Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SEC subpoenas voting machine maker Diebold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 03:50 PM
Original message
SEC subpoenas voting machine maker Diebold
SEC subpoenas voting machine maker Diebold
Diebold, in a formal SEC inquiry, is required to produce documents on how it recognizes revenue.
May 10 2007: 1:00 PM EDT


NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Diebold Inc., one of the world's largest makers of electronic voting machines and automated teller machines, said Thursday it received a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena in March seeking documents related to how the company recognizes revenue.

The North Canton, Ohio, company said it is responding to the subpoena and continuing to cooperate with the SEC. It disclosed the subpoena in its quarterly report filed with the agency.

Rage against the machine
Diebold announced last May the SEC had opened an informal inquiry in the matter, and three months later said the agency upgraded the probe to formal status, which gives the SEC subpoena power.

In March 2006, Diebold (up $0.10 to $47.91, Charts) said it would reduce fourth-quarter 2005 revenue by $7 million and net income by $4.2 million, or 6 cents per share, to defer some election systems revenue into future periods. It said it would recognize the deferred revenue and associated earnings between 2007 and 2010.

more at:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/10/news/companies/diebold.reut/?postversion=2007051012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zonmoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. anybody else think that a large part of their revenue stream
for election years will be payments by the gop for rigging the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. "...to defer some election systems revenue into future periods." Hm-m-m.
Could be the Congr Dems' HR 811, where they get more billions to consolidate their election theft gains and expand into "new markets," say New York.

Interesting how our leaders pay such careful attention to the regulation of money, and none to how our votes are being counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-11-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's this check to Clarence Beeks for ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC