Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Man Of The Year" (I saw it and its a great opportunity for us!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:59 PM
Original message
"Man Of The Year" (I saw it and its a great opportunity for us!)
Last night I decided to take a break and treated myself to the local late evening showing of "Man Of The Year" which opened yesterday. I strongly suggest that you all go see it. Here are a few quick thoughts, without trying to be a total spoiler:

"Man Of The Year" is a somewhat dark comedy in which a computer software "glitch" (FAILURE!) causes national TV comedian Tom Dobbs (Robin Williams) to get elected President of the USA. The story begins when a fan suggests a run for the White House during Dobbs' TV show, and a subsequent national grassroots internet movement gets him onto the ballot in thirteen big states as an independent candidate. After an invitation to participate in the National Presidential Debate, Dobbs gets revved up with dynamic anti-major-party and vote-for-change rhetoric that hints at a totally over-the-top version of our movement's own David Cobb on the campaign trail (OK, maybe if David became a TV comedian and decided to have rock-star style staging to his speeches!) Or perhaps more likely Tom Dobbs evokes Kinky Friedman, now running for Governor in Texas, who has one of his real-life quips on gay marriage actually used by Dobbs in the film.

Dobbs’ total honesty and jabbing humor resonate with enough voters that, although he is not expected to win, results coming in his favor from the thirteen states on election night seem plausible enough to cause his election to be ultimately accepted by the American public. But in the meantime, an honest employee of the Delacroy Voting System Company (supplying all machines nationally to the election) learns of the software problem that in reality threw the result to Dobbs. Will she be able to get the word out? And should she?

As the tale unfolds, “Man Of The Year” portrays the voting machine company as creepy, greed-laden, negligent, and willing to lie, cheat, steal, or even hurt or kill to sell their product and cover up their problems. (Sound familiar??) “It's the PERCEPTION of legitimacy that's important, not the real thing,” (Goodness gracious, Linda Lamone has a new career in screenwriting?) says lead Delacroy lawyer Alan Stewart, portrayed by Jeff Goldblum (native Pittsburgh actor and jazz pianist extraordinaire) as a smarmy Mark Radke type but with a frightening and evil streak. Some other choice phrases: “Voter Confusion” is mentioned repeatedly when describing non DRE voting systems and past elections, and “...although the machines do not have a paper trail...It appears that exit polls are flawed...” intoned by a news anchor discussing unexpected results on election night in a deja vu of 2004.

Although nothing in the film is "real" (as in real names, other than "Tweety" Chris Matthews and some other TV personalities playing themselves), lot about this film feels REALLY FAMILIAR and in many cases scary to this election activist watching it late at night. The inability of the whistleblower to be heard or taken seriously evokes a female Clint Curtis (or maybe us all!), and repeated suspenseful scenes in bedrooms and hotel rooms brings "suicide" victim Ray Lemme eerily to mind. Black pickup trucks on the Beltway and Delacroy private planes on the tarmac at BWI recall some of the most far-out fears and claims tossed around during the Ohio Recount and elsewhere. And the Delacroy DRE and voting booth itself looks like a cross between a futuristic iMac and a colorful lime green version of the ES&S iVotronic on its four-legged stand. One has to wonder how much homework and lurking in our own movement was done by the screenwriters and directors.

"Man Of The Year" does not address the enormous constitutional problems that this totally plausible scenario would create in a real Presidential election, nor does it get into too many of the nuts and bolts of electronic voting. But the voting scene, where Tom Dobbs casts his vote for himself, purposely gives pause in the pace of the film as if the movie is wondering along with the rest of us whether Tom's vote -- or anybody else's -- is really being counted. And the ending is as "right" as we all could wish for in real life.

This film is a great opportunity for our movement. Even after midnight, people were talking about voting as they left the theatre. If our member groups would do meaningful flyering outside theatres, with flyers giving links to national and state group sites, and other sources of good information, I believe we could educate many about the problems with electronic voting and gain many new allies from the public.

Official movie site HERE:
http://www.tomdobbs.com/

Marybeth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick; We saw it last night great fantastic and puts e-voting to shame!
:kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. demodonkey, sounds wonderful
I have not been to a movie in a long time - and this is one film I really feel like going to.

Thanks for the review

And cheers to the film makers! Where the MSM failed - they picked up the pieces


:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks so much for the recommendation and the detailed review. K&R.
This really does sound well worth seeing. I rarely go to the movies, anymore, either, since none of them interest me. But this one sounds like a winner!:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for the review
My daughter and I are going to see it this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yellow Horse Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R ...I saw it today...
Get those election integrity flyers out to the theaters because people are talking.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. A great film. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just saw it........Keith Olberman needs to run for President.
Although Steven Colbert might be able to bamboozle the simpletons on the right. Imagine their suprise when they discover what satire is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kewl!
The light at the end of our tunnel is the coming train wreck of an election on Nov. 7.

Be prepared to be the media on the 8th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just got back. I actually thought it was more effective making the
issue an unintentional error rather than fraud. Calls attention to how error prone these machines are and avoids the "conspiracy theory" label.
For those of us familiar with vendor politics it was not far-fetched at all. The only inplausible thing for me was that they would never let someone will "accidentally" when those in control know how to rig them to get the desired results. But better for our purposes that they didn't play it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emlev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Interesting point, Amaryllis,
I just got back from the movie, too, and was bummed that they made it an apparently "accidental" glitch. But maybe you're right that that'll be more effective.

I noticed that the theater where it's playing in my town is in a little shopping center, which means that the entrance is on private property--making it more difficult if not impossible to distribute leaflets there (too many entrances to the private property to do it effectively there).

I've been suggesting that someone make a flyer and post it online so people can download, copy and distribute at the movie. No one has done it yet. I hope someone will. It's a great self-contained task for somebody to do who's not already up to their ears (or beyond) in working on election integrity but wants to help.

Anyone reading this: if you'd like to do it and think you don't know enough, do a rough draft and post it to this forum. We'll help you refine it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Anyone with half a brain can draw the logical conclusion that hacking
or rigging would be easy to anyone with access. He showed means, motive and opportunity. It will play bettter to people like Faux news watchers this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I agree, once people see and understand
that the voting machine can make a mistake, then its only a matter of time before the people realize that the machine can also be manipulated.

I think the show was great for our cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just got back "two thumbs up" it will
definitely get alot of people to question the use of these machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Looking forward to seeing it.
I heard about this film a while back when it was first written - alot of people know the votes get stolen, they just needed to understand it in a way that could be believed.

Pretty sad when it comes to a movie doing that, but movies were able to do it on other serious matters, like Rain Man and autism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC