Justice Dept. Staff Cleared in Election Report Inquiry

[Wilms]

Justice Dept. Staff Cleared in Election Report Inquiry

By Matthew Mosk
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 30, 2008; Page A07

An independent investigation has found that Republican appointees in the Justice Department did not, as had been alleged, censor a bipartisan commission's report on the sensitive topics of voter fraud and voter intimidation.

snip

The inspector general, Curtis Crider, concluded the editing delays and changes resulted from the belief that the report was "poorly written" and "contained unsupported conclusions." "We found no evidence to support the allegation that the changes were made to the report due to improper reasons or political motivations," he said.

Former Justice Department lawyer Hans A. von Spakovsky said the conclusions represented a personal vindication. Von Spakovsky's appointment to the Federal Election Commission has been held up for months because of allegations that he tried to exert undue political influence on the government's handling of voter fraud and identification matters.

The report, in a section describing allegations of inappropriate Justice Department influence, quoted one of the Republican appointees to the commission claiming that von Spakovsky "certainly tried to influence" him, adding: "There's no question about that."

But von Spakovsky said yesterday that the commissioner, Paul DeGregorio, had misinterpreted his role in the process -- that the Justice Department was supposed to serve the commission in an advisory capacity. "The purpose of the advisers is to provide advice. I was entirely within the scope of my job," he said.

snip

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/29/AR2008032901762.html?hpid=topnews

[babylonsister]

1. Why is this stuff done behind the scenes, and WTF is

von Spakovsky doing being involved at all? Isn't he close to being a criminal? Not even this admin could get him vetted, and that's saying something. Ugh.

[kster]

2. The majority of Americans don't

know what the Justice Dept has been cleared of, Why? Because the DOJ and most if not all of the Politicians still, till this day, REMAIN SILENT about this SCAM!!!

SAD SAD SAD!!

[elleng]

3. Where's the REAL Inspector General,

??? Fine? HIM, I trust.

[Wilms]

4. Add this

Thanks to Melissa G on the Daily Thread:

No Clearance for von Spakovsky

March 31, 2008 by J. Gerald Hebert

Yesterday’s Washington Post story by Matt Mosk that former FEC Commissioner Hans von Spakovsky had been “cleared” of undue influence by an Election Administration Commission IG Report is misleading at best. At the outset, it seems odd that an article like this appeared almost three weeks after it was released. It hardly seems like news at this point in time.

In any event, the article’s conclusion that the Report “cleared” von Spakovsky of any attempts at influencing EAC Commissioners is contrary to the facts set forth in the report. In fact, the report indicated on several occasions that he in fact did make attempts at influencing EAC commissioners for political reasons. In the report former EAC Commissioner Paul DeGregorio is quoted as saying that “too many of decisions are clouded by his partisan thinking.” DeGregorio also said that von Spakovsky “certainly tried to influence” him, adding: “There’s no question about that.” Finally, the report stated that “according to DeGregorio, von Spakovsky thought he should use his position (on the EAC commission) to advance the Repuublican Party position.” So it is clear from this report that von Spakovsky did try and influence DeGregorio for political reasons, but it concludes that such efforts were in the end unsuccessful. Mosk’s story quotes von Spakovsky as saying that the report’s conclusions “represented a personal vindication.” This is a vindication? It sounds more like an illustration of incompetence or ineffectiveness at influencing a commissioner for improper reasons.

Of equal concern is von Spakovsky’s justification for his actions. In the mosk story, he is quoted as saying that “the Justice Department was supposed to serve the (EAC) in an advisory capacity.” He added: “The purpose of the advisers is to provide advice. I was entirely within the scope of my job<.>” Actually, that’s not true, and neither the Inspector General nor Mosk ever bothered to see if it was true. In fact, according to a statement provided to Congress by seven former Justice Department attorneys and staffers, von Spakovsky “usurped” the role of the Voting Section chief during his time at DOJ (from 2003 through December 2005) specifically with regard to his pressuring the EAC. According to one letter, von Spakovsky

assumed the role of de facto Voting Section Chief replacing the career Section Chief in most of his statutory responsibilities and traditional duties managing the Section. Mr. von Spakovsky assumed a position on the EAC Advisory Board that was reserved explicitly by Section 214(a)(13) of the Help America Vote Act for the ‘chief of the Voting Section or the chief’s designee’” even though the Section Chief had never designated Mr. von Spakovsky for this position(.)

http://www.clcblog.org/blog_item-221.html

[kster]

5. SELF DELETE