Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

C-SPAN: Electronic Voting News Conference (2 p.m.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:17 AM
Original message
C-SPAN: Electronic Voting News Conference (2 p.m.)
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 11:18 AM by Patsy Stone
http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/schedule.csp

News Conference

Electronic Voting Machines

Election Data Services
Kimball Brace , President, Election Data Services

Mr. Brace talks about an updated study on voting equipment usage for the November 2006 election.

This was originally scheduled for 1 p.m., but the Snowjob was pushed back from 11:45 to 12:15, so I guess this is delayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks
!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. On now. it will be interrupted by Hastert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. in general
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 04:04 PM by marions ghost
disappointing. At least they had Felton- computer science professor from Princeton-talking about how easy it is to install undetectable code which will change results.

Gary Smith--Forsyth County GA Board of Elections, Diebold defender = particularly unconvincing.

However Barbara Simons is doing her best to tackle the really tough questions and makes sense.

---------------

Bio of Barbara Simons
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/article.php?id=2074

In addition to serving on the Board of the Verified Voting Foundation, Barbara Simons is co-chair of ACM’s US Public Policy Committee (USACM), which she founded in 1993. She was President of ACM, the premier organization for computing professionals, from July 1998 until June 2000.

An expert on electronic voting, Dr. Simons was a member of the National Workshop on Internet Voting that was convened at the request of President Clinton and produced a report on Internet Voting in 2001. She is also participating on the Security Peer Review Group for the US Department of Defense’s Secure Electronic Registration and Voting (SERVE) Project.

Dr. Simons is a Fellow of ACM and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. She received the Alumnus of the Year Award from the Berkeley Computer Science Department, the Distinguished Service Award from CRA, the Norbert Wiener Award from CPSR, the Outstanding Contribution Award from ACM, and the Pioneer Award from EFF. She was ed by C|NET as one of its 26 Internet “Visionaries” and by Open Computing as one of the “Top 100 Women in Computing.” Science Magazine featured her in a special edition on women in science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm watching the replay now
Kimball Brace made some references that made it sound like he is familiar with this forum of at least the prevalent themes. He said Democrats in particular are pushing for hand counted ballots and absentee ballots but they might regret what they wish for and it's not a panacea. He emphasized that absentee ballots, if not filled out correctly, could be rejected or improperly read by the machines especially if you try to erase something.

Also, he said voting equipment is a "once in a lifetime purchase." He said it's not like buying a PC where you upgrade to a new one every few years. "You buy it and you live with it until you retire and someone else takes over." Brace said that was the reality of voting machinery and the budgets simply weren't sufficient to make frequent changes.

He called optical scan a very delicate process. "If timing marks are off none of the ballots will be counted right. That may have been part of the problem in Cuyahoga County in the May primary."

Brace said the over votes were still somewhat prevalent in optical scan since some voters will inevitably circle the donut hole instead of filling it in, and the machine isn't equipped to read a situation like that.

I only caught the last 10 or 15 minutes but those were the highlights of that final portion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC