Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9% Failure of DRE Printers, ADA Touch-screen Not Accessible

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 10:06 PM
Original message
9% Failure of DRE Printers, ADA Touch-screen Not Accessible

9% failure of iVotronic VVPAT, and disabled can't vote on ADA iVotronic.





North Carolina was a Beta Test for the VVPAT in 2006

We tried to get touchscreens banned in NC back in 2005
when we introduced our verified voting bill.
http://www.ncleg.net/committees/jointselectcomm_/january72005mee_/mercurinclegisl/mercurinclegisl.pdf

BUT - Election directors persuaded lawmakers to allow DREs, and only if
they had the toilet paper ballot or a "ballot" that couldn't be handled by the voters.

Our biggest opponent against VVPB, George Gilbert,
Director of Guilford County - told the state legislature in August 2005 -
that the touchscreen paper trail was unreliable,
and he didn't recommend it.
http://www.ncvoter.net/downloads/HouseElectLawAug10Gilbert.doc

Citizens of Guilford County lobbied their BOE and BOC in favor of optical scan,
and against touchscreens.

We had an advocate for the blind to join us in lobbying for optical scan
with the Automark:


Dottie Neely, Guilford CO. Social Worker for the Blind went to county commissioner meetings
and opposed the purchase of touchscreens.She stated that they were not in fact truly accessible. She is legally blind.
http://www.yesweekly.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID=603&TM=48903.21

Well, as we predicted - the touchscreen printers failed -
and the machines were not accessible to the blind:


Guilford County: Printers Fail on Touch-screens
GREENSBORO — The system meant to produce a paper backup of votes cast on
Guilford County’s electronic voting machines failed in many cases during
the election Nov. 7.

About 9 percent of the printers attached to the county’s voting machines
had a jam or other problem.

In many cases, that problem made the paper record generated unusable
for purposes of a state-mandated audit, according to county elections
director George Gilbert....
http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061215/NEWSREC0101/61215003/-1/NEWSREC0201

This November, Dottie Neely went to the polls, and found that the
"disabled accessible" touchscreens were not accessible,
after waiting an
hour for someone to come and turn it on. The machine was difficult to use,
and would only allow Dottie to vote if she selected a straight ticket!
http://www.yesweekly.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID=1877&TM=49981

Gilbert wants the media and public to think that the state is going
to allow the paper printer to be removed,
and have it replaced with
an audio recording device. (Ted Selker's?).

Guilford taxpayers have already been unneccessarily bled for $1.3 million
over the amount of the state/federal grant
- because Gilbert doesn't
like paper ballot/optical scanners.
Now, Gilbert expects taxpayers to cough up $1.4 Million more.
- For machines that don't provide a reliable paper ballot/trail.
- For machines that the disabled can't vote on.

For a Rube Goldberg machine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Higans Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Live free or Die Bold.
Edited on Wed Dec-20-06 10:09 PM by Higans

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know anything about the Ivotroics, or even what business
their mfg. is in, but Diebold has been making ATM's for YEARS, WITH a printer mechanism attached! I won't say there's NEVER a jam, but they sure are VERY VERY infrequent!

How damn hard can this be? Orinters are simple, and the technology to make them work is simple. Why are these companies making this sound like rocket science????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like everything is going according to plan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC