, so let me get this straight... so long as a company makes its employees and temporary employees sign confidentiality agreements, they can break the law with no fear of retribution?



BESIDES, the information he leaks sounds like information that should be public anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patriothackd Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Legal defense fund
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC