Offer of Reward for Evidence of Tampering)

[snot]

Just got this, don't know if authentic:

>From: [e-mail]
>Date: November 13, 2004 11:42:50 AM MST
>To: undisclosed-recipients:;
>Subject: This is interesting...
>
>
>$100,000 REWARD FOR EVIDENCE OF VOTE FRAUD
> Justice Through Music
>
> http://www.jtmp.org/
>
> Justice Through Music, which strongly supports the democratic principles of
> transparency and honesty in the electoral process, is offering at least a
> $100,000 reward to any person or persons who provide conclusive and
> verifiable evidence that the results of the 2004 presidential election were
> not correctly tabulated because of one or more of the following reasons:
>
> 1) hacking into the voting machines;
>
> 2) software or coding problems with voting or tabulating machines;
>
> 3) multiple counting by machines or humans,
>
> 4) improperly implanted codes in voting machines;
>
> 5) tampering with voting machines, voting cards or final tabulation numbers;
>
> 6) officials or machines not counting all the votes or adding votes;
>
> 7) official influence which changed vote totals, or 8) other problems with
> vote tabulation not noted here.
>
> All information and evidence should be submitted to <[e-mail]>.
> Questions should be submitted to <[e-mail]>.
>
> In order to receive the reward, the evidence provided must be sufficient to
> affect the outcome of the presidential race, and evidence from more than one
> state can be used for that purpose. If a person who provides the information
> desires confidentiality for any reason including a fear of retribution, he
> or she should indicate that in their submission. A board of five persons
> will determine the disbursement of the reward on or before February 1, 2005.
>
> Persons who want to make a tax-deductible contribution to this reward fund
> can do so through the secure PAYPAL donation button on the right. We want to
> provide the strongest incentive possible for people to come forward with
> substantial inside information, so make your donations generous. In the
> event no one meets the criteria for the reward, all funds donated to the
> reward fund shall be used to insure that all future votes are verifiable
> through a countable paper trail.

[Jasper 91]

1. I heard Randi Rhodes talking about it two nights ago

I can't see anyone claiming, no matter how large the reward, because surely they would be landing themselves in gaol.

[HEAVYHEART]

2. kick

[Carolab]

3. Not necessarily

not unless they perpetrated a crime; there may be someone who justs "knows something" but didn't "do anything".

[Jasper 91]

4. That's the thing , how would someone just 'know something'?

It's not the sort of thing that would be discussed, even between friends, if only one was involved. Another thing, wouldn't the perpetrators be fearing retribution from 'The Planners', if the fraud was proven because of their loose mouth?