Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul Jacobs: Throwing good money after bad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 12:09 PM
Original message
Paul Jacobs: Throwing good money after bad

Throwing good money after bad


By: Paul Jacobs - Commentary

At last Tuesday's Riverside County Board of Supervisors meeting, the public learned that elections in this county are a closed shop. The supervisors never refuse the registrar of voters, which is why they've spent 30 million of our tax dollars on machines that voters increasingly avoid using.

Since the introduction of electronic elections there has been a marked increase in the number of voters choosing to vote by absentee paper ballot. But the supervisors and their appointed registrar can never admit to making a $15 million mistake and then doubling it, so they keep throwing more money at a voting machine system that is incredibly complicated, unwieldy and unpopular.

The civic group Democracy for America ó Temecula Valley once again tried to convince the supervisors to form a year-round citizen's independent voting integrity commission to have a team approach to ensure Riverside County's election procedures are transparent, secure and accurate. The stubborn supervisors ignored sound arguments for having an outside audit of our election system and rejected the notion of citizens having access to meaningfully observe our votes being counted. Why do county officials insist on excluding citizens from the process?


All five supervisors have miserably failed their fiduciary responsibility to protect the public's interest in every conceivable way. Electronic elections promised to save taxpayers $600,000 in annual ballot printing expenses, but with the foray into electronic voting, the amortized cost has averaged $5 million per year. Thirty million dollars could have paid for the county's paper ballot elections for the next 50 years, and no voting machine will last that long.


More: http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/07/16/opinion/jacobs/71506193035.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R.
The Economics of e-voting is a factor too often overlooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Quite true.

I think the reform community missed the boat on that one.

A MEME could be, "They use your tax dollars to steal your vote".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. the voters need to purge these officials
We launched a state wide effort to replace any
board of election officials who were pro DRE.

We also have tried to get rid of county commissioners.

Lots of political pressure was put on some county
commissioners who were pro DRE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. It was never about saving money but controlling the outcomes while
providing a windfall to GOP operatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC