I am providing evidence to both sides of the litigation in the King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association lawsuit, one based on civil rights violations.
I must fault the plaintiffs side of this contention for overstating the ballot losses.
http://www.thealliancefordemocracy.org/html/eng/2473-AA.shtmlThey give the VERY FALSE impression that we cannot move forward with continuing investigations. Actually "In 56 of Ohio's 88 counties" there was some problem with compliance, but there is no problem with sufficient "evidence which would have revealed whether the election was stolen." Why do they tweek the truth into falsehoods?
I do not understand why some people do not seek the truth, excepting, of course, that they can make a lot of money from this. I would prefer a focus on the truth and a real investigation. They do not act on new evidence they are provided with it, just like people did not in the Fall of 2004 when they were promoting the worthless recount!! There may still be a lot of covert operations in play covering up the Ohio 2004 theft, and activists may be under that influence without realizing it. At any rate, their blatant falsehoods remain in print.
The same people who stymied investigations that could have prevented Bush's inauguration are still in position.
Punch card voting was introduced in Ohio when Dems dominated OH politics, and not that long ago (not 30 years). Before long, the state had turned Republican. This is the history that needs investigation. Was Ohio a "fixed state" for over a decade? How many elections were altered? How was the Presidency affected?
Did Al Gore win Ohio in 2000? This is the one that needs attention FIRST!
2000 OFFICIAL PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS
General Election Date: 11/7/00 -
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/2000presgeresults.htmBush 2,351,209
Gore 2,186,190
-------------
margin 125,019
votes 4,705,457
Given how easy it is to find 6% vote-switching in Cuyahoga 2004, I suspect Gore won Ohio in 2000.