Election Protection and CLINTON?

[BillORightsMan]

I don't know why it wouldn't be in vogue to advocate for some transparency in the process.

This from the Capitol Annex (bragging "Outside Austin but terribly well-connected"). Now, it has an Obama slant to start BUT it has lots of FACTS too, some that would cause an Election Protection Advocate to make their ears stand up.
Texas Caucus Process Under Continued Fire From Clinton Camp

Like THIS tidbit:

Therefore, it is our understanding that the results will be counted and delegates awarded based on a count of votes without any determination by the State Party of eligibility of the participants, and without any certification by the Precinct Chairs or County and Senate District Chairs that they completed a thorough review of the eligibility of participants and delegate candidates.

Heck, this involves NO MACHINES AT ALL!!!
(except maybe the POLITICAL machine, eh? Just get a bunch of people to show up - legit or not!)
Maybe the TX Dem Party can be the POSTER CHILD for VOTER I.D.???
:wow:

Sounds like Texas Politics as usual.

And (if you're thinking with yer Election Protection hat on) why would demanding "eligibility of participants and delegate candidates" be a BAD thing?

In a related matter, how was the chain of custody matter ever resolved in NH? Or the whack votes in SC?

imbillorightsmanandiapprovethismessage
:patriot:

[elleng]

1. Hi,

BillO.