Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In New Mexico, Bush vs. Kerry Is Still an Issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 12:45 PM
Original message
In New Mexico, Bush vs. Kerry Is Still an Issue
Thanks to new DUer Peter Pan in this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=203&topic_id=48946#49978

In New Mexico, Bush vs. Kerry Is Still an Issue as Votes Trickle In
By REUTERS
Published: November 14, 2004

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/14/politics/14vote.html?oref=login&th

ANTA FE, N.M., Nov. 13 (Reuters) - Senator John Kerry has conceded, President Bush has laid out his plans for a second term and New Mexicans still do not know who won the election in their state.

New Mexico is the only state that does not have a clear-cut winner in the presidential vote, and state officials have been red-faced over the slow count. The state pledged to speed up counting ballots after it took about a month to tally the vote in the 2000 presidential race, where Al Gore beat Mr. Bush by 366 votes.

With most of the ballots counted, Mr. Bush has about 373,000 votes to 365,000 for Mr. Kerry, and several news outlets have projected Mr. Bush as the winner of New Mexico's five electoral votes.

On Friday, all of New Mexico's counties were required to have completed a count in their regions, but one rural county still had problems and did not meet the deadline. The secretary of state's office said Mr. Bush's lead over Mr. Kerry had narrowed to about 6,800 votes, according to initial tallies of the provisional ballots submitted to the office on Friday.

-- a bit more at link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PeterPan Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks for starting this thread


my favorite line in this article is

Republicans said money that should have gone toward counting votes was spent on a marketing campaign intended to increase turnout.


so happy to be here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Welcome to DU
Edited on Sun Nov-14-04 02:24 PM by apolitical no more
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. we got em now
heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who's auditing Ohio?
that other thread sasy BBV is doing FLorida, Nevada, and NM. What about Ohio?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitro Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I have an idea as to why the count in NM is taking so long

BREAKING -- SATURDAY NOV 13 2004: Black Box Voting is implementing fraud diagnostics on the state of New Mexico. Information we recently received is indicative of widespread vote manipulation. We are not going to publicize the specifics here.

Let's try to keep quiet about it, though. It sounds like they don't want to deal with potential interference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC