Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I respectfully disagree with Mr. Frank D. Russo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:19 PM
Original message
I respectfully disagree with Mr. Frank D. Russo
So far, out of 15,837,108 registered voters in the state, 7,919,490 votes have been tallied. In 2002, the last election for governor (other than the recall election), fewer voters voted, 7,594, 228 out of 15,303,469, according to one set of information from the Secretary of State's office.

We had more registered voters in the state at the time of the 2005 special election. There were 15,891,482 voters then, even though it was an "off" year. 7,968,751 voted in that election or 50.1% considered very high for a special election.

In the recall election of 2003, another "special" election, there was a 61.2% turnout--extraordinarily high. 9,415,860 of 15,380,536 voted.

The high point for registered voters in the state was in 2004, a Presidential election year where interest was high in the Bush-Kerry race. California had 16,557,273 votes and there was a turnout of 75.9% or 12,572,735 voters.

So, the numbers of registered voters has declined and when when one considers the increases in the state's population and in the number of eligible voters, this figure is more dramatic. Combine that with a low turnout and the divide between those who vote and don't is the largest ever. The concerns of the Public Policy Institute of California study, The Exclusive Electorate, we reported on are all the more important.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=459181&mesg_id=459256

which is based on this report, (which I have not read yet)
California's Exclusive Electorate
http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=705

Registration and mailing problems have persistently been present in great numbers at least from the time I started watching complaints by voters - it outnumbers any other complaint in the State. The mismanagement of actual voter registrations needs to be included, investigated and remedied -
As far as LA County goes - I highly suspect since 1999 when the database system was changed from IBM to Diebold we have had a systematic problem - whether this is a deliberate or incompetence issue remains to be seen.

my 2 cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. It wouldn't have to take this long to HCPB's.
But I take it your post is about the low number of registered voters, given the population increase, perhaps as a result of faulty or fraudulent voter database management. Correct?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC