from what I could find by googling it. I'll defer to your view though since you're on the ground and engaged in Ohio. And even if she's already on board then a question about it at the forum would still be a good thing.
Here's what I found, for what it's worth:
Report from a speaking engagement on 6/2/2006 (paraphrase by someone who heard her speak):
As Secretary of State she would advocate for repeal of the voter ID requirement in HB 3, and in fact testified against it before the law was passed. She said that there is a lawsuit being prepared to try to stop the voter ID requirement before the general election.
If she is stuck with the voter ID requirement as Secretary of State, she declared, she could issue the IDs at the voting place.
http://ohio2006elections.blogspot.com/2006/06/secty-of-state-brunner-d-speaks-to.htmlFrom her petition when she was campaigning for a veto of HB-3:
HB-3 will mandate that voters present an ID before voting. Voters without ID will be forced to vote a provisional ballot that may not be counted.
Fill out this petition and we will deliver it to Governor Bob Taft and tell him to veto this bill.
Dear Governor Taft,
Please veto House Bill 3. It will create longer lines at the polls, put my personal information at risk, and disenfranchise thousands of Ohio voters.
This is a voter discrimination bill.http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/12/ohio_house_bill.phpFrom a transcript of an interview in February, '06:
Gloria Ferris: On that note, since you were interested in that voter challenge, what as Secretary of State would you do to ensure the integrity of our voting system so those kinds of challenges wouldn’t be necessary?
George Nemeth: By the way, that’s Gloria Ferris of GloriaFerris.net.
Jennifer Brunner: Well, first of all, I want to say House Bill 3 is out there right now still looming, and I want to thank all of you for anything that you may have done which I know was significant in getting the word out about some of the problems with House Bill 3. And there are more problems than what I pointed out, but to get the idea across and to try with any amount of hope to impact what the legislature was doing, we focused strictly on the voter identification provisions in the Bill. And what’s happening right now with House Bill 3 is they are calling it, “Election Reform,” but if you go back to in the 1860s when the constitutions in the south were changed after African Americans got the rights to vote, they had massive election reform bills, and they weren’t really election reform bills; they were really meant to try to keep certain people from voting in the system. And when you have people as sophisticated at understanding elections, as Jeff Jacobson, who is the architect of that Bill, one of the architects of that Bill, I don’t believe for a minute that the real thrust of this Bill is election reform.
So the reality of it is, when I become Secretary of State (let’s just work from that premise), I will be stuck with whatever they have passed. I have a record working as a Judge in the Common Pleas Court, setting up a drug court, trying to help people be productive in the community and in the system to want to keep the system open, always keeping it safe, always keeping it fair, but keeping it open to as many people as possible.
So in terms of what I will do is, if we have a requirement where people have to show photo identification to be able to vote, I will find a way, just as a State-issued ID, I’ll find a way to issue an ID, even if I have to at the polling place.
http://www.meetthebloggers.net/jennifer-brunner-transcript/ Bolding is by me.