Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taking The “McCain Out Of “McCain-Feingold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
livvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 07:04 AM
Original message
Taking The “McCain Out Of “McCain-Feingold
It's hard to believe that people can't see through this guy. I used to respect him, but after the infamous pretzelnut embrace, I lost it. I still respect his service to this country during 'Nam, but that's about it.
What a hypocrite.


Taking The “McCain” Out Of “McCain-Feingold”

Submitted by Christy Setzer on July 28, 2006 - 1:36pm.

So much for standing on principle: “Maverick” Senator drops sponsorship on signature issue; Feingold, Shays, Meehan trudge on without presidential contender

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), perhaps the politician most frequently associated with campaign finance reform, has dropped his name out of the latest reform legislation. McCain’s former partners on campaign finance—Sen. Russ Feingold, and Reps. Marty Meehan and Christopher Shays—introduced a bill Wednesday addressing the public financing of presidential campaigns. But 2008 presidential contender McCain was conspicuously absent from the lead sponsorship.

According to today’s New York Sun,

The bill is largely identical to a measure all four men introduced in 2003, but this time around Mr. McCain is not on board.

>snip

McCain himself once said, “Reform is a process. It is not a one-time fight.”

“Unfortunately, McCain doesn’t seem to believe his own words.” Said Senate Majority Project spokesperson Christy Setzer. “Voters today can smell cynicism like piranhas smell blood and react the same way. It’s a matter of time that people realize that if John McCain doesn’t believe in his principles, then why should voters believe in John McCain?”

>more

http://www.senatemajority.com/taking_the_mccain_out_of_mccain_feingold

Here's a link to the Sun article:
http://www.nysun.com/article/36949?access=362441

A longtime advocate for campaign finance restrictions, Meredith McGehee, said she believed Mr. McCain's decision stemmed from a desire to avoid criticism if he decides to forgo public financing during the Republican nominating contest.
"He does not want to be caught in a position where he can be accused, rightly or wrongly, of hypocrisy," Ms. McGehee, policy director at the Campaign Legal Center, said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Russ should've sided with Kerry on public financing instead of McCain's
idea of limited "reform" that still coddles the corporatocracy. He let McCain cover himself with glory while delivering SQUAT to the greater good.

Clean Money, Clean Elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What was Kerry's idea? How was it different? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Clean Money, Clean Elections public financing of campaigns bill.
Kerry crafted the bill and presented it with Paul Wellstone in 1997. Russ chose at that time to side with McCain and his idea of reform. Only 5 senators were with JK and PW on the bill, then, and McCain-Feingold took up all the media attention for the next few years.

I think it's past time for Clean Money, Clean Elections bill to be submitted again in the post Abramoff world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks. I couldn't agree more with your idea.
I think it would make a big difference if elected officials didn't have to be so dependent on raising funds all the time. They might actually have the time to find out what their constituents wanted, and represent them the way they should.
I'll have to do some research and find out more details of the Kerry/Wellstone bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think it should be resubmitted as a memorial to Wellstone.
It would be fitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC