Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEW BALLOT SCANNERS FAIL IN 2 OUT OF 2 TESTS IN CUYAHOGA COUNTY OH!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:37 PM
Original message
NEW BALLOT SCANNERS FAIL IN 2 OUT OF 2 TESTS IN CUYAHOGA COUNTY OH!
Test Of New Ballot Scanners Fails

POSTED: 5:06 pm EST February 29, 2008
UPDATED: 5:22 pm EST February 29, 2008
CLEVELAND -- The first public tests of the new optical scanners at the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections have failed.

Chief Investigator Duane Pohlman reported that the board ran two tests of the scanners on Friday, and during both tests, the computer repeatedly showed an error message.

Read more: http://www.newsnet5.com/news/15453424/detail.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. OSU Mortiz School of Law Professor warned of Cuyahoga County here:
OSU Mortiz School of Law Professor warned of Cuyahoga County here:

Moritz School of Law-5 Things to Keep your Eye On:

Administering the March 4 Primary in Ohio


February 19, 2008
?Edward B. Foley
Director, Election Law @ Moritz
Robert M. Duncan/Jones Day Designated Professor of Law
Moritz College of Law


It is widely believed that Ohio’s primary on March 4 will play a pivotal role in determining the Democratic candidate for President. If Obama wins the statewide popular vote, the pundits proclaim, his victory likely would propel him to similar success in Pennsylvania (on April 22), and the party’s “superdelegates”—who by all accounts will control the outcome of the party’s national convention in Denver—will fall in line. Conversely, if Clinton prevails in the Ohio primary’s popular vote, then she would be expected to do the same in Pennsylvania, and these two victories in states that will be major battlegrounds in the general election campaign will cause the superdelegates to favor her.

Consequently, the conduct of Ohio’s election officials in administering the primary vote is now important, not only as a “test run” of technologies and procedures to be used again in November, but also in its own right. While it is the prerogative of the Democratic Party to make what use of the Ohio primary vote as it wishes—including any significance the superdelegates may find in the results about the electability of these two candidates in the fall—it remains the responsibility of the state’s election officials to manage the casting and counting of primary ballots properly, so that its results are accurate.

Whether we care about the performance of Ohio’s election system for one or both of these reasons, what should we look for on March 4 to evaluate whether or not it worked satisfactorily?

Here are five things to keep an eye on. While this short list is inevitably incomplete—indeed, one important truth about election administration is the need to maintain flexibility given the good chance that something unexpected will occur—this is a reasonable set of priorities as we come within two weeks of the primary date.

-snip

http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/comments/articles.php?ID=329

5 areas to watch in detail at link:



1. Cuyahoga County.

2. Disenfranchisement through Under-Capacity

3. Polling Place Confusion and Inequalities

4. High Rates of Provisional Voting

5. Irregularities in Absentee Voting

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissaBuck Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Brunner is killing us...
I'm all for fair elections. But, Brunner's EVEREST report is not the indictment of DRE's she claims it is - - at best, it points out potential flaws in BOTH DRE's and Optical Scans. The problem with Jenny's approach to things is that everytime someone disagrees with her - she removes him from office. Jenny is taking such a hard-handed approach on this, she is alienating everyone - D and R and I, the media and the public. The Ohio Association of Election Officials (D and R) voted 20-0 against her. The Commissioner's Association is pissed. The Legislature is wary. If the primary blows up - - - say goodbye to any thought of re-election Jenny. Brunner needs to learn to play nicely with others... And what's with the election "hit" squads with her and Dann. Jenny, you are making us look like jack-booted fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hey you
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 01:36 AM by kster
counting votes in secret via DRE's or Optical Scan machines is a declaration of WAR!!

Anything Goes!!

See you at the Barricades!!

K&R..............

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC