Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brad Blog: Supreme Court Decision DeRails Hart Qui Tam Lawsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:29 PM
Original message
Brad Blog: Supreme Court Decision DeRails Hart Qui Tam Lawsuit
BLOGGED BY Brad Friedman ON 6/27/2008 12:35PM

Exclusive: Supreme Court Decision Derails Federal Fraud Suit Against Voting Machine Company
Complaint Against Hart InterCivic Withdrawn Following Adverse Ruling Limiting Whistleblower Claims


Reported by Brad Friedman, from the road...

The whistleblower lawsuit against voting machine company Hart InterCivic, as filed in federal court on behalf of former employee William Singer, has been withdrawn following a decision by the Supreme Court that makes pursuing the case nearly impossible, according to the law firm who originally filed the complaint.

The suit had been sealed for nearly two years as the Dept. of Justice asked for extension after extension during their decision on whether or not to join the case. Earlier this year, they ultimately decided not to join the case, as we reported last March, leaving the firm of Levin Papantonio Thomas Mitchell Echsner & Proctor, P.A to proceed on their own. The DoJ declines to join some 76% of such cases.

In the interim, while waiting for the DoJ, the case of Rockwell Intl Corp. v. U.S. came before the U.S. Supreme Court, and the findings in that decision, as attorney Mike Papantonio told The BRAD BLOG, has "made it next to impossible to proceed with any and all federal whistleblower (qui tam) cases."

The decision found that Rockwell was required to pay millions of dollars under the federal False Claims Act to the federal government, but that the relator of the case --- the insider who blew the whistle --- was not entitled to any of that money, nor even for the millions of dollars accrued in legal costs since the amended complaint, filed with the Justice Dept., included information about which the relator did not have direct inside knowledge...

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6115#more-6115
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Disappointing. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some charlatan didn't get payoff? Too bad
By the time Stone sued, the news media had already published several reports detailing environmental violations at that facility (the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant).

http://www.law.duke.edu/publiclaw/supremecourtonline/certgrants/2006/rocvuni

Get lost ... losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We are the losers here
And corporations are the winners.

Now whose side are YOU on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Truth and justice, my friend. Corporations are entities that represent
shareholders but they're not ghouls. In fact, my software started several - with good people behind each one.

Sorry if you live in a sorry world, but where I come from, the Supreme Court decision was reasonable and the effect salutary. You gotta problem with Duke law school's article, take it up with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And this has WHAT to do with Hart misrepresenting their voting systems? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The OP should be
Supreme Court Decision DeRails Fraudulent Hart Qui Tam Lawsuit

Voting systems makers are suffering the consequences of their own incompetence. Irresponsible claims should be their problem, not ours. If Mark Klein bows out now, it just means he never had a legitimate case to begin with and I say, good riddance.

Read the article ... enough people are doing serious work to save sympathy from those who are trying to make an easier buck. It's not that hard to code a decent election system, but the politics are impossible. It's my field, but I won't do it.

So yes, keeping the industry clean is important so competent professionals can do their job. I'll stick to other software specialities, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. LOL. I know corporations aren't ghouls, they just work for them and are often run by them.
Edited on Sun Jun-29-08 11:32 AM by tom_paine
But you know...you've turned me around on this.

I.G Farben got a bad rap. :rofl:

(where's the Zyklon-B smilie when you need it?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. We can't lose its impossible, we are
growing stronger by the day, how long do the two crime families, both D&R believe they can REMAIN SILENT about the counting of our ballots before we take control of our Ballot Count, they can make all the laws they want, but hand counting the ballots in the neighborhood is what's gonna happen.

Peace....K&R


F*CK THEM!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillORightsMan Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I hear ya kster
Edited on Sun Jun-29-08 02:34 AM by BillORightsMan
It's the Status Quo:

These electeds can NEVER ADMIT they were duly elected on FRAUDULENT MACHINES.

It's like the chicken-egg argument.
Which came first, corrupt politicians or corrupt elections?

F*CK THEM?

F*CK US!!

K&R
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I know, its getting laughable, give me your vote
not sure how the vote you give me will be counted, and I must also REMAIN SILENT about how the vote that I want from you gets counted , but Please give me your vote.

GOOD GRIEIF !!

:rofl:

Can you say ORGANIZED CRIME FAMILIES? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Fredda defends FISA too. She's a visitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, whatever Fredda is, she's no patriot.
That much is clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillORightsMan Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Copper Cards
Edited on Sun Jun-29-08 02:06 AM by BillORightsMan
I came across this at a new libertarian site

www.CopperCards.com

http://www.coppercards.com/about/why_is_coppercards_necessary.htm

Unconstitutional laws have altered the relationship between citizens and the legal system. Our legal system has turned from public servant to that of beneficiaries of civilian convictions. Today the U.S. has more people in jail, prison and on probation than all the other nations in the world combined! By 2004, seven million citizens were in jail, prison or on probation, the situation today is even worse. Our courts and government is completely corrupt while the government consistently looks for new ways to generate more revenue.

~snip~
Courts have abandoned the Constitution and Common Law and replaced the law with ‘case law’ and ‘codes’ that reflect the whims and greed of judges and legislators. The more they mess up your life, the more the legal industry and government profits. There is no incentive in the legal industry or the government to take care of you, there is only incentive to rob you. CopperCards shifts the paradigm and reverses the incentive.


Quite plainly, the system is rigged for those in power to STAY in power.
Qui Tam has now gone the way of Habeus Corpus.

As Chalmers Johnson advises: Prepare your own Personal Exit Srategy.

imbilllorightmanandiapprovethismessage
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC